Loading…

Normative brain volumetry derived from different reference populations: impact on single-subject diagnostic assessment in dementia

Brain imaging data are increasingly made publicly accessible, and volumetric imaging measures derived from population-based cohorts may serve as normative data for individual patient diagnostic assessment. Yet, these normative cohorts are usually not a perfect reflection of a patient's base pop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurobiology of aging 2019-12, Vol.84, p.9-16
Main Authors: Vinke, Elisabeth J., Huizinga, Wyke, Bergtholdt, Martin, Adams, Hieab H., Steketee, Rebecca M.E., Papma, Janne M., de Jong, Frank J., Niessen, Wiro J., Ikram, M. Arfan, Wenzel, Fabian, Vernooij, Meike W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ae2f45ae67403055ff6e7c6330bfde830bff996bbb93574a63f66774a22bbf9f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ae2f45ae67403055ff6e7c6330bfde830bff996bbb93574a63f66774a22bbf9f3
container_end_page 16
container_issue
container_start_page 9
container_title Neurobiology of aging
container_volume 84
creator Vinke, Elisabeth J.
Huizinga, Wyke
Bergtholdt, Martin
Adams, Hieab H.
Steketee, Rebecca M.E.
Papma, Janne M.
de Jong, Frank J.
Niessen, Wiro J.
Ikram, M. Arfan
Wenzel, Fabian
Vernooij, Meike W.
description Brain imaging data are increasingly made publicly accessible, and volumetric imaging measures derived from population-based cohorts may serve as normative data for individual patient diagnostic assessment. Yet, these normative cohorts are usually not a perfect reflection of a patient's base population, nor are imaging parameters such as field strength or scanner type similar. In this proof of principle study, we assessed differences between reference curves of subcortical structure volumes of normal controls derived from two population-based studies and a case-control study. We assessed the impact of any differences on individual assessment of brain structure volumes. Percentile curves were fitted on the three healthy cohorts. Next, percentile values for these subcortical structures for individual patients from these three cohorts, 91 mild cognitive impairment and 95 Alzheimer's disease cases and patients from the Alzheimer Center, were calculated, based on the distributions of each of the three cohorts. Overall, we found that the subcortical volume normative data from these cohorts are highly interchangeable, suggesting more flexibility in clinical implementation. •Subcortical volume normative data from 3 populations are highly interchangeable.•The hippocampus volume percentiles were very robust across populations.•Results suggest more flexibility in clinical implementation of these percentiles.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.07.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2286945607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0197458019302106</els_id><sourcerecordid>2286945607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ae2f45ae67403055ff6e7c6330bfde830bff996bbb93574a63f66774a22bbf9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1TAQtCpQ-yj8BeQDh16SbhJ_JIgLqiggVeXSni07Xj_5KYmDnTypV345Dq8g9cZpR-vZHe8MIR8qKCuoxPWhnHCNwfgw6L2f9mUNVVeCLAHaM7KrOG-LinXyFdnlB1kw3sIFeZPSAQAkk-KcXDSZUPFO7Miv-xBHvfgjUhO1n-gxDOuIS3yiFmNuW-piGKn1zmHEaaER_4Ae6RzmdcizYUofqR9n3S80TDTlTw1YpNUcMHes1_sppMX3VKeEKY3blqxkcUNevyWvnR4Svnuul-Tx9svDzbfi7sfX7zef74qeMVgKjbVjXKOQDBrg3DmBshdNA8ZZbLfiuk4YY7qGS6ZF44SQGdS1Ma5zzSW5Ou2dY_i5YlrU6FOPw6AnDGtSdd2KjnEBMlM_nah9DCnli9Uc_ajjk6pAbSmog3qZgtpSUCBVTiGPv39WWs2I9t_wX9sz4fZEwHzv0WNUqfebp9bH7Jmywf-f0m8GXaYZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2286945607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Normative brain volumetry derived from different reference populations: impact on single-subject diagnostic assessment in dementia</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Vinke, Elisabeth J. ; Huizinga, Wyke ; Bergtholdt, Martin ; Adams, Hieab H. ; Steketee, Rebecca M.E. ; Papma, Janne M. ; de Jong, Frank J. ; Niessen, Wiro J. ; Ikram, M. Arfan ; Wenzel, Fabian ; Vernooij, Meike W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vinke, Elisabeth J. ; Huizinga, Wyke ; Bergtholdt, Martin ; Adams, Hieab H. ; Steketee, Rebecca M.E. ; Papma, Janne M. ; de Jong, Frank J. ; Niessen, Wiro J. ; Ikram, M. Arfan ; Wenzel, Fabian ; Vernooij, Meike W. ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><description>Brain imaging data are increasingly made publicly accessible, and volumetric imaging measures derived from population-based cohorts may serve as normative data for individual patient diagnostic assessment. Yet, these normative cohorts are usually not a perfect reflection of a patient's base population, nor are imaging parameters such as field strength or scanner type similar. In this proof of principle study, we assessed differences between reference curves of subcortical structure volumes of normal controls derived from two population-based studies and a case-control study. We assessed the impact of any differences on individual assessment of brain structure volumes. Percentile curves were fitted on the three healthy cohorts. Next, percentile values for these subcortical structures for individual patients from these three cohorts, 91 mild cognitive impairment and 95 Alzheimer's disease cases and patients from the Alzheimer Center, were calculated, based on the distributions of each of the three cohorts. Overall, we found that the subcortical volume normative data from these cohorts are highly interchangeable, suggesting more flexibility in clinical implementation. •Subcortical volume normative data from 3 populations are highly interchangeable.