Loading…
Multiple-dose versus single-dose ivermectin for Strongyloides stercoralis infection (Strong Treat 1 to 4): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial
Strongyloides stercoralis infection is a neglected condition that places people who are immunocompromised at risk of hyperinfection and death. Ivermectin is the drug of choice for the treatment of S stercoralis infection, but there is no definitive evidence on the optimal dose. This trial aimed to a...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Lancet infectious diseases 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.1181-1190 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-261a62dfd751f6b9ee054607c0f1b14b171d006baf86eb28435f84f125c4fcf03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-261a62dfd751f6b9ee054607c0f1b14b171d006baf86eb28435f84f125c4fcf03 |
container_end_page | 1190 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1181 |
container_title | The Lancet infectious diseases |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Buonfrate, Dora Salas-Coronas, Joaquin Muñoz, José Maruri, Begoña Trevino Rodari, Paola Castelli, Francesco Zammarchi, Lorenzo Bianchi, Leila Gobbi, Federico Cabezas-Fernández, Teresa Requena-Mendez, Ana Godbole, Gauri Silva, Ronaldo Romero, Marilena Chiodini, Peter L Bisoffi, Zeno |
description | Strongyloides stercoralis infection is a neglected condition that places people who are immunocompromised at risk of hyperinfection and death. Ivermectin is the drug of choice for the treatment of S stercoralis infection, but there is no definitive evidence on the optimal dose. This trial aimed to assess whether multiple doses of ivermectin were superior to a single dose for the treatment of non-disseminated strongyloidiasis.
Our study was designed as a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial. Participants were enrolled in four centres in Italy, three in Spain, and two in the UK, and recruiting sites were predominantly hospitals. Eligible patients were older than 5 years, weighed more than 15 kg, were residents in an area not endemic for S stercoralis, and either were positive for S stercoralis in faecal tests and on serology (any titre) or had a positive serological test with high titres, irrespective of the result of faecal tests. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated, blinded allocation sequence (with randomly mixed block sizes of six, eight, and ten participants) to receive either one dose of ivermectin 200 μg/kg or four doses of ivermectin 200 μg/kg (given on days 1, 2, 15, and 16). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with clearance of S stercoralis infection at 12 months, which was assessed in all randomly assigned participants who were not lost to follow-up (modified full-analysis set) and in participants in the modified full-analysis set who did not deviate from the assigned treatment regimen (per-protocol set). All participants were included in the safety analysis. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01570504, and is now closed for recruitment.
Of the 351 patients assessed for eligibility, 309 recruited between March 26, 2013, and May 3, 2017, were randomly assigned to one dose (n=155) or four doses (n=154) of ivermectin. At 12 months in the modified full-analysis set, 86% (95% CI 79 to 91; 102 of 118 participants) had responded to treatment in the single-dose group compared with 85% (77 to 90; 96 of 113 participants) in the four-dose group (risk difference 1·48%, 95% CI −7·55 to 10·52; p=0·75); similar results were observed in the per-protocol set. Adverse events were generally of mild intensity and more frequent in the multiple-dose than in the single-dose group. The trial was terminated early due to futility.
Multiple doses of ivermectin did not sh |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30289-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2299136313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1473309919302890</els_id><sourcerecordid>2308009868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-261a62dfd751f6b9ee054607c0f1b14b171d006baf86eb28435f84f125c4fcf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vFSEUxSdGY2v1I2hI3LwmbxQG5g9ujGn8l9S4aF0TBi6VhoERmCbvi_n5ZN60Lty44ubkxz0n91TVS4LfEEy6t1eE9bSmmPMd4ecUNwOv8aPqtMisZqztHx_nDTmpnqV0izHpCWZPqxNK2nagfXda_f62uGxnB7UOCdAdxLQklKy_eZBs0SZQ2XpkQkRXOQZ_c3DBaihghqhClM4mZL1ZseDRboPQdQSZEUE5IHb-Dkk0rWYKfI6wR2EGXzs5gtuj-acsVnSPovQ6TDaBRioULjhXxrTMEG2INh9Qjla659UTI12CF_fvWfXj08friy_15ffPXy8-XNaK8SbXTUdk12ij-5aYbuQAuGUd7hU2ZCRsLPfQGHejNEMHYzMw2pqBGdK0ihllMD2rdtveOYZfC6QsSjYFzkkPYUmiaTgntKOEFvT1P-htWKIv6URD8YAxH7qhUO1GqRhSimDEHO0k40EQLNZixbFYsbYmCBfHYsUa5NX99mWcQP_99dBkAd5vAJRz3FmIIikLXoG2sdQidLD_sfgDI--1bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2308009868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple-dose versus single-dose ivermectin for Strongyloides stercoralis infection (Strong Treat 1 to 4): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Buonfrate, Dora ; Salas-Coronas, Joaquin ; Muñoz, José ; Maruri, Begoña Trevino ; Rodari, Paola ; Castelli, Francesco ; Zammarchi, Lorenzo ; Bianchi, Leila ; Gobbi, Federico ; Cabezas-Fernández, Teresa ; Requena-Mendez, Ana ; Godbole, Gauri ; Silva, Ronaldo ; Romero, Marilena ; Chiodini, Peter L ; Bisoffi, Zeno</creator><creatorcontrib>Buonfrate, Dora ; Salas-Coronas, Joaquin ; Muñoz, José ; Maruri, Begoña Trevino ; Rodari, Paola ; Castelli, Francesco ; Zammarchi, Lorenzo ; Bianchi, Leila ; Gobbi, Federico ; Cabezas-Fernández, Teresa ; Requena-Mendez, Ana ; Godbole, Gauri ; Silva, Ronaldo ; Romero, Marilena ; Chiodini, Peter L ; Bisoffi, Zeno</creatorcontrib><description>Strongyloides stercoralis infection is a neglected condition that places people who are immunocompromised at risk of hyperinfection and death. Ivermectin is the drug of choice for the treatment of S stercoralis infection, but there is no definitive evidence on the optimal dose. This trial aimed to assess whether multiple doses of ivermectin were superior to a single dose for the treatment of non-disseminated strongyloidiasis.
