Loading…

Effectiveness of five instruments when removing calcium hydroxide paste from simulated internal root resorption cavities in extracted maxillary central incisors

Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of five instruments used for irrigant agitation during the removal of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] paste in simulated internal root resorption (IRR) cavities created in extracted maxillary central incisors. Methodology Seventy maxillary central incisors with a single...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International endodontic journal 2020-03, Vol.53 (3), p.366-375
Main Authors: Marques‐da‐Silva, B., Alberton, C. S., Tomazinho, F. S. F., Gabardo, M. C. L., Duarte, M. A. H., Vivan, R. R., Baratto‐Filho, F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-34b8022a88fb8b7a6a9347b6040d5bab3444bc7e9fe11d9ab4b8503799ef40fe3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-34b8022a88fb8b7a6a9347b6040d5bab3444bc7e9fe11d9ab4b8503799ef40fe3
container_end_page 375
container_issue 3
container_start_page 366
container_title International endodontic journal
container_volume 53
creator Marques‐da‐Silva, B.
Alberton, C. S.
Tomazinho, F. S. F.
Gabardo, M. C. L.
Duarte, M. A. H.
Vivan, R. R.
Baratto‐Filho, F.
description Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of five instruments used for irrigant agitation during the removal of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] paste in simulated internal root resorption (IRR) cavities created in extracted maxillary central incisors. Methodology Seventy maxillary central incisors with a single canal were selected. The canals were accessed and instrumented with Reciproc R50, then the roots were split in the bucco‐lingual direction and the halves separated. Simulated IRR cavities were created, in both halves of the roots, 5 mm from the apex with a spherical bur. The specimens were reconstructed with cyanoacrylate glue and allocated into seven groups: negative control – no treatment; positive control – filled with Ca(OH)2 without performing any irrigation protocol; the other groups were divided according to the instrument used for irrigant agitation, namely: Ultrasonic, EndoActivator®, EDDY®, XP‐endo® Finisher and XP‐endo® Shaper. The specimens were cleaved and analysed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, to compare the Ca(OH)2 remnants between them. Then, the IRR cavities created by the burs were cleaned and subjected to a protocol of demineralization with 20% nitric acid, the roots reconstructed, and the irrigant agitation methods, as well as the microscopic analysis was repeated. Analysis of the images of Ca(OH)2 remaining in the simulated IRR cavities after irrigation was performed by two calibrated examiners based on a previously established scoring system. The data were statistically compared by Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney U‐test and Wilcoxon tests, with the significance level set at 5%. Results There was a significant difference in the effectiveness of the instruments in relation to the cavity creation method (bur vs. bur/acid) and evaluation method (optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy) (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iej.13223
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2299457671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353006106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-34b8022a88fb8b7a6a9347b6040d5bab3444bc7e9fe11d9ab4b8503799ef40fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFvFCEYhonR2G314B8wJF7aw7QwMMzM0TSr1jTxoucJw3xYNgOswGx3_40_1W_d6sFELnB43gc-XkLecHbNcd042FxzUdfiGVlxoZqqbnr-nKwYl6Kqu645I-c5bxhjDRP8JTkTvFGqbdSK_FxbC6a4HQTImUZLLZ6pC7mkxUMomT4-QKAJfNy58J0aPRu3ePpwmFLcuwnoVucC1KboaXZ-mXWBCQUFUtAzTTEWTOeYtsXFgPmdKw4yEhT2JWlzxL3eu3nW6UAN3pkw54JxGMqvyAur5wyvn_YL8u3D-uvtp-r-y8e72_f3lZG8F5WQY8fqWnedHbux1Ur3QrajYpJNzahHIaUcTQu9Bc6nXo_I42e0fQ9WMgviglyevNsUfyyQy-BdNoCPChCXPNR138umVS1H9N0_6CYux2GREo1gTHGmkLo6USbFnBPYYZucxxEHzoZjbQPWNvyuDdm3T8Zl9DD9Jf_0hMDNCXh0Mxz-bxru1p9Pyl9-2KW6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353006106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of five instruments when removing calcium hydroxide paste from simulated internal root resorption cavities in extracted maxillary central incisors</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Marques‐da‐Silva, B. ; Alberton, C. S. ; Tomazinho, F. S. F. ; Gabardo, M. C. L. ; Duarte, M. A. H. ; Vivan, R. R. ; Baratto‐Filho, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marques‐da‐Silva, B. ; Alberton, C. S. ; Tomazinho, F. S. F. ; Gabardo, M. C. L. ; Duarte, M. A. H. ; Vivan, R. R. ; Baratto‐Filho, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of five instruments used for irrigant agitation during the removal of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] paste in simulated internal