•The hippocampus volume percentiles were very robust across populations.•Results suggest more flexibility in clinical implementation of these percentiles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-4580</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.07.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31491596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Cohort Studies ; Dementia - diagnosis ; Humans ; Imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; MRI ; Normative data ; Organ Size ; Subcortical brain volume</subject><ispartof>Neurobiology of aging, 2019-12, Vol.84, p.9-16</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ae2f45ae67403055ff6e7c6330bfde830bff996bbb93574a63f66774a22bbf9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ae2f45ae67403055ff6e7c6330bfde830bff996bbb93574a63f66774a22bbf9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31491596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vinke, Elisabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huizinga, Wyke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergtholdt, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Hieab H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steketee, Rebecca M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papma, Janne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niessen, Wiro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikram, M. Arfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernooij, Meike W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><title>Normative brain volumetry derived from different reference populations: impact on single-subject diagnostic assessment in dementia</title><title>Neurobiology of aging</title><addtitle>Neurobiol Aging</addtitle><description>Brain imaging data are increasingly made publicly accessible, and volumetric imaging measures derived from population-based cohorts may serve as normative data for individual patient diagnostic assessment. Yet, these normative cohorts are usually not a perfect reflection of a patient's base population, nor are imaging parameters such as field strength or scanner type similar. In this proof of principle study, we assessed differences between reference curves of subcortical structure volumes of normal controls derived from two population-based studies and a case-control study. We assessed the impact of any differences on individual assessment of brain structure volumes. Percentile curves were fitted on the three healthy cohorts. Next, percentile values for these subcortical structures for individual patients from these three cohorts, 91 mild cognitive impairment and 95 Alzheimer's disease cases and patients from the Alzheimer Center, were calculated, based on the distributions of each of the three cohorts. Overall, we found that the subcortical volume normative data from these cohorts are highly interchangeable, suggesting more flexibility in clinical implementation. •Subcortical volume normative data from 3 populations are highly interchangeable.•The hippocampus volume percentiles were very robust across populations.•Results suggest more flexibility in clinical implementation of these percentiles.</description><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dementia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>Normative data</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Subcortical brain volume</subject><issn>0197-4580</issn><issn>1558-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1v1TAQtCpQ-yj8BeQDh16SbhJ_JIgLqiggVeXSni07Xj_5KYmDnTypV345Dq8g9cZpR-vZHe8MIR8qKCuoxPWhnHCNwfgw6L2f9mUNVVeCLAHaM7KrOG-LinXyFdnlB1kw3sIFeZPSAQAkk-KcXDSZUPFO7Miv-xBHvfgjUhO1n-gxDOuIS3yiFmNuW-piGKn1zmHEaaER_4Ae6RzmdcizYUofqR9n3S80TDTlTw1YpNUcMHes1_sppMX3VKeEKY3blqxkcUNevyWvnR4Svnuul-Tx9svDzbfi7sfX7zef74qeMVgKjbVjXKOQDBrg3DmBshdNA8ZZbLfiuk4YY7qGS6ZF44SQGdS1Ma5zzSW5Ou2dY_i5YlrU6FOPw6AnDGtSdd2KjnEBMlM_nah9DCnli9Uc_ajjk6pAbSmog3qZgtpSUCBVTiGPv39WWs2I9t_wX9sz4fZEwHzv0WNUqfebp9bH7Jmywf-f0m8GXaYZ</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Vinke, Elisabeth J.</creator><creator>Huizinga, Wyke</creator><creator>Bergtholdt, Martin</creator><creator>Adams, Hieab H.</creator><creator>Steketee, Rebecca M.E.</creator><creator>Papma, Janne M.</creator><creator>de Jong, Frank J.</creator><creator>Niessen, Wiro J.