Loading…

Genetic Structure of Northern Fowl Mite (Mesostigmata: Macronyssidae) Populations Among Layer Chicken Flocks and Local House Sparrows (Passeriformes: Passeridae)

The northern fowl mite (NFM) Ornithonyssus sylviarum Canestrini and Fanzago is a blood-feeding ectoparasite found on many wild bird species and is a pest of poultry in the United States. It is unknown where NFM infestations of poultry originate, which has made it difficult to establish preventative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical entomology 2020-01, Vol.57 (1), p.122-130
Main Authors: McCulloch, John B., Owen, Jeb P., Hinkle, Nancy C., Mullens, Bradley A., Busch, Jeremiah W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b444t-f3ef78e084493bd63845f3b04da1ea255fce7732fba111d3ba41f64646bab1df3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b444t-f3ef78e084493bd63845f3b04da1ea255fce7732fba111d3ba41f64646bab1df3
container_end_page 130
container_issue 1
container_start_page 122
container_title Journal of medical entomology
container_volume 57
creator McCulloch, John B.
Owen, Jeb P.
Hinkle, Nancy C.
Mullens, Bradley A.
Busch, Jeremiah W.
description The northern fowl mite (NFM) Ornithonyssus sylviarum Canestrini and Fanzago is a blood-feeding ectoparasite found on many wild bird species and is a pest of poultry in the United States. It is unknown where NFM infestations of poultry originate, which has made it difficult to establish preventative biosecurity or effective control. We used microsatellite markers to evaluate genetic variation within and among NFM populations to determine routes of introduction onto farms and long-term persistence. We compared NFM from flocks of chickens (Gallus gallus) on different farms in California, Washington, and Georgia, and we compared NFM collected over a 5-yr interval. On three farms we collected NFM from chickens and house sparrows (Passer domesticus) nesting on each farm, which we used to assess movement between host species.There was strong genetic structure among mites from different poultry farms and low estimates of migration between farms. There were significant differences between mites on chickens and house sparrows on two farms where sparrows nested near flocks, indicating no exchange of mites. Only one farm showed evidence of NFM movement between chickens and sparrows.There was high genetic similarity between mites collected 5 yr apart on each of two farms, indicating that NFM infestations can persist for long periods.The genetic patterns did not reveal sources of NFM infestations on chicken farms.The data suggest that NFMs are strongly differentiated, which likely reflects periodic population declines with flock turnover and pesticide pressure.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jme/tjz136
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2288720269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jme/tjz136</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2399225586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b444t-f3ef78e084493bd63845f3b04da1ea255fce7732fba111d3ba41f64646bab1df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctq3DAUhkVpaKZpN32AIiiFacGNbvbI2YWhucBME0i6NpJ9lGhiS44kE6Zv0zetwky76CJocRB8fOfyI_SBkm-U1Px4M8Bx2vyivHqFZrTmsmA1k6_RjBDGClbK8hC9jXFDCJFU1G_QIaclEZWUM_T7HBwk2-KbFKY2TQGwN_iHD-kegsNn_qnHa5sAz9cQfUz2blBJneC1aoN32xhtp-ALvvbj1KtkvYv4dPDuDq_UFgJe3tv2AbKn9-1DxMp1eOVb1eMLP0XAN6MKwT9FPL9WMUKwxocB4gnef5_d79CBUX2E9_t6hH6efb9dXhSrq_PL5emq0EKIVBgOZiGBSCFqrruKS1EaronoFAXFytK0sFhwZrSilHZcK0FNJfLTStPO8CM033nH4B8niKkZbGyh75WDPGzDmJQLRlhVZ_TTf-jGT8Hl6RrG65rlbrLK1NcdlS8VYwDTjMEOKmwbSprn4JocXLMLLsMf98pJD9D9Q_8mlYHPO8BP48ui_Rraeu_gJfQPNkuxLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2399225586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic Structure of Northern Fowl Mite (Mesostigmata: Macronyssidae) Populations Among Layer Chicken Flocks and Local House Sparrows (Passeriformes: Passeridae)</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>McCulloch, John B. ; Owen, Jeb P. ; Hinkle, Nancy C. ; Mullens, Bradley A. ; Busch, Jeremiah W.</creator><contributor>Slotman, Michel</contributor><creatorcontrib>McCulloch, John B. ; Owen, Jeb P. ; Hinkle, Nancy C. ; Mullens, Bradley A. ; Busch, Jeremiah W. ; Slotman, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>The northern fowl mite (NFM) Ornithonyssus sylviarum Canestrini and Fanzago is a blood-feeding ectoparasite found on many wild bird species and is a pest of poultry in the United States. It is unknown where NFM infestations of poultry originate, which has made it difficult to establish preventative biosecurity or effective control. We used microsatellite markers to evaluate genetic variation within and among NFM populations to determine routes of introduction onto farms and long-term persistence. We compared NFM from flocks of chickens (Gallus gallus) on different farms in California, Washington, and Georgia, and we compared NFM collected over a 5-yr interval. On three farms we collected NFM from chickens and house sparrows (Passer domesticus) nesting on each farm, which we used to assess movement between host species.There was strong genetic structure among mites from different poultry farms and low estimates of migration between farms. There were significant differences between mites