Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Perpetration: A Meta-Analysis

Teen dating violence (TDV) is a common problem among adolescents and has been linked to various negative outcomes. This study used Dutton’s nested ecological theory to examine risk markers for physical TDV perpetration and examine whether there are significant differences in the strength of risk mar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trauma, Violence, & Abuse Violence, & Abuse, 2021-07, Vol.22 (3), p.619-631
Main Authors: Spencer, Chelsea M., Toews, Michelle L., Anders, Kristin M., Emanuels, Sarah K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescents
Aggression
Conflict resolution
Dating
Delinquency
Domestic violence
Females
Gender differences
Intimate partner violence
Males
Markers
Meta-analysis
Ontogeny
Risk
Risk factors
Sexual behavior
Teenagers
Victimization
Violence
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Teen dating violence (TDV) is a common problem among adolescents and has been linked to various negative outcomes. This study used Dutton’s nested ecological theory to examine risk markers for physical TDV perpetration and examine whether there are significant differences in the strength of risk markers between male and female adolescents. This meta-analysis included 37 studies yielding 126 unique effect sizes for risk markers for physical TDV perpetration in samples from the United States. In the microsystem level, a total of 14 risk markers were examined and in the ontogenetic level, 12 risk markers were examined. Our results revealed that, in the microsystem, physical TDV victimization was the strongest risk marker for physical TDV perpetration. On the ontogenetic level, externalizing behaviors, approval of violence, risky sexual behaviors, alcohol use, depression, and delinquency were the strongest risk markers for TDV perpetration. Conflict resolution skills and responsibility were protective markers against TDV perpetration. When comparing the strength of risk markers between males and females, we found that undifferentiated TDV perpetration and depression were significantly stronger risk markers for female perpetration than male perpetration. We also found that exhibiting controlling behaviors was a significantly stronger risk marker for male TDV perpetration than female TDV perpetration. These findings highlight the importance of the microsystem, specifically the dating relationship itself, when identifying adolescents at risk for TDV perpetration.
ISSN:1524-8380
1552-8324
DOI:10.1177/1524838019875700