Our study was designed as a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial. Participants were enrolled in four centres in Italy, three in Spain, and two in the UK, and recruiting sites were predominantly hospitals. Eligible patients were older than 5 years, weighed more than 15 kg, were residents in an area not endemic for S stercoralis, and either were positive for S stercoralis in faecal tests and on serology (any titre) or had a positive serological test with high titres, irrespective of the result of faecal tests. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated, blinded allocation sequence (with randomly mixed block sizes of six, eight, and ten participants) to receive either one dose of ivermectin 200 μg/kg or four doses of ivermectin 200 μg/kg (given on days 1, 2, 15, and 16). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with clearance of S stercoralis infection at 12 months, which was assessed in all randomly assigned participants who were not lost to follow-up (modified full-analysis set) and in participants in the modified full-analysis set who did not deviate from the assigned treatment regimen (per-protocol set). All participants were included in the safety analysis. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01570504, and is now closed for recruitment.
Of the 351 patients assessed for eligibility, 309 recruited between March 26, 2013, and May 3, 2017, were randomly assigned to one dose (n=155) or four doses (n=154) of ivermectin. At 12 months in the modified full-analysis set, 86% (95% CI 79 to 91; 102 of 118 participants) had responded to treatment in the single-dose group compared with 85% (77 to 90; 96 of 113 participants) in the four-dose group (risk difference 1·48%, 95% CI −7·55 to 10·52; p=0·75); similar results were observed in the per-protocol set. Adverse events were generally of mild intensity and more frequent in the multiple-dose than in the single-dose group. The trial was terminated early due to futility.
Multiple doses of ivermectin did not show higher efficacy and was tolerated less than a single dose. A single dose should therefore be preferred for the treatment of non-disseminated strongyloidiasis.
There was no funding source for this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30289-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31558376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Drug dosages ; Funding ; Hospitals ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Ivermectin ; Meta-analysis ; Pain ; Parasitic diseases ; Patients ; Pruritus ; Randomization ; Serology ; Strongyloides stercoralis ; Strongyloidiasis ; Tropical diseases</subject><ispartof>The Lancet infectious diseases, 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.1181-1190</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-261a62dfd751f6b9ee054607c0f1b14b171d006baf86eb28435f84f125c4fcf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-261a62dfd751f6b9ee054607c0f1b14b171d006baf86eb28435f84f125c4fcf03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buonfrate, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas-Coronas, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruri, Begoña Trevino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodari, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammarchi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gobbi, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabezas-Fernández, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena-Mendez, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godbole, Gauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Ronaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Marilena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiodini, Peter L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisoffi, Zeno</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple-dose versus single-dose ivermectin for Strongyloides stercoralis infection (Strong Treat 1 to 4): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial</title><title>The Lancet infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Strongyloides stercoralis infection is a neglected condition that places people who are immunocompromised at risk of hyperinfection and death. Ivermectin is the drug of choice for the treatment of S stercoralis infection, but there is no definitive evidence on the optimal dose. This trial aimed to assess whether multiple doses of ivermectin were superior to a single dose for the treatment of non-disseminated strongyloidiasis.