on chickens and house sparrows on two farms where sparrows nested near flocks, indicating no exchange of mites. Only one farm showed evidence of NFM movement between chickens and sparrows.There was high genetic similarity between mites collected 5 yr apart on each of two farms, indicating that NFM infestations can persist for long periods.The genetic patterns did not reveal sources of NFM infestations on chicken farms.The data suggest that NFMs are strongly differentiated, which likely reflects periodic population declines with flock turnover and pesticide pressure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2928</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjz136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31504688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Biosecurity ; Birds ; Chickens ; ectoparasite ; Ectoparasites ; Farms ; force of infection ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic markers ; Genetic structure ; host race ; isolation by distance ; Microsatellites ; Mites ; Nesting ; parasitism ; Pesticides ; POPULATION BIOLOGY/GENETICS ; Population decline ; Populations ; Poultry ; Poultry farming ; Route selection</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical entomology, 2020-01, Vol.57 (1), p.122-130</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b444t-f3ef78e084493bd63845f3b04da1ea255fce7732fba111d3ba41f64646bab1df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b444t-f3ef78e084493bd63845f3b04da1ea255fce7732fba111d3ba41f64646bab1df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Slotman, Michel</contributor><creatorcontrib>McCulloch, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Jeb P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkle, Nancy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullens, Bradley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busch, Jeremiah W.</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic Structure of Northern Fowl Mite (Mesostigmata: Macronyssidae) Populations Among Layer Chicken Flocks and Local House Sparrows (Passeriformes: Passeridae)</title><title>Journal of medical entomology</title><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><description>The northern fowl mite (NFM) Ornithonyssus sylviarum Canestrini and Fanzago is a blood-feeding ectoparasite found on many wild bird species and is a pest of poultry in the United States. It is unknown where NFM infestations of poultry originate, which has made it difficult to establish preventative biosecurity or effective control. We used microsatellite markers to evaluate genetic variation within and among NFM populations to determine routes of introduction onto farms and long-term persistence. We compared NFM from flocks of chickens (Gallus gallus) on different farms in California, Washington, and Georgia, and we compared NFM collected over a 5-yr interval. On three farms we collected NFM from chickens and house sparrows (Passer domesticus) nesting on each farm, which we used to assess movement between host species.There was strong genetic structure among mites from different poultry farms and low estimates of migration between farms. There were significant differences between mites on chickens and house sparrows on two farms where sparrows nested near flocks, indicating no exchange of mites. Only one farm showed evidence of NFM movement between chickens and sparrows.There was high genetic similarity between mites collected 5 yr apart on each of two farms, indicating that NFM infestations can persist for long periods.The genetic patterns did not reveal sources of NFM infestations on chicken farms.The data suggest that NFMs are strongly differentiated, which likely reflects periodic population declines with flock turnover and pesticide pressure.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Biosecurity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>ectoparasite</subject><subject>Ectoparasites</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>force of infection</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic markers</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>host race</subject><subject>isolation by distance</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>parasitism</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>POPULATION BIOLOGY/GENETICS</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry farming</subject><subject>Route selection</subject><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctq3DAUhkVpaKZpN32AIiiFacGNbvbI2YWhucBME0i6NpJ9lGhiS44kE6Zv0zetwky76CJocRB8fOfyI_SBkm-U1Px4M8Bx2vyivHqFZrTmsmA1k6_RjBDGClbK8hC9jXFDCJFU1G_QIaclEZWUM_T7HBwk2-KbFKY2TQGwN_iHD-kegsNn_qnHa5sAz9cQfUz2blBJneC1aoN32xhtp-ALvvbj1KtkvYv4dPDuDq_UFgJe3tv2AbKn9-1DxMp1eOVb1eMLP0XAN6MKwT9FPL9WMUKwxocB4gnef5_d79CBUX2E9_t6hH6efb9dXhSrq_PL5emq0EKIVBgOZiGBSCFqrruKS1EaronoFAXFytK0sFhwZrSilHZcK0FNJfLTStPO8CM033nH4B8niKkZbGyh75WDPGzDmJQLRlhVZ_TTf-jGT8Hl6RrG65rlbrLK1NcdlS8VYwDTjMEOKmwbSprn4JocXLMLLsMf98pJD9D9Q_8mlYHPO8BP48ui_Rraeu_gJfQPNkuxLg</recordid><startdate>20200109</startdate><enddate>20200109</enddate><creator>McCulloch, John B.</creator><creator>Owen, Jeb P.</creator><creator>Hinkle, Nancy C.</creator><creator>Mullens, Bradley A.</creator><creator>Busch, Jeremiah W.