Loading…
Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research
The objective of this study was to establish thresholds for clinical importance (TCIs) for the five functioning and nine symptom scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). In this diagnostic study, cancer patients w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2020-02, Vol.118, p.1-8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-56351d3490f32f1423fc0119ca76536e90a55392899d9178a08a681e47e631bf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-56351d3490f32f1423fc0119ca76536e90a55392899d9178a08a681e47e631bf3 |
container_end_page | 8 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Giesinger, Johannes M. Loth, Fanny L.C. Aaronson, Neil K. Arraras, Juan I. Caocci, Giovanni Efficace, Fabio Groenvold, Mogens van Leeuwen, Marieke Petersen, Morten Aa Ramage, John Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A. Young, Teresa Holzner, Bernhard |
description | The objective of this study was to establish thresholds for clinical importance (TCIs) for the five functioning and nine symptom scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
In this diagnostic study, cancer patients with mixed diagnoses and treatments completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and anchored the questions in each domain in terms of their clinical importance. The anchor questions, concerned limitations in daily life, need for help/care, and the worries of the patient and his/her partner/family. These questions allowed categorizing patients into whether they exhibited a clinically important symptom/functional impairment for each scale and performing a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to establish TCIs.
Data from 498 patients from six European countries (mean age 60.4 years, 55.2% women) were analyzed. For the TCIs generated using the patient questionnaire data, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales showed sensitivity values between 0.71 and 0.97 and specificity values between 0.62 and 0.92 (area under the curve above 0.80 for all scales).
This EORTC Quality of Life Group study provides TCIs for the functioning and symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. These TCIs can increase the interpretability of the questionnaire results and foster its use in daily clinical practice and in clinical research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2308180429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0895435619307085</els_id><sourcerecordid>2308180429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-56351d3490f32f1423fc0119ca76536e90a55392899d9178a08a681e47e631bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVoSLZp_0IQ9NKLt5L1YenWsqRJYSGkbM9CK4-xjNdyJW1C7_3hldmkhV5yEoyeeWekB6FrStaUUPlpWA9u9BPMfl0TqktxTQg7QyuqGlUJXdM3aEWUFhVnQl6itykNhNCGNOICXTIqmeZcrNDvXR8h9WFsE-5CxEuod3bE_jCHmO3kAD9BBAwp2_3oUw8tzmG5juERsJ8yxDlCttmHCYcO5x7wzf333QY_bB-qDSOF-Rc7R-uyL6F2anGZDDa6_h067-yY4P3zeYV-fL3Zbe6q7f3tt82XbeU457kSkgnaMq5Jx-qO8pp1jlCqnW2kYBI0sUIwXSutW00bZYmyUlHgDUhG9x27Qh9PuWX3n8fyInPwycE42gnCMZmaEUUV4bUu6If_0CEc41S2KxRvWFNrvlDyRLkYUorQmTn6g42_DCVm8WQG8-LJLJ6WevFUGq-f44_7A7R_217EFODzCYDyH48eoknOQ7HR-ggumzb412b8AcxtpnI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2347372949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Giesinger, Johannes M. ; Loth, Fanny L.C. ; Aaronson, Neil K. ; Arraras, Juan I. ; Caocci, Giovanni ; Efficace, Fabio ; Groenvold, Mogens ; van Leeuwen, Marieke ; Petersen, Morten Aa ; Ramage, John ; Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A. ; Young, Teresa ; Holzner, Bernhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Giesinger, Johannes M. ; Loth, Fanny L.C. ; Aaronson, Neil K. ; Arraras, Juan I. ; Caocci, Giovanni ; Efficace, Fabio ; Groenvold, Mogens ; van Leeuwen, Marieke ; Petersen, Morten Aa ; Ramage, John ; Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A. ; Young, Teresa ; Holzner, Bernhard ; EORTC Quality of Life Group</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to establish thresholds for clinical importance (TCIs) for the five functioning and nine symptom scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
In this diagnostic study, cancer patients with mixed diagnoses and treatments completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and anchored the questions in each domain in terms of their clinical importance. The anchor questions, concerned limitations in daily life, need for help/care, and the worries of the patient and his/her partner/family. These questions allowed categorizing patients into whether they exhibited a clinically important symptom/functional impairment for each scale and performing a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to establish TCIs.
Data from 498 patients from six European countries (mean age 60.4 years, 55.2% women) were analyzed. For the TCIs generated using the patient questionnaire data, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales showed sensitivity values between 0.71 and 0.97 and specificity values between 0.62 and 0.92 (area under the curve above 0.80 for all scales).
This EORTC Quality of Life Group study provides TCIs for the functioning and symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. These TCIs can increase the interpretability of the questionnaire results and foster its use in daily clinical practice and in clinical research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31639445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Cancer ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical oncology ; Clinical significance ; Cut-offs ; Diagnostic systems ; EORTC QLQ-C30 ; Epidemiology ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Pain ; Patient-reported outcome measures ; Patients ; Professional ethics ; Professionals ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Questions ; Thresholds</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2020-02, Vol.118, p.1-8</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-56351d3490f32f1423fc0119ca76536e90a55392899d9178a08a681e47e631bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-56351d3490f32f1423fc0119ca76536e90a55392899d9178a08a681e47e631bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31639445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giesinger, Johannes M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loth, Fanny L.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aaronson, Neil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arraras, Juan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caocci, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efficace, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenvold, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Leeuwen, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Morten Aa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramage, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzner, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EORTC Quality of Life Group</creatorcontrib><title>Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to establish thresholds for clinical importance (TCIs) for the five functioning and nine symptom scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
In this diagnostic study, cancer patients with mixed diagnoses and treatments completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and anchored the questions in each domain in terms of their clinical importance. The anchor questions, concerned limitations in daily life, need for help/care, and the worries of the patient and his/her partner/family. These questions allowed categorizing patients into whether they exhibited a clinically important symptom/functional impairment for each scale and performing a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to establish TCIs.
