Loading…

Recommended foscarnet dose is not associated with improved outcomes in cytomegalovirus salvage therapy

•Foscarnet dosing is frequently discordant with package insert recommendations.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of CMV eradication.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of acute kidney injury. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical virology 2019-11, Vol.120, p.12-16
Main Authors: Spinner, Michael L., Lam, Simon W., Koval, Christine E., Athans, Vasilios
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d26d554e9b0eddfe655ec513b6c624d189f4cafccd055f238e11a354bb897563
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d26d554e9b0eddfe655ec513b6c624d189f4cafccd055f238e11a354bb897563
container_end_page 16
container_issue
container_start_page 12
container_title Journal of clinical virology
container_volume 120
creator Spinner, Michael L.
Lam, Simon W.
Koval, Christine E.
Athans, Vasilios
description •Foscarnet dosing is frequently discordant with package insert recommendations.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of CMV eradication.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of acute kidney injury. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir have proven efficacy but are limited by resistance and toxicity, whereas foscarnet typically retains activity when CMV has become resistant to other antivirals. Foscarnet dosing used in practice may be discordant with what is recommended in product labeling, as the result of an unconventional dosing nomogram or prescriber preference; however, it is unknown how discordant foscarnet dosing affects outcomes. Our purpose was to characterize the relationship between initial foscarnet dosing intensity (relative to product labeling) and key effectiveness and safety endpoints. This single-center, retrospective study included immunosuppressed adults with CMV viremia who received foscarnet between January 2012–July 2017. Subjects were divided into low dose (LD) and non-low dose (NLD) groups, according to foscarnet dose intensity. The primary endpoint was time-to-CMV eradication. Secondary endpoints included time-to-CMV clearance, acute kidney injury, hematologic toxicity, and mortality. Of 87 subjects, 38 met inclusion. Primary immunosuppression reasons were solid organ (63%) or hematopoietic cell transplant (29%). Seventeen and 21 subjects were in the LD and NLD groups, respectively. Median time-to-CMV eradication was 17 days (LD group) versus 13 days (NLD group), p = 0.823. Median time-to-CMV clearance was also non-significant (p = 0.505). There was no association between initial foscarnet dosing intensity and acute kidney injury, hematologic toxicity, or mortality (24% in both groups). These findings suggest outcomes may be sensitive to other factors and underscore the need for further studies to improve understanding of foscarnet dosing in immunosuppressed patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.09.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2290897691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1386653219301969</els_id><sourcerecordid>2290897691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d26d554e9b0eddfe655ec513b6c624d189f4cafccd055f238e11a354bb897563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFr4zAQhcXSsk3T_oC9LDruxalkWYrNnkrYbQuFQsldyNK4VbCtrEb2kn9fhbQ9FgZmBr73mHmE_OBsxRlXN7vVzs6rkvFmxXIx_o0seL0WhWzU-izPolaFkqK8IJeIuwxIUa2_kwvBJa-yxYJ0z2DDMMDowNEuoDVxhERdQKAe6RgSNYjBepMy8N-nV-qHfQxz3sKUshaQ-pHaQ8rji-nD7OOEFE0_mxeg6RWi2R-uyHlneoTr974k279_tpv74vHp7mFz-1hYIUUqXKmclBU0LQPnOlBSgpVctMqqsnK8brrKms5ax6TsSlED50bIqm3rZi2VWJJfJ9t84b8JMOnBo4W-NyOECXVZNiyTquEZ5SfUxoAYodP76AcTD5ozfUxX73ROVx_T1SwXO2p-vttP7QDuU_ERZwZ-nwDIP84eokbrYbTgfASbtAv-C_s36yGNGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290897691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recommended foscarnet dose is not associated with improved outcomes in cytomegalovirus salvage therapy</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Spinner, Michael L. ; Lam, Simon W. ; Koval, Christine E. ; Athans, Vasilios</creator><creatorcontrib>Spinner, Michael L. ; Lam, Simon W. ; Koval, Christine E. ; Athans, Vasilios</creatorcontrib><description>•Foscarnet dosing is frequently discordant with package insert recommendations.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of CMV eradication.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of acute kidney injury. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir have proven efficacy but are limited by resistance and toxicity, whereas foscarnet typically retains activity when CMV has become resistant to other antivirals. Foscarnet dosing used in practice may be discordant with what is recommended in product labeling, as the result of an unconventional dosing nomogram or prescriber preference; however, it is unknown how discordant foscarnet dosing affects outcomes. Our purpose was to characterize the relationship between initial foscarnet dosing intensity (relative to product labeling) and key effectiveness and safety endpoints. This single-center, retrospective study included immunosuppressed adults with CMV viremia who received foscarnet between January 2012–July 2017. Subjects were divided into low dose (LD) and non-low dose (NLD) groups, according to foscarnet dose intensity. The primary endpoint was time-to-CMV eradication. Secondary endpoints included time-to-CMV clearance, acute kidney injury, hematologic toxicity, and mortality. Of 87 subjects, 38 met inclusion. Primary immunosuppression reasons were solid organ (63%) or hematopoietic cell transplant (29%). Seventeen and 21 subjects were in the LD and NLD groups, respectively. Median time-to-CMV eradication was 17 days (LD group) versus 13 days (NLD group), p = 0.823. Median time-to-CMV clearance was also non-significant (p = 0.505). There was no association between initial foscarnet dosing intensity and acute kidney injury, hematologic toxicity, or mortality (24% in both groups). These findings suggest outcomes may be sensitive to other factors and underscore the need for further studies to improve understanding of foscarnet dosing in immunosuppressed patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6532</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.09.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31514101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cytomegalovirus ; Dosing ; Foscarnet ; Salvage therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical virology, 2019-11, Vol.120, p.12-16</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d26d554e9b0eddfe655ec513b6c624d189f4cafccd055f238e11a354bb897563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d26d554e9b0eddfe655ec513b6c624d189f4cafccd055f238e11a354bb897563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0919-1873 ; 0000-0002-8627-8411</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31514101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spinner, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Simon W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koval, Christine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athans, Vasilios</creatorcontrib><title>Recommended foscarnet dose is not associated with improved outcomes in cytomegalovirus salvage therapy</title><title>Journal of clinical virology</title><addtitle>J Clin Virol</addtitle><description>•Foscarnet dosing is frequently discordant with package insert recommendations.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of CMV eradication.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of acute kidney injury. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir have proven efficacy but are limited by resistance and toxicity, whereas foscarnet typically retains activity when CMV has become resistant to other antivirals. Foscarnet dosing used in practice may be discordant with what is recommended in product labeling, as the result of an unconventional dosing nomogram or prescriber preference; however, it is unknown how discordant foscarnet dosing affects outcomes. Our purpose was to characterize the relationship between initial foscarnet dosing intensity (relative to product labeling) and key effectiveness and safety endpoints. This single-center, retrospective study included immunosuppressed adults with CMV viremia who received foscarnet between January 2012–July 2017. Subjects were divided into low dose (LD) and non-low dose (NLD) groups, according to foscarnet dose intensity. The primary endpoint was time-to-CMV eradication. Secondary endpoints included time-to-CMV clearance, acute kidney injury, hematologic toxicity, and mortality. Of 87 subjects, 38 met inclusion. Primary immunosuppression reasons were solid organ (63%) or hematopoietic cell transplant (29%). Seventeen and 21 subjects were in the LD and NLD groups, respectively. Median time-to-CMV eradication was 17 days (LD group) versus 13 days (NLD group), p = 0.823. Median time-to-CMV clearance was also non-significant (p = 0.505). There was no association between initial foscarnet dosing intensity and acute kidney injury, hematologic toxicity, or mortality (24% in both groups). These findings suggest outcomes may be sensitive to other factors and underscore the need for further studies to improve understanding of foscarnet dosing in immunosuppressed patients.</description><subject>Cytomegalovirus</subject><subject>Dosing</subject><subject>Foscarnet</subject><subject>Salvage therapy</subject><issn>1386-6532</issn><issn>1873-5967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFr4zAQhcXSsk3T_oC9LDruxalkWYrNnkrYbQuFQsldyNK4VbCtrEb2kn9fhbQ9FgZmBr73mHmE_OBsxRlXN7vVzs6rkvFmxXIx_o0seL0WhWzU-izPolaFkqK8IJeIuwxIUa2_kwvBJa-yxYJ0z2DDMMDowNEuoDVxhERdQKAe6RgSNYjBepMy8N-nV-qHfQxz3sKUshaQ-pHaQ8rji-nD7OOEFE0_mxeg6RWi2R-uyHlneoTr974k279_tpv74vHp7mFz-1hYIUUqXKmclBU0LQPnOlBSgpVctMqqsnK8brrKms5ax6TsSlED50bIqm3rZi2VWJJfJ9t84b8JMOnBo4W-NyOECXVZNiyTquEZ5SfUxoAYodP76AcTD5ozfUxX73ROVx_T1SwXO2p-vttP7QDuU_ERZwZ-nwDIP84eokbrYbTgfASbtAv-C_s36yGNGg</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Spinner, Michael L.