Our study was designed as a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial. Participants were enrolled in four centres in Italy, three in Spain, and two in the UK, and recruiting sites were predominantly hospitals. Eligible patients were older than 5 years, weighed more than 15 kg, were residents in an area not endemic for S stercoralis, and either were positive for S stercoralis in faecal tests and on serology (any titre) or had a positive serological test with high titres, irrespective of the result of faecal tests. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated, blinded allocation sequence (with randomly mixed block sizes of six, eight, and ten participants) to receive either one dose of ivermectin 200 μg/kg or four doses of ivermectin 200 μg/kg (given on days 1, 2, 15, and 16). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with clearance of S stercoralis infection at 12 months, which was assessed in all randomly assigned participants who were not lost to follow-up (modified full-analysis set) and in participants in the modified full-analysis set who did not deviate from the assigned treatment regimen (per-protocol set). All participants were included in the safety analysis. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01570504, and is now closed for recruitment.
Of the 351 patients assessed for eligibility, 309 recruited between March 26, 2013, and May 3, 2017, were randomly assigned to one dose (n=155) or four doses (n=154) of ivermectin. At 12 months in the modified full-analysis set, 86% (95% CI 79 to 91; 102 of 118 participants) had responded to treatment in the single-dose group compared with 85% (77 to 90; 96 of 113 participants) in the four-dose group (risk difference 1·48%, 95% CI −7·55 to 10·52; p=0·75); similar results were observed in the per-protocol set. Adverse events were generally of mild intensity and more frequent in the multiple-dose than in the single-dose group. The trial was terminated early due to futility.
Multiple doses of ivermectin did not show higher efficacy and was tolerated less than a single dose. A single dose should therefore be preferred for the treatment of non-disseminated strongyloidiasis.
There was no funding source for this study.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Ivermectin</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pruritus</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Strongyloides stercoralis</subject><subject>Strongyloidiasis</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><issn>1473-3099</issn><issn>1474-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9vFSEUxSdGY2v1I2hI3LwmbxQG5g9ujGn8l9S4aF0TBi6VhoERmCbvi_n5ZN60Lty44ubkxz0n91TVS4LfEEy6t1eE9bSmmPMd4ecUNwOv8aPqtMisZqztHx_nDTmpnqV0izHpCWZPqxNK2nagfXda_f62uGxnB7UOCdAdxLQklKy_eZBs0SZQ2XpkQkRXOQZ_c3DBaihghqhClM4mZL1ZseDRboPQdQSZEUE5IHb-Dkk0rWYKfI6wR2EGXzs5gtuj-acsVnSPovQ6TDaBRioULjhXxrTMEG2INh9Qjla659UTI12CF_fvWfXj08friy_15ffPXy8-XNaK8SbXTUdk12ij-5aYbuQAuGUd7hU2ZCRsLPfQGHejNEMHYzMw2pqBGdK0ihllMD2rdtveOYZfC6QsSjYFzkkPYUmiaTgntKOEFvT1P-htWKIv6URD8YAxH7qhUO1GqRhSimDEHO0k40EQLNZixbFYsbYmCBfHYsUa5NX99mWcQP_99dBkAd5vAJRz3FmIIikLXoG2sdQidLD_sfgDI--1bw</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Buonfrate, Dora</creator><creator>Salas-Coronas, Joaquin</creator><creator>Muñoz, José</creator><creator>Maruri, Begoña Trevino</creator><creator>Rodari, Paola</creator><creator>Castelli, Francesco</creator><creator>Zammarchi, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Bianchi, Leila</creator><creator>Gobbi, Federico</creator><creator>Cabezas-Fernández, Teresa</creator><creator>Requena-Mendez, Ana</creator><creator>Godbole, Gauri</creator><creator>Silva, Ronaldo</creator><creator>Romero, Marilena</creator><creator>Chiodini, Peter L</creator><creator>Bisoffi, Zeno</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Multiple-dose versus single-dose ivermectin for Strongyloides stercoralis infection (Strong Treat 1 to 4): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial</title><author>Buonfrate, Dora ; Salas-Coronas, Joaquin ; Muñoz, José ; Maruri, Begoña Trevino ; Rodari, Paola ; Castelli, Francesco ; Zammarchi, Lorenzo ; Bianchi, Leila ; Gobbi, Federico ; Cabezas-Fernández, Teresa ; Requena-Mendez, Ana ; Godbole, Gauri ; Silva, Ronaldo ; Romero, Marilena ; Chiodini, Peter L ; Bisoffi, Zeno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-261a62dfd751f6b9ee054607c0f1b14b171d006baf86eb28435f84f125c4fcf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Ivermectin</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pruritus</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Strongyloides stercoralis</topic><topic>Strongyloidiasis</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buonfrate, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas-Coronas, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruri, Begoña Trevino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodari, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammarchi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gobbi, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabezas-Fernández, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena-Mendez, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godbole, Gauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Ronaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Marilena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiodini, Peter