root resorption (IRR) cavities created in extracted maxillary central incisors. Methodology Seventy maxillary central incisors with a single canal were selected. The canals were accessed and instrumented with Reciproc R50, then the roots were split in the bucco‐lingual direction and the halves separated. Simulated IRR cavities were created, in both halves of the roots, 5 mm from the apex with a spherical bur. The specimens were reconstructed with cyanoacrylate glue and allocated into seven groups: negative control – no treatment; positive control – filled with Ca(OH)2 without performing any irrigation protocol; the other groups were divided according to the instrument used for irrigant agitation, namely: Ultrasonic, EndoActivator®, EDDY®, XP‐endo® Finisher and XP‐endo® Shaper. The specimens were cleaved and analysed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, to compare the Ca(OH)2 remnants between them. Then, the IRR cavities created by the burs were cleaned and subjected to a protocol of demineralization with 20% nitric acid, the roots reconstructed, and the irrigant agitation methods, as well as the microscopic analysis was repeated. Analysis of the images of Ca(OH)2 remaining in the simulated IRR cavities after irrigation was performed by two calibrated examiners based on a previously established scoring system. The data were statistically compared by Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney U‐test and Wilcoxon tests, with the significance level set at 5%. Results There was a significant difference in the effectiveness of the instruments in relation to the cavity creation method (bur vs. bur/acid) and evaluation method (optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy) (P &lt; 0.05). The XP‐endo® Finisher and EDDY® groups were associated with significantly more effective removal of Ca(OH)2 when the IRR cavities were created using the acid protocol and analysed by scanning electron microscopy. Conclusion None of the instruments tested were able to completely remove the Ca(OH)2 paste from the simulated IRR cavities; however, the EDDY® and XP‐endo® Finisher removed more Ca(OH)2 in the bur/acid cavity creation method analysed by scanning electron microscopy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iej.13223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31566756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acids ; Calcium Hydroxide ; Cavities ; Demineralization ; Dental Caries ; Dental Pulp Cavity ; Dental restorative materials ; Dental roots ; Dentistry ; Electron microscopes ; Endodontics ; Humans ; Incisor ; Incisors ; internal root resorption ; Irrigation ; Lavage ; Light microscopy ; Maxilla ; Nitric acid ; Root Canal Irrigants ; Root Canal Preparation ; Root canals ; Root Resorption ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Therapeutic Irrigation</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2020-03, Vol.53 (3), p.366-375</ispartof><rights>2019 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-34b8022a88fb8b7a6a9347b6040d5bab3444bc7e9fe11d9ab4b8503799ef40fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-34b8022a88fb8b7a6a9347b6040d5bab3444bc7e9fe11d9ab4b8503799ef40fe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6832-8158 ; 0000-0001-5553-6943 ; 0000-0003-3051-737X ; 0000-0002-5649-7234 ; 0000-0002-0419-5699</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marques‐da‐Silva, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberton, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomazinho, F. S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabardo, M. C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, M. A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivan, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baratto‐Filho, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of five instruments when removing calcium hydroxide paste from simulated internal root resorption cavities in extracted maxillary central incisors</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of five instruments used for irrigant agitation during the removal of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] paste in simulated internal root resorption (IRR) cavities created in extracted maxillary central incisors. Methodology Seventy maxillary central incisors with a single canal were selected. The canals were accessed and instrumented with Reciproc R50, then the roots were split in the bucco‐lingual direction and the halves separated. Simulated IRR cavities were created, in both halves of the roots, 5 mm from the apex with a spherical bur. The specimens were reconstructed with cyanoacrylate glue and allocated into seven groups: negative control – no treatment; positive control – filled with Ca(OH)2 without performing any irrigation protocol; the other groups were divided according to the instrument used for irrigant agitation, namely: Ultrasonic, EndoActivator®, EDDY®, XP‐endo® Finisher and XP‐endo® Shaper. The specimens were cleaved and analysed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, to compare the Ca(OH)2 remnants between them. Then, the IRR cavities created by the burs were cleaned and subjected to a protocol of demineralization with 20% nitric acid, the roots reconstructed, and the irrigant agitation methods, as well as the microscopic analysis was repeated. Analysis of the images of Ca(OH)2 remaining in the simulated IRR cavities after irrigation was performed by two calibrated examiners based on a previously established scoring system. The data were statistically compared by Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney U‐test and Wilcoxon tests, with the significance level set at 5%. Results There was a significant difference in the effectiveness of the instruments in relation to the cavity creation method (bur vs. bur/acid) and evaluation method (optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy) (P &lt; 0.05). The XP‐endo® Finisher and EDDY® groups were associated with significantly more effective removal of Ca(OH)2 when the IRR cavities were created using the acid protocol and analysed by scanning electron microscopy. Conclusion None of the instruments tested were able to completely remove the Ca(OH)2 paste from the simulated IRR cavities; however, the EDDY® and XP‐endo® Finisher removed more Ca(OH)2 in the bur/acid cavity creation method analysed by scanning electron microscopy.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Calcium Hydroxide</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Demineralization</subject><subject>Dental Caries</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dental roots</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Electron microscopes</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisor</subject><subject>Incisors</subject><subject>internal root resorption</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Lavage</subject><subject>Light microscopy</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Nitric acid</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Root Resorption</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFvFCEYhonR2G314B8wJF7aw7QwMMzM0TSr1jTxoucJw3xYNgOswGx3_40_1W_d6sFELnB43gc-XkLecHbNcd042FxzUdfiGVlxoZqqbnr-nKwYl6Kqu645I-c5bxhjDRP8JTkTvFGqbdSK_FxbC6a4HQTImUZLLZ6pC7mkxUMomT4-QKAJfNy58J0aPRu3ePpwmFLcuwnoVucC1KboaXZ-mXWBCQUFUtAzTTEWTOeYtsXFgPmdKw4yEhT2JWlzxL3eu3nW6UAN3pkw54JxGMqvyAur5wyvn_YL8u3D-uvtp-r-y8e72_f3lZG8F5WQY8fqWnedHbux1Ur3QrajYpJNzahHIaUcTQu9Bc6nXo_I42e0fQ9WMgviglyevNsUfyyQy-BdNoCPChCXPNR138umVS1H9N0_6CYux2GREo1gTHGmkLo6USbFnBPYYZucxxEHzoZjbQPWNvyuDdm3T8Zl9DD9Jf_0hMDNCXh0Mxz-bxru1p9Pyl9-2KW6</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Marques‐da‐Silva, B.</creator><creator>Alberton, C. S.</creator><creator>Tomazinho, F. S. F.</creator><creator>Gabardo, M. C. L.</creator><creator>Duarte, M. A. H.</creator><creator>Vivan, R. R.</creator><creator>Baratto‐Filho, F.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6832-8158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-6943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-737X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-7234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-5699</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of five instruments when removing calcium hydroxide paste from simulated internal root resorption cavities in extracted maxillary central incisors</title><author>Marques‐da‐Silva, B. ; Alberton, C. S. ; Tomazinho, F. S. F. ; Gabardo, M. C. L. ; Duarte, M. A. H. ; Vivan, R. R. ; Baratto‐Filho, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-34b8022a88fb8b7a6a9347b6040d5bab3444bc7e9fe11d9ab4b8503799ef40fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Calcium Hydroxide</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Demineralization</topic><topic>Dental Caries</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dental roots</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Electron microscopes</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisor</topic><topic>Incisors</topic><topic>internal root resorption</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Lavage</topic><topic>Light microscopy</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Nitric acid</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Root Resorption</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marques‐da‐Silva, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberton, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomazinho, F. S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabardo, M. C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, M. A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivan, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baratto‐Filho, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marques‐da‐Silva, B.