Cooperative Extension Gets Moving, but How? Exploration of Extension Health Educators’ Sources and Channels for Information-Seeking Practices

• Published in: American journal of health promotion 2020-02, Vol.34 (2), p.198-205
• Main Authors: Strayer, Thomas E., Kennedy, Lauren E., Balis, Laura E., Ramalingam, NithyaPriya S., Wilson, Meghan L., Harden, Samantha M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Communication; Community health care; Content analysis; Email; Female; Health Education - methods; Health Education - statistics & numerical data; Health Educators - education; Health Educators - statistics & numerical data; Health promotion; Health Promotion - methods; Health Promotion - statistics & numerical data; Health technology assessment; Humans; Information seeking behavior; Information sources; Information technology; Interviews; Male; Middle Aged; Mixed methods research; Polls & surveys; Specialists; Surveys and Questionnaires; Teachers; United States
• ISSN: 0890-1171; 2168-6602
• DOI: 10.1177/0890117119879606

Purpose: The Cooperative Extension System (Extension) has implemented concerted efforts toward health promotion in communities across the nation by acting as an intermediary between communities and universities. Little is known about how these intermediaries communicate and learn about existing evidence-based programming. This study serves to explore this gap by learning about information sources and channels used within Extension. Design: Sequential explanatory mixed methods approach. Setting: National Cooperative Extension System. Participants: Extension community-based health educators. Methods: A nationally distributed survey with follow-up semistructured interviews. Survey results were analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance test paired with Bonferroni post hoc. Transcripts were analyzed by conventional content analysis. Results: One hundred twenty-one Extension educators from 33 states responded to the survey, and 18 of 20 invited participants completed the interviews. Educators’ information seeking existed in 2 forms: (1) information sources for learning about programming and (2) channels by which this information is communicated. Extension educators reported contacting health specialists and other educators. Extension educators also reported using technological means of communication such as e-mail and Internet to reach information sources such as peers, specialists, academic journals, and so on. Conclusion: Extension state specialists were preferred as primary sources for intervention information, and technology was acknowledged as an easy contact channel. This study identifies county-based health educators’ information structures and justifies the need for future research on the role of specialists in communication efforts for educators.