Loading…
What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?
May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference,...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 2019-01, Vol.42, p.e157-e157, Article e157 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413 |
container_end_page | e157 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e157 |
container_title | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Kauppinen, Antti |
description | May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference, and leaves open crucial questions about how we reason to moral conclusions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0140525X18002649 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2288732110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X18002649</cupid><sourcerecordid>2292882463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC9S8OLB6Mx-ZfckUvwCwYOK3sJms9EtSVN3k4P_3oS2CoqXGZj3mXeGl5BDhDMETM8fATkIKl5RAVDJ9RYZI5c6QUXFNhkPcjLoI7IX4xwABBd6l4wYCpDIYExOX95NO_VxGt2i9XVfTOVjfTHdzINpfbNYDffJTmmq6A7WfUKer6-eZrfJ_cPN3ezyPrGMijax3KTOMS2xkMhtznOmnFCmoLnTyjolGeSCUc5laQuUzNqSlqnTZcGBcWQTcrLyXYbmo3OxzWofrasqs3BNFzNKlUoZRYQePf6Fzpsu9P8OlO45yiXrKVxRNjQxBldmy-BrEz4zhGyIMvsTZb9ztHbu8toV3xub7HqArU1NnQdfvLmf2__bfgEejXuv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2292882463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Kauppinen, Antti</creator><creatorcontrib>Kauppinen, Antti</creatorcontrib><description>May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference, and leaves open crucial questions about how we reason to moral conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X18002649</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31506130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Antisocial personality disorder ; Emotions ; Lying ; Morality ; Open Peer Commentary ; Rationalism</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2019-01, Vol.42, p.e157-e157, Article e157</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6328-6374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X18002649/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,72706</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kauppinen, Antti</creatorcontrib><title>What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference, and leaves open crucial questions about how we reason to moral conclusions.</description><subject>Antisocial personality disorder</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Lying</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Open Peer Commentary</subject><subject>Rationalism</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC9S8OLB6Mx-ZfckUvwCwYOK3sJms9EtSVN3k4P_3oS2CoqXGZj3mXeGl5BDhDMETM8fATkIKl5RAVDJ9RYZI5c6QUXFNhkPcjLoI7IX4xwABBd6l4wYCpDIYExOX95NO_VxGt2i9XVfTOVjfTHdzINpfbNYDffJTmmq6A7WfUKer6-eZrfJ_cPN3ezyPrGMijax3KTOMS2xkMhtznOmnFCmoLnTyjolGeSCUc5laQuUzNqSlqnTZcGBcWQTcrLyXYbmo3OxzWofrasqs3BNFzNKlUoZRYQePf6Fzpsu9P8OlO45yiXrKVxRNjQxBldmy-BrEz4zhGyIMvsTZb9ztHbu8toV3xub7HqArU1NnQdfvLmf2__bfgEejXuv</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Kauppinen, Antti</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-6374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?</title><author>Kauppinen, Antti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antisocial personality disorder</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Lying</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Open Peer Commentary</topic><topic>Rationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kauppinen, Antti</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kauppinen, Antti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><spage>e157</spage><epage>e157</epage><pages>e157-e157</pages><artnum>e157</artnum><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><abstract>May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference, and leaves open crucial questions about how we reason to moral conclusions.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>31506130</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0140525X18002649</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-6374</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-525X |
ispartof | The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2019-01, Vol.42, p.e157-e157, Article e157 |
issn | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2288732110 |
source | Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Antisocial personality disorder Emotions Lying Morality Open Peer Commentary Rationalism |
title | What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20sentimentalism?%20What%20is%20rationalism?&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Kauppinen,%20Antti&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.spage=e157&rft.epage=e157&rft.pages=e157-e157&rft.artnum=e157&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X18002649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2292882463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2292882463&rft_id=info:pmid/31506130&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X18002649&rfr_iscdi=true |