</au><au>Alberton, C. S.</au><au>Tomazinho, F. S. F.</au><au>Gabardo, M. C. L.</au><au>Duarte, M. A. H.</au><au>Vivan, R. R.</au><au>Baratto‐Filho, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of five instruments when removing calcium hydroxide paste from simulated internal root resorption cavities in extracted maxillary central incisors</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>366</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>366-375</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of five instruments used for irrigant agitation during the removal of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] paste in simulated internal root resorption (IRR) cavities created in extracted maxillary central incisors. Methodology Seventy maxillary central incisors with a single canal were selected. The canals were accessed and instrumented with Reciproc R50, then the roots were split in the bucco‐lingual direction and the halves separated. Simulated IRR cavities were created, in both halves of the roots, 5 mm from the apex with a spherical bur. The specimens were reconstructed with cyanoacrylate glue and allocated into seven groups: negative control – no treatment; positive control – filled with Ca(OH)2 without performing any irrigation protocol; the other groups were divided according to the instrument used for irrigant agitation, namely: Ultrasonic, EndoActivator®, EDDY®, XP‐endo® Finisher and XP‐endo® Shaper. The specimens were cleaved and analysed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, to compare the Ca(OH)2 remnants between them. Then, the IRR cavities created by the burs were cleaned and subjected to a protocol of demineralization with 20% nitric acid, the roots reconstructed, and the irrigant agitation methods, as well as the microscopic analysis was repeated. Analysis of the images of Ca(OH)2 remaining in the simulated IRR cavities after irrigation was performed by two calibrated examiners based on a previously established scoring system. The data were statistically compared by Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney U‐test and Wilcoxon tests, with the significance level set at 5%. Results There was a significant difference in the effectiveness of the instruments in relation to the cavity creation method (bur vs. bur/acid) and evaluation method (optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy) (P &lt; 0.05). The XP‐endo® Finisher and EDDY® groups were associated with significantly more effective removal of Ca(OH)2 when the IRR cavities were created using the acid protocol and analysed by scanning electron microscopy. Conclusion None of the instruments tested were able to completely remove the Ca(OH)2 paste from the simulated IRR cavities; however, the EDDY® and XP‐endo® Finisher removed more Ca(OH)2 in the bur/acid cavity creation method analysed by scanning electron microscopy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31566756</pmid><doi>10.1111/iej.13223</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6832-8158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-6943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-737X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-7234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-5699</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-2885
ispartof International endodontic journal, 2020-03, Vol.53 (3), p.366-375
issn 0143-2885
1365-2591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2299457671
source Wiley
subjects Acids
Calcium Hydroxide
Cavities
Demineralization
Dental Caries
Dental Pulp Cavity
Dental restorative materials
Dental roots
Dentistry
Electron microscopes
Endodontics
Humans
Incisor
Incisors
internal root resorption
Irrigation
Lavage
Light microscopy
Maxilla
Nitric acid
Root Canal Irrigants
Root Canal Preparation
Root canals
Root Resorption
Scanning electron microscopy
Therapeutic Irrigation
title Effectiveness of five instruments when removing calcium hydroxide paste from simulated internal root resorption cavities in extracted maxillary central incisors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T00%3A23%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20five%20instruments%20when%20removing%20calcium%20hydroxide%20paste%20from%20simulated%20internal%20root%20resorption%20cavities%20in%20extracted%20maxillary%20central%20incisors&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Marques%E2%80%90da%E2%80%90Silva,%20B.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=366-375&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iej.13223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353006106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-34b8022a88fb8b7a6a9347b6040d5bab3444bc7e9fe11d9ab4b8503799ef40fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353006106&rft_id=info:pmid/31566756&rfr_iscdi=true