Loading…

What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?

May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Behavioral and brain sciences 2019-01, Vol.42, p.e157-e157, Article e157
Main Author: Kauppinen, Antti
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413
container_end_page e157
container_issue
container_start_page e157
container_title The Behavioral and brain sciences
container_volume 42
creator Kauppinen, Antti
description May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference, and leaves open crucial questions about how we reason to moral conclusions.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0140525X18002649
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2288732110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X18002649</cupid><sourcerecordid>2292882463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC9S8OLB6Mx-ZfckUvwCwYOK3sJms9EtSVN3k4P_3oS2CoqXGZj3mXeGl5BDhDMETM8fATkIKl5RAVDJ9RYZI5c6QUXFNhkPcjLoI7IX4xwABBd6l4wYCpDIYExOX95NO_VxGt2i9XVfTOVjfTHdzINpfbNYDffJTmmq6A7WfUKer6-eZrfJ_cPN3ezyPrGMijax3KTOMS2xkMhtznOmnFCmoLnTyjolGeSCUc5laQuUzNqSlqnTZcGBcWQTcrLyXYbmo3OxzWofrasqs3BNFzNKlUoZRYQePf6Fzpsu9P8OlO45yiXrKVxRNjQxBldmy-BrEz4zhGyIMvsTZb9ztHbu8toV3xub7HqArU1NnQdfvLmf2__bfgEejXuv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2292882463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Kauppinen, Antti</creator><creatorcontrib>Kauppinen, Antti</creatorcontrib><description>May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference, and leaves open crucial questions about how we reason to moral conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X18002649</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31506130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Antisocial personality disorder ; Emotions ; Lying ; Morality ; Open Peer Commentary ; Rationalism</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2019-01, Vol.42, p.e157-e157, Article e157</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6328-6374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X18002649/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,72706</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kauppinen, Antti</creatorcontrib><title>What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference, and leaves open crucial questions about how we reason to moral conclusions.</description><subject>Antisocial personality disorder</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Lying</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Open Peer Commentary</subject><subject>Rationalism</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC9S8OLB6Mx-ZfckUvwCwYOK3sJms9EtSVN3k4P_3oS2CoqXGZj3mXeGl5BDhDMETM8fATkIKl5RAVDJ9RYZI5c6QUXFNhkPcjLoI7IX4xwABBd6l4wYCpDIYExOX95NO_VxGt2i9XVfTOVjfTHdzINpfbNYDffJTmmq6A7WfUKer6-eZrfJ_cPN3ezyPrGMijax3KTOMS2xkMhtznOmnFCmoLnTyjolGeSCUc5laQuUzNqSlqnTZcGBcWQTcrLyXYbmo3OxzWofrasqs3BNFzNKlUoZRYQePf6Fzpsu9P8OlO45yiXrKVxRNjQxBldmy-BrEz4zhGyIMvsTZb9ztHbu8toV3xub7HqArU1NnQdfvLmf2__bfgEejXuv</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Kauppinen, Antti</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-6374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?</title><author>Kauppinen, Antti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antisocial personality disorder</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Lying</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Open Peer Commentary</topic><topic>Rationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kauppinen, Antti</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kauppinen, Antti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><spage>e157</spage><epage>e157</epage><pages>e157-e157</pages><artnum>e157</artnum><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><abstract>May argues successfully that many claims about the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown. But the findings he cites are compatible with many of the key arguments of philosophical sentimentalists. His account of rationalism, in turn, relies on an overly broad notion of inference, and leaves open crucial questions about how we reason to moral conclusions.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>31506130</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0140525X18002649</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-6374</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-525X
ispartof The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2019-01, Vol.42, p.e157-e157, Article e157
issn 0140-525X
1469-1825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2288732110
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Antisocial personality disorder
Emotions
Lying
Morality
Open Peer Commentary
Rationalism
title What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20sentimentalism?%20What%20is%20rationalism?&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Kauppinen,%20Antti&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.spage=e157&rft.epage=e157&rft.pages=e157-e157&rft.artnum=e157&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X18002649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2292882463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c4a7ee3961d614cb4b38e58ad2be98ce8630b532446fcd163ccf2f7e9fd403413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2292882463&rft_id=info:pmid/31506130&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X18002649&rfr_iscdi=true