Satisfaction in Academic Otolaryngology: Do Physician Demographics Impact Press Ganey Survey Scores?

• Published in: The Laryngoscope 2020-08, Vol.130 (8), p.1902-1906
• Main Authors: Tracy, Lauren F., Jabbour, Nicolette, Rubin, Batsheva R., Sobin, Lindsay B., Lawlor, Claire M., Basa, Krystyne C., Levi, Jessica R., Tracy, Jeremiah C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: bias; Gender; Otolaryngology; Patient satisfaction; physician demographics; Press Ganey; Quality of care; value‐based healthcare
• ISSN: 0023-852X; 1531-4995
• DOI: 10.1002/lary.28335

Objectives/Hypothesis Patient satisfaction is increasingly emphasized and measured in healthcare delivery. However, patient satisfaction is multifactorial and difficult to comprehensively assess. The objective of this study was to assess for correlation between patient satisfaction measured by Press Ganey surveys (PGS) and physician demographics of gender, years in practice, academic rank, and specialty in academic otolaryngology. Study Design Review of publicly available PGS scores in academic otolaryngology practice. Methods Public websites of academic otolaryngology departments were assessed for inclusion of PGS scores. Individual physician profiles were queried for years in practice, academic rank, and specialty. Gender was determined by picture or profile pronouns. Univariate and multivariate analyses compared PGS scores with studied variables. Results Forty‐seven of 113 (42.8%) academic practices publicly reported physician PGS score. Of 1,360 affiliated otolaryngologists, 742 (54.6%,592 male:150 female) revealed PGS scores. Average PGS score for male and female providers was equivalent (PGS = 4.73, P = .84). There was no significant difference in PGS scores by academic rank (P = .28). A weak statistically significant decrease in mean PGS scores was associated with longer duration of practice (r = −0.11, P = .018). Head and neck oncologic surgeons had higher mean PGS score in comparison to other specialties (PGS = 4.81, P