L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisoffi, Zeno</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buonfrate, Dora</au><au>Salas-Coronas, Joaquin</au><au>Muñoz, José</au><au>Maruri, Begoña Trevino</au><au>Rodari, Paola</au><au>Castelli, Francesco</au><au>Zammarchi, Lorenzo</au><au>Bianchi, Leila</au><au>Gobbi, Federico</au><au>Cabezas-Fernández, Teresa</au><au>Requena-Mendez, Ana</au><au>Godbole, Gauri</au><au>Silva, Ronaldo</au><au>Romero, Marilena</au><au>Chiodini, Peter L</au><au>Bisoffi, Zeno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple-dose versus single-dose ivermectin for Strongyloides stercoralis infection (Strong Treat 1 to 4): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1181</spage><epage>1190</epage><pages>1181-1190</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><eissn>1474-4457</eissn><abstract>Strongyloides stercoralis infection is a neglected condition that places people who are immunocompromised at risk of hyperinfection and death. Ivermectin is the drug of choice for the treatment of S stercoralis infection, but there is no definitive evidence on the optimal dose. This trial aimed to assess whether multiple doses of ivermectin were superior to a single dose for the treatment of non-disseminated strongyloidiasis.
Our study was designed as a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial. Participants were enrolled in four centres in Italy, three in Spain, and two in the UK, and recruiting sites were predominantly hospitals. Eligible patients were older than 5 years, weighed more than 15 kg, were residents in an area not endemic for S stercoralis, and either were positive for S stercoralis in faecal tests and on serology (any titre) or had a positive serological test with high titres, irrespective of the result of faecal tests. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated, blinded allocation sequence (with randomly mixed block sizes of six, eight, and ten participants) to receive either one dose of ivermectin 200 μg/kg or four doses of ivermectin 200 μg/kg (given on days 1, 2, 15, and 16). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with clearance of S stercoralis infection at 12 months, which was assessed in all randomly assigned participants who were not lost to follow-up (modified full-analysis set) and in participants in the modified full-analysis set who did not deviate from the assigned treatment regimen (per-protocol set). All participants were included in the safety analysis. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01570504, and is now closed for recruitment.
Of the 351 patients assessed for eligibility, 309 recruited between March 26, 2013, and May 3, 2017, were randomly assigned to one dose (n=155) or four doses (n=154) of ivermectin. At 12 months in the modified full-analysis set, 86% (95% CI 79 to 91; 102 of 118 participants) had responded to treatment in the single-dose group compared with 85% (77 to 90; 96 of 113 participants) in the four-dose group (risk difference 1·48%, 95% CI −7·55 to 10·52; p=0·75); similar results were observed in the per-protocol set. Adverse events were generally of mild intensity and more frequent in the multiple-dose than in the single-dose group. The trial was terminated early due to futility.
Multiple doses of ivermectin did not show higher efficacy and was tolerated less than a single dose. A single dose should therefore be preferred for the treatment of non-disseminated strongyloidiasis.
There was no funding source for this study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31558376</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30289-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1473-3099 |
ispartof | The Lancet infectious diseases, 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.1181-1190 |
issn | 1473-3099 1474-4457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2299136313 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Abdomen Drug dosages Funding Hospitals Infections Infectious diseases Ivermectin Meta-analysis Pain Parasitic diseases Patients Pruritus Randomization Serology Strongyloides stercoralis Strongyloidiasis Tropical diseases |
title | Multiple-dose versus single-dose ivermectin for Strongyloides stercoralis infection (Strong Treat 1 to 4): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A27%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple-dose%20versus%20single-dose%20ivermectin%20for%20Strongyloides%20stercoralis%20infection%20(Strong%20Treat%201%20to%204):%20a%20multicentre,%20open-label,%20phase%203,%20randomised%20controlled%20superiority%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Buonfrate,%20Dora&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1181&rft.epage=1190&rft.pages=1181-1190&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft.eissn=1474-4457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30289-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2308009868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-261a62dfd751f6b9ee054607c0f1b14b171d006baf86eb28435f84f125c4fcf03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2308009868&rft_id=info:pmid/31558376&rfr_iscdi=true |