What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?

When the meta-analysis studies comparing single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) repair methods in the literature are examined, the SR method is unsuccessful in re-tears especially in large and massive tears. In this study, I was able to determine that, except for Barber’s work, double-loaded anchors we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology 2019-10, Vol.29 (7), p.1589-1590
Main Author: Deveci, Alper
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Arthroplasty
Humans
Letter to the Editor • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Rotator cuff
Rotator Cuff - surgery
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Surgical Orthopedics
Suture Anchors
Suture Techniques
Traumatic Surgery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6fb5b18d1e5e796d59ff90fbd5d765c257baaad71da7c5107d3b1fff0cfb8ac33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6fb5b18d1e5e796d59ff90fbd5d765c257baaad71da7c5107d3b1fff0cfb8ac33
container_end_page 1590
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1589
container_title European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology
container_volume 29
creator Deveci, Alper
description When the meta-analysis studies comparing single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) repair methods in the literature are examined, the SR method is unsuccessful in re-tears especially in large and massive tears. In this study, I was able to determine that, except for Barber’s work, double-loaded anchors were used for the SR repair. Particularly, low tension of the repaired muscle–tendon unit is important in terms of repairable massive retracted cuff tears. For this reason, medially placed triple-loaded anchors were developed. Again, the SR ripstop method using suture tape, in terms of re-tears and success rates, is similar to the double-row suture bridge method. Based on current systemic review and meta-analysis studies, it is not appropriate to adapt SR and DR rotator cuff repair results to today’s conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00590-019-02462-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2301429238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2300716826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6fb5b18d1e5e796d59ff90fbd5d765c257baaad71da7c5107d3b1fff0cfb8ac33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rHDEMhk1oyPcf6CEYesnFrWSP7ZlTKUvaFAK9JORoPP7YTtgdb-wZwv77erNJCj30JIEevRIPIR8RPiOA_lIAZAcMsGPAG8XZ9oCcYCM4Q1Dth9orIVgLSh6T01IeAVB2KI_IsUDUsmm6E3L38NtOdCj0OadxSYeRurTe2DyUNNIUaRnG5SowakdPfZr72uf0THPY2CGXHZ_TZKeUqZtjpFOwuXw9J4fRrkq4eK1n5P779d3iht3--vFz8e2WOaHlxFTsZY-txyCD7pSXXYwdxN5Lr5V0XOreWus1equdRNBe9BhjBBf71johzsjVPneT09McymTWQ3FhtbJjSHMxXAA2vOOireinf9DHNOexfrejQKNquaoU31Mup1JyiGaTh7XNW4Ngds7N3rmpzs2Lc7OtS5ev0XO_Dv595U1yBcQeKHU0LkP-e_s_sX8AtvWNTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300716826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Deveci, Alper</creator><creatorcontrib>Deveci, Alper</creatorcontrib><description>When the meta-analysis studies comparing single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) repair methods in the literature are examined, the SR method is unsuccessful in re-tears especially in large and massive tears. In this study, I was able to determine that, except for Barber’s work, double-loaded anchors were used for the SR repair. Particularly, low tension of the repaired muscle–tendon unit is important in terms of repairable massive retracted cuff tears. For this reason, medially placed triple-loaded anchors were developed. Again, the SR ripstop method using suture tape, in terms of re-tears and success rates, is similar to the double-row suture bridge method. Based on current systemic review and meta-analysis studies, it is not appropriate to adapt SR and DR rotator cuff repair results to today’s conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1633-8065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02462-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31175449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty ; Humans ; Letter to the Editor • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Rotator cuff ; Rotator Cuff - surgery ; Rotator Cuff Injuries ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Suture Anchors ; Suture Techniques ; Traumatic Surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthopaedic surgery &amp; traumatology, 2019-10, Vol.29 (7), p.1589-1590</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &amp; Traumatology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6fb5b18d1e5e796d59ff90fbd5d765c257baaad71da7c5107d3b1fff0cfb8ac33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6fb5b18d1e5e796d59ff90fbd5d765c257baaad71da7c5107d3b1fff0cfb8ac33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6216-3030</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31175449$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deveci, Alper</creatorcontrib><title>What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?