Data from 498 patients from six European countries (mean age 60.4 years, 55.2% women) were analyzed. For the TCIs generated using the patient questionnaire data, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales showed sensitivity values between 0.71 and 0.97 and specificity values between 0.62 and 0.92 (area under the curve above 0.80 for all scales).
This EORTC Quality of Life Group study provides TCIs for the functioning and symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. These TCIs can increase the interpretability of the questionnaire results and foster its use in daily clinical practice and in clinical research.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical oncology</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Cut-offs</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>EORTC QLQ-C30</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient-reported outcome measures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVoSLZp_0IQ9NKLt5L1YenWsqRJYSGkbM9CK4-xjNdyJW1C7_3hldmkhV5yEoyeeWekB6FrStaUUPlpWA9u9BPMfl0TqktxTQg7QyuqGlUJXdM3aEWUFhVnQl6itykNhNCGNOICXTIqmeZcrNDvXR8h9WFsE-5CxEuod3bE_jCHmO3kAD9BBAwp2_3oUw8tzmG5juERsJ8yxDlCttmHCYcO5x7wzf333QY_bB-qDSOF-Rc7R-uyL6F2anGZDDa6_h067-yY4P3zeYV-fL3Zbe6q7f3tt82XbeU457kSkgnaMq5Jx-qO8pp1jlCqnW2kYBI0sUIwXSutW00bZYmyUlHgDUhG9x27Qh9PuWX3n8fyInPwycE42gnCMZmaEUUV4bUu6If_0CEc41S2KxRvWFNrvlDyRLkYUorQmTn6g42_DCVm8WQG8-LJLJ6WevFUGq-f44_7A7R_217EFODzCYDyH48eoknOQ7HR-ggumzb412b8AcxtpnI</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Giesinger, Johannes M.</creator><creator>Loth, Fanny L.C.</creator><creator>Aaronson, Neil K.</creator><creator>Arraras, Juan I.</creator><creator>Caocci, Giovanni</creator><creator>Efficace, Fabio</creator><creator>Groenvold, Mogens</creator><creator>van Leeuwen, Marieke</creator><creator>Petersen, Morten Aa</creator><creator>Ramage, John</creator><creator>Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.</creator><creator>Young, Teresa</creator><creator>Holzner, Bernhard</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research</title><author>Giesinger, Johannes M. ; Loth, Fanny L.C. ; Aaronson, Neil K. ; Arraras, Juan I. ; Caocci, Giovanni ; Efficace, Fabio ; Groenvold, Mogens ; van Leeuwen, Marieke ; Petersen, Morten Aa ; Ramage, John ; Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A. ; Young, Teresa ; Holzner, Bernhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-56351d3490f32f1423fc0119ca76536e90a55392899d9178a08a681e47e631bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical oncology</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Cut-offs</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>EORTC QLQ-C30</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient-reported outcome measures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giesinger, Johannes M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loth, Fanny L.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aaronson, Neil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arraras, Juan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caocci, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efficace, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenvold, Mogens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Leeuwen, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Morten Aa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramage, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzner, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EORTC Quality of Life Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giesinger, Johannes M.</au><au>Loth, Fanny L.C.</au><au>Aaronson, Neil K.</au><au>Arraras, Juan I.</au><au>Caocci, Giovanni</au><au>Efficace, Fabio</au><au>Groenvold, Mogens</au><au>van Leeuwen, Marieke</au><au>Petersen, Morten Aa</au><au>Ramage, John</au><au>Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.</au><au>Young, Teresa</au><au>Holzner, Bernhard</au><aucorp>EORTC Quality of Life Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>118</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to establish thresholds for clinical importance (TCIs) for the five functioning and nine symptom scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
In this diagnostic study, cancer patients with mixed diagnoses and treatments completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and anchored the questions in each domain in terms of their clinical importance. The anchor questions, concerned limitations in daily life, need for help/care, and the worries of the patient and his/her partner/family. These questions allowed categorizing patients into whether they exhibited a clinically important symptom/functional impairment for each scale and performing a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to establish TCIs.
Data from 498 patients from six European countries (mean age 60.4 years, 55.2% women) were analyzed. For the TCIs generated using the patient questionnaire data, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales showed sensitivity values between 0.71 and 0.97 and specificity values between 0.62 and 0.92 (area under the curve above 0.80 for all scales).
This EORTC Quality of Life Group study provides TCIs for the functioning and symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. These TCIs can increase the interpretability of the questionnaire results and foster its use in daily clinical practice and in clinical research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31639445</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-4356 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2020-02, Vol.118, p.1-8 |
issn | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2308180429 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Cancer Clinical medicine Clinical oncology Clinical significance Cut-offs Diagnostic systems EORTC QLQ-C30 Epidemiology Medical personnel Medical research Pain Patient-reported outcome measures Patients Professional ethics Professionals Quality of life Questionnaires Questions Thresholds |
title | Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A03%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thresholds%20for%20clinical%20importance%20were%20established%20to%20improve%20interpretation%20of%20the%20EORTC%20QLQ-C30%20in%20clinical%20practice%20and%20research&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Giesinger,%20Johannes%20M.&rft.aucorp=EORTC%20Quality%20of%20Life%20Group&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=118&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2308180429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-56351d3490f32f1423fc0119ca76536e90a55392899d9178a08a681e47e631bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2347372949&rft_id=info:pmid/31639445&rfr_iscdi=true |