Health Technology Assessment Implementation in Ukraine: Current Status and Future Perspectives

• Published in: International journal of technology assessment in health care 2019-01, Vol.35 (5), p.393-400
• Main Authors: Csanádi, Marcell, Inotai, András, Oleshchuk, Oleksandra, Lebega, Oksana, Alexandra, Brodovskaya, Piniazhko, Oresta, Németh, Bertalan, Kaló, Zoltán
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Collaboration; Decision making; Employment; Expenditures; Funding; Health care; Health care industry; Health technology assessment; Organizational structure; Pharmaceutical industry; Polls & surveys; Reimbursement; Technology assessment; Training
• ISSN: 0266-4623; 1471-6348
• DOI: 10.1017/S0266462319000679

ObjectivesThe need for improving healthcare decision making by implementing health technology assessment (HTA) has been a top priority in Ukraine since 2016. This study sought to provide a tailor-made HTA implementation roadmap, drawing on insights from national stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted a survey using a questionnaire already applied in previous HTA research. We assessed the status of HTA when reforms were initiated in 2016 and examined perspectives on possible future developments among policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies and patient organizations.ResultsThirty-two respondents answered the survey. Forty-eight percent of respondents were not aware of HTA training in Ukraine, but 91 percent preferred having either a graduate or postgraduate training. Experts stated that funding for HTA research and for critical appraisal of HTA submissions was limited, but in the future, they would increase funding mainly from public sources. A public HTA agency with academic support was the most preferred organizational structure. Eighty-eight percent of respondents opted for full transparency, making the HTA agency's recommendations and the related appraisal reports publicly available. A great majority of participants preferred mandating the use of local data in certain categories and indicated the importance of evaluating the transferability of international evidence. Healthcare priority and cost-effectiveness were the most important criteria for decisions, applied with a soft explicit threshold.ConclusionsUkraine is in the early phase of implementing HTA and our study provides a clear vision of national stakeholders about the future directions. In addition, learning from the experiences of other countries may help the implementation process.