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200109</creationdate><title>Genetic Structure of Northern Fowl Mite (Mesostigmata: Macronyssidae) Populations Among Layer Chicken Flocks and Local House Sparrows (Passeriformes: Passeridae)</title><author>McCulloch, John B. ; Owen, Jeb P. ; Hinkle, Nancy C. ; Mullens, Bradley A. ; Busch, Jeremiah W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b444t-f3ef78e084493bd63845f3b04da1ea255fce7732fba111d3ba41f64646bab1df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Biosecurity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>ectoparasite</topic><topic>Ectoparasites</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>force of infection</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic markers</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>host race</topic><topic>isolation by distance</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>parasitism</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>POPULATION BIOLOGY/GENETICS</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry farming</topic><topic>Route selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCulloch, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Jeb P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkle, Nancy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullens, Bradley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busch, Jeremiah W.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCulloch, John B.</au><au>Owen, Jeb P.</au><au>Hinkle, Nancy C.</au><au>Mullens, Bradley A.</au><au>Busch, Jeremiah W.</au><au>Slotman, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic Structure of Northern Fowl Mite (Mesostigmata: Macronyssidae) Populations Among Layer Chicken Flocks and Local House Sparrows (Passeriformes: Passeridae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><date>2020-01-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>122-130</pages><issn>0022-2585</issn><eissn>1938-2928</eissn><abstract>The northern fowl mite (NFM) Ornithonyssus sylviarum Canestrini and Fanzago is a blood-feeding ectoparasite found on many wild bird species and is a pest of poultry in the United States. It is unknown where NFM infestations of poultry originate, which has made it difficult to establish preventative biosecurity or effective control. We used microsatellite markers to evaluate genetic variation within and among NFM populations to determine routes of introduction onto farms and long-term persistence. We compared NFM from flocks of chickens (Gallus gallus) on different farms in California, Washington, and Georgia, and we compared NFM collected over a 5-yr interval. On three farms we collected NFM from chickens and house sparrows (Passer domesticus) nesting on each farm, which we used to assess movement between host species.There was strong genetic structure among mites from different poultry farms and low estimates of migration between farms. There were significant differences between mites on chickens and house sparrows on two farms where sparrows nested near flocks, indicating no exchange of mites. Only one farm showed evidence of NFM movement between chickens and sparrows.There was high genetic similarity between mites collected 5 yr apart on each of two farms, indicating that NFM infestations can persist for long periods.The genetic patterns did not reveal sources of NFM infestations on chicken farms.The data suggest that NFMs are strongly differentiated, which likely reflects periodic population declines with flock turnover and pesticide pressure.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>31504688</pmid><doi>10.1093/jme/tjz136</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2585
ispartof Journal of medical entomology, 2020-01, Vol.57 (1), p.122-130
issn 0022-2585
1938-2928
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2288720269
source Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)
subjects Animal behavior
Biosecurity
Birds
Chickens
ectoparasite
Ectoparasites
Farms
force of infection
Genetic diversity
Genetic markers
Genetic structure
host race
isolation by distance
Microsatellites
Mites
Nesting
parasitism
Pesticides
POPULATION BIOLOGY/GENETICS
Population decline
Populations
Poultry
Poultry farming
Route selection
title Genetic Structure of Northern Fowl Mite (Mesostigmata: Macronyssidae) Populations Among Layer Chicken Flocks and Local House Sparrows (Passeriformes: Passeridae)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T05%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20Structure%20of%20Northern%20Fowl%20Mite%20(Mesostigmata:%20Macronyssidae)%20Populations%20Among%20Layer%20Chicken%20Flocks%20and%20Local%20House%20Sparrows%20(Passeriformes:%20Passeridae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20entomology&rft.au=McCulloch,%20John%20B.&rft.date=2020-01-09&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=122-130&rft.issn=0022-2585&rft.eissn=1938-2928&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jme/tjz136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2399225586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b444t-f3ef78e084493bd63845f3b04da1ea255fce7732fba111d3ba41f64646bab1df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2399225586&rft_id=info:pmid/31504688&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jme/tjz136&rfr_iscdi=true