</creator><creator>Ikram, M. Arfan</creator><creator>Wenzel, Fabian</creator><creator>Vernooij, Meike W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Normative brain volumetry derived from different reference populations: impact on single-subject diagnostic assessment in dementia</title><author>Vinke, Elisabeth J. ; Huizinga, Wyke ; Bergtholdt, Martin ; Adams, Hieab H. ; Steketee, Rebecca M.E. ; Papma, Janne M. ; de Jong, Frank J. ; Niessen, Wiro J. ; Ikram, M. Arfan ; Wenzel, Fabian ; Vernooij, Meike W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ae2f45ae67403055ff6e7c6330bfde830bff996bbb93574a63f66774a22bbf9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dementia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>Normative data</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Subcortical brain volume</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vinke, Elisabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huizinga, Wyke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergtholdt, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Hieab H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steketee, Rebecca M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papma, Janne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niessen, Wiro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikram, M. Arfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernooij, Meike W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurobiology of aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vinke, Elisabeth J.</au><au>Huizinga, Wyke</au><au>Bergtholdt, Martin</au><au>Adams, Hieab H.</au><au>Steketee, Rebecca M.E.</au><au>Papma, Janne M.</au><au>de Jong, Frank J.</au><au>Niessen, Wiro J.</au><au>Ikram, M. Arfan</au><au>Wenzel, Fabian</au><au>Vernooij, Meike W.</au><aucorp>Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Normative brain volumetry derived from different reference populations: impact on single-subject diagnostic assessment in dementia</atitle><jtitle>Neurobiology of aging</jtitle><addtitle>Neurobiol Aging</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>84</volume><spage>9</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>9-16</pages><issn>0197-4580</issn><eissn>1558-1497</eissn><abstract>Brain imaging data are increasingly made publicly accessible, and volumetric imaging measures derived from population-based cohorts may serve as normative data for individual patient diagnostic assessment. Yet, these normative cohorts are usually not a perfect reflection of a patient's base population, nor are imaging parameters such as field strength or scanner type similar. In this proof of principle study, we assessed differences between reference curves of subcortical structure volumes of normal controls derived from two population-based studies and a case-control study. We assessed the impact of any differences on individual assessment of brain structure volumes. Percentile curves were fitted on the three healthy cohorts. Next, percentile values for these subcortical structures for individual patients from these three cohorts, 91 mild cognitive impairment and 95 Alzheimer's disease cases and patients from the Alzheimer Center, were calculated, based on the distributions of each of the three cohorts. Overall, we found that the subcortical volume normative data from these cohorts are highly interchangeable, suggesting more flexibility in clinical implementation. •Subcortical volume normative data from 3 populations are highly interchangeable.•The hippocampus volume percentiles were very robust across populations.•Results suggest more flexibility in clinical implementation of these percentiles.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31491596</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.07.008</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-4580
ispartof Neurobiology of aging, 2019-12, Vol.84, p.9-16
issn 0197-4580
1558-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2286945607
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Brain - diagnostic imaging
Cohort Studies
Dementia - diagnosis
Humans
Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI
Normative data
Organ Size
Subcortical brain volume
title Normative brain volumetry derived from different reference populations: impact on single-subject diagnostic assessment in dementia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A42%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Normative%20brain%20volumetry%20derived%20from%20different%20reference%20populations:%20impact%20on%20single-subject%20diagnostic%20assessment%20in%20dementia&rft.jtitle=Neurobiology%20of%20aging&rft.au=Vinke,%20Elisabeth%20J.&rft.aucorp=Alzheimer's%20Disease%20Neuroimaging%20Initiative&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=84&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=9-16&rft.issn=0197-4580&rft.eissn=1558-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.07.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2286945607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ae2f45ae67403055ff6e7c6330bfde830bff996bbb93574a63f66774a22bbf9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2286945607&rft_id=info:pmid/31491596&rfr_iscdi=true