</title><title>European journal of orthopaedic surgery &amp; traumatology</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><description>When the meta-analysis studies comparing single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) repair methods in the literature are examined, the SR method is unsuccessful in re-tears especially in large and massive tears. In this study, I was able to determine that, except for Barber’s work, double-loaded anchors were used for the SR repair. Particularly, low tension of the repaired muscle–tendon unit is important in terms of repairable massive retracted cuff tears. For this reason, medially placed triple-loaded anchors were developed. Again, the SR ripstop method using suture tape, in terms of re-tears and success rates, is similar to the double-row suture bridge method. Based on current systemic review and meta-analysis studies, it is not appropriate to adapt SR and DR rotator cuff repair results to today’s conditions.</description><subject>Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Letter to the Editor • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Rotator cuff</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff - surgery</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff Injuries</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Suture Anchors</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><issn>1633-8065</issn><issn>1432-1068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rHDEMhk1oyPcf6CEYesnFrWSP7ZlTKUvaFAK9JORoPP7YTtgdb-wZwv77erNJCj30JIEevRIPIR8RPiOA_lIAZAcMsGPAG8XZ9oCcYCM4Q1Dth9orIVgLSh6T01IeAVB2KI_IsUDUsmm6E3L38NtOdCj0OadxSYeRurTe2DyUNNIUaRnG5SowakdPfZr72uf0THPY2CGXHZ_TZKeUqZtjpFOwuXw9J4fRrkq4eK1n5P779d3iht3--vFz8e2WOaHlxFTsZY-txyCD7pSXXYwdxN5Lr5V0XOreWus1equdRNBe9BhjBBf71johzsjVPneT09McymTWQ3FhtbJjSHMxXAA2vOOireinf9DHNOexfrejQKNquaoU31Mup1JyiGaTh7XNW4Ngds7N3rmpzs2Lc7OtS5ev0XO_Dv595U1yBcQeKHU0LkP-e_s_sX8AtvWNTg</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Deveci, Alper</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6216-3030</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?</title><author>Deveci, Alper</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6fb5b18d1e5e796d59ff90fbd5d765c257baaad71da7c5107d3b1fff0cfb8ac33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Letter to the Editor • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Rotator cuff</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff - surgery</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff Injuries</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Suture Anchors</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deveci, Alper</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery &amp; traumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deveci, Alper</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery &amp; traumatology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1589</spage><epage>1590</epage><pages>1589-1590</pages><issn>1633-8065</issn><eissn>1432-1068</eissn><abstract>When the meta-analysis studies comparing single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) repair methods in the literature are examined, the SR method is unsuccessful in re-tears especially in large and massive tears. In this study, I was able to determine that, except for Barber’s work, double-loaded anchors were used for the SR repair. Particularly, low tension of the repaired muscle–tendon unit is important in terms of repairable massive retracted cuff tears. For this reason, medially placed triple-loaded anchors were developed. Again, the SR ripstop method using suture tape, in terms of re-tears and success rates, is similar to the double-row suture bridge method. Based on current systemic review and meta-analysis studies, it is not appropriate to adapt SR and DR rotator cuff repair results to today’s conditions.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><pmid>31175449</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00590-019-02462-y</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6216-3030</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1633-8065
ispartof European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology, 2019-10, Vol.29 (7), p.1589-1590
issn 1633-8065
1432-1068
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2301429238
source Springer Nature
subjects Arthroplasty
Humans
Letter to the Editor • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Rotator cuff
Rotator Cuff - surgery
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Surgical Orthopedics
Suture Anchors
Suture Techniques
Traumatic Surgery
title What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20wrong%20in%20comparison%20of%20single-%20and%20double-row%20repairs%20in%20rotator%20cuff%20tears?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20&%20traumatology&rft.au=Deveci,%20Alper&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1589&rft.epage=1590&rft.pages=1589-1590&rft.issn=1633-8065&rft.eissn=1432-1068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00590-019-02462-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2300716826%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6fb5b18d1e5e796d59ff90fbd5d765c257baaad71da7c5107d3b1fff0cfb8ac33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300716826&rft_id=info:pmid/31175449&rfr_iscdi=true