Loading…

Comparison of Acute Versus Subacute Coronary Angiography in Patients With NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the NONSTEMI Trial)

The optimal timing of coronary angiography (CAG) in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome without persisting ST-segment elevation (NST-ACS) remains undetermined. The NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction trial aimed to compare outcomes in NSTE-ACS patients randomized to acute CAG (STEMI-l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2019-09, Vol.124 (6), p.825-832
Main Authors: Rasmussen, Martin B, Stengaard, Carsten, Sørensen, Jacob T, Riddervold, Ingunn S, Søndergaard, Hanne M, Niemann, Troels, Dodt, Karen Kaae, Frost, Lars, Jensen, Tage, Raungaard, Bent, Hansen, Troels M, Giebner, Matthias, Rasmussen, Claus-Henrik, Bøtker, Hans Erik, Kristensen, Steen D, Maeng, Michael, Christiansen, Evald H, Terkelsen, Christian J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The optimal timing of coronary angiography (CAG) in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome without persisting ST-segment elevation (NST-ACS) remains undetermined. The NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction trial aimed to compare outcomes in NSTE-ACS patients randomized to acute CAG (STEMI-like approach) with patients randomized to medical therapy and subacute CAG. We randomized 496 patients with suspected NST-ACS based on symptoms and significant regional ST depressions and/or elevated point-of-care troponin T (POC-cTnT) (≥50 ng/l) to either acute CAG (
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.06.007