</creator><creator>Lam, Simon W.</creator><creator>Koval, Christine E.</creator><creator>Athans, Vasilios</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-1873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-8411</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Recommended foscarnet dose is not associated with improved outcomes in cytomegalovirus salvage therapy</title><author>Spinner, Michael L. ; Lam, Simon W. ; Koval, Christine E. ; Athans, Vasilios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d26d554e9b0eddfe655ec513b6c624d189f4cafccd055f238e11a354bb897563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cytomegalovirus</topic><topic>Dosing</topic><topic>Foscarnet</topic><topic>Salvage therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spinner, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Simon W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koval, Christine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athans, Vasilios</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spinner, Michael L.</au><au>Lam, Simon W.</au><au>Koval, Christine E.</au><au>Athans, Vasilios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recommended foscarnet dose is not associated with improved outcomes in cytomegalovirus salvage therapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical virology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Virol</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>120</volume><spage>12</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>12-16</pages><issn>1386-6532</issn><eissn>1873-5967</eissn><abstract>•Foscarnet dosing is frequently discordant with package insert recommendations.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of CMV eradication.•Foscarnet dose intensity was not associated with rate of acute kidney injury. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir have proven efficacy but are limited by resistance and toxicity, whereas foscarnet typically retains activity when CMV has become resistant to other antivirals. Foscarnet dosing used in practice may be discordant with what is recommended in product labeling, as the result of an unconventional dosing nomogram or prescriber preference; however, it is unknown how discordant foscarnet dosing affects outcomes. Our purpose was to characterize the relationship between initial foscarnet dosing intensity (relative to product labeling) and key effectiveness and safety endpoints. This single-center, retrospective study included immunosuppressed adults with CMV viremia who received foscarnet between January 2012–July 2017. Subjects were divided into low dose (LD) and non-low dose (NLD) groups, according to foscarnet dose intensity. The primary endpoint was time-to-CMV eradication. Secondary endpoints included time-to-CMV clearance, acute kidney injury, hematologic toxicity, and mortality. Of 87 subjects, 38 met inclusion. Primary immunosuppression reasons were solid organ (63%) or hematopoietic cell transplant (29%). Seventeen and 21 subjects were in the LD and NLD groups, respectively. Median time-to-CMV eradication was 17 days (LD group) versus 13 days (NLD group), p = 0.823. Median time-to-CMV clearance was also non-significant (p = 0.505). There was no association between initial foscarnet dosing intensity and acute kidney injury, hematologic toxicity, or mortality (24% in both groups). These findings suggest outcomes may be sensitive to other factors and underscore the need for further studies to improve understanding of foscarnet dosing in immunosuppressed patients.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31514101</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcv.2019.09.001</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-1873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-8411</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-6532
ispartof Journal of clinical virology, 2019-11, Vol.120, p.12-16
issn 1386-6532
1873-5967
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2290897691
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cytomegalovirus
Dosing
Foscarnet
Salvage therapy
title Recommended foscarnet dose is not associated with improved outcomes in cytomegalovirus salvage therapy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A50%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recommended%20foscarnet%20dose%20is%20not%20associated%20with%20improved%20outcomes%20in%20cytomegalovirus%20salvage%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20virology&rft.au=Spinner,%20Michael%20L.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=120&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=12-16&rft.issn=1386-6532&rft.eissn=1873-5967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcv.2019.09.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2290897691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d26d554e9b0eddfe655ec513b6c624d189f4cafccd055f238e11a354bb897563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290897691&rft_id=info:pmid/31514101&rfr_iscdi=true