Loading…

Comparative Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Adolescents—a National Registry-Based Study

Objective Most published work on bariatric surgery (BS) in adolescents describes outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. We compared the efficacy of LAGB and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in adolescents. Methods A National Bariatric Registry...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity surgery 2020, Vol.30 (1), p.296-303
Main Authors: Blumenfeld, Orit, Beglaibter, Nahum, Geron, Nissim, Dichtiar, Rita, Hazzan, David, Keinan-Boker, Lital, Goitein, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective Most published work on bariatric surgery (BS) in adolescents describes outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. We compared the efficacy of LAGB and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in adolescents. Methods A National Bariatric Registry was queried for adolescents who underwent BS between June 2013 and December 2015. We collected data on weight and height at baseline and 1-year following surgery, subsequent hospitalizations, interventions, and mortality, which were compared at 30 days post-surgery and until last follow-up (maximum 4.2 years post-surgery). Mortality and hospitalization data were extracted from national databases. Results Two hundred fifty-nine adolescents (60% females) aged 12–19 years were included. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 17.5 ± 1.2 years and 45.1 ± 5.0 kg/m 2 , respectively. LSG ( n  = 227, 87.6%) and LAGB ( n  = 32, 12.4%) were the most common procedures performed. LSG group achieved greater average at 1 year BMI loss compared to LAGB group (15.4 ± 4.7 kg/m 2 vs. 10.3 ± 5.1 kg/m 2 respectively; p  = 0.0001) and higher rate with BMI
ISSN:0960-8923
1708-0428
DOI:10.1007/s11695-019-04155-1