Loading…
Colorimetric study about the stratification’s effect on colour perception of resin composites
To evaluate the influence of a different order of dentin and enamel layers on stratification appearance of different resin composites. 144 Dentin (D) and Enamel (E) composite samples (Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium, Brilliant EverGlow, Estelite Asteria), 1 mm thick, were divided into 12 configuration...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Odontology 2020-07, Vol.108 (3), p.479-485 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b0edd4f28052d3c3c0cdd6b70e248433e0b1895f9ff850f43e7dbc9d8a9d5f83 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b0edd4f28052d3c3c0cdd6b70e248433e0b1895f9ff850f43e7dbc9d8a9d5f83 |
| container_end_page | 485 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 479 |
| container_title | Odontology |
| container_volume | 108 |
| creator | La Rosa, G. R. M. Pasquale, S. Pedullà, E. Palermo, F. Rapisarda, E. Gueli, A. M. |
| description | To evaluate the influence of a different order of dentin and enamel layers on stratification appearance of different resin composites. 144 Dentin (D) and Enamel (E) composite samples (Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium, Brilliant EverGlow, Estelite Asteria), 1 mm thick, were divided into 12 configurations for each composite, with Enamel–Dentin–Dentin–Enamel (EDDE) assumed as target. The colour specification was conducted using a spectrophotometer, elaborating the results with the CIE
L
*
a
*
b
* colour coordinates and calculating the colour difference in terms of
Δ
E
ab
∗
quantity. A value of this last major of 3.3 was considered not clinically acceptable. Moreover, data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (
P
3.3 compared to gold standard EDDE.
Δ
E
ab
∗
was influenced especially by
b
* and
L
* coordinates (
P
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10266-019-00469-9 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310668342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2406964752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b0edd4f28052d3c3c0cdd6b70e248433e0b1895f9ff850f43e7dbc9d8a9d5f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOHDEUhq0oKLtAXiBFZCkNzYTjy3jGJVolgLQSDb01Yx-TQbvjwfYU2-U1eD2eJF4WiERB44v-y7E_Qr4x-MkAmvPEgCtVAdMVgFS60p_IkinWVozX9ee3s2wW5DilewDeSAFfyEIwpaQSYknMKmxCHLaY42BpyrPb0a4Pc6b5D5Z77PLgB1vWMD79fUwUvUebaRipLck50gmjxWmv0-BpxDTspe0U0pAxnZIj320Sfn3ZT8jt71-3q6tqfXN5vbpYV1Zonase0DnpeQs1d8IKC9Y51TeAXLZSCISetbr22vu2Bi8FNq632rWddrVvxQk5O9ROMTzMmLLZDsniZtONGOZkuGCgVCskL9Yf76z35RtjeZzhEpRWsqn3Ln5w2RhSiujNVCh1cWcYmD19c6BvCn3zTN_oEvr-Uj33W3RvkVfcxSAOhlSk8Q7j_9kf1P4D9KaSPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406964752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colorimetric study about the stratification’s effect on colour perception of resin composites</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>La Rosa, G. R. M. ; Pasquale, S. ; Pedullà, E. ; Palermo, F. ; Rapisarda, E. ; Gueli, A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>La Rosa, G. R. M. ; Pasquale, S. ; Pedullà, E. ; Palermo, F. ; Rapisarda, E. ; Gueli, A. M.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[To evaluate the influence of a different order of dentin and enamel layers on stratification appearance of different resin composites. 144 Dentin (D) and Enamel (E) composite samples (Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium, Brilliant EverGlow, Estelite Asteria), 1 mm thick, were divided into 12 configurations for each composite, with Enamel–Dentin–Dentin–Enamel (EDDE) assumed as target. The colour specification was conducted using a spectrophotometer, elaborating the results with the CIE
L
*
a
*
b
* colour coordinates and calculating the colour difference in terms of
Δ
E
ab
∗
quantity. A value of this last major of 3.3 was considered not clinically acceptable. Moreover, data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (
P
< 0.05). For Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium and Brilliant EverGlow, six configurations showed
Δ
E
ab
∗
> 3.3 compared to gold standard EDDE.
Δ
E
ab
∗
was influenced especially by
b
* and
L
* coordinates (
P
< 0.05). EDED showed no visual difference (0 <
Δ
E
ab
∗
< 1.1) for both composites. For Estelite Asteria, two configurations reported
Δ
E
ab
∗
> 3.3 compared to EDDE. In particular, the
L
* coordinate influenced
Δ
E
ab
∗
results (
P
< 0.05). EDDD was the best configuration (0 <
Δ
E
ab
∗
< 1.1). Within the limits of a vitro study, Brilliant EG showed more dependence from order and thickness of stratification (resulting more similar to Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium); therefore, it could be indicated for more complex aesthetic restorations. Estelite Asteria seems to be able to balance small differences in thickness of dentin and enamel layers, and consequently, it is more indicated to different clinical situations.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-1247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1255</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10266-019-00469-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31664633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Color ; Color Perception ; Colorimetry ; Composite materials ; Composite Resins ; Dental Enamel ; Dentin ; Dentistry ; Enamel ; Materials Testing ; Medicine ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original Article ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Odontology, 2020-07, Vol.108 (3), p.479-485</ispartof><rights>The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2019</rights><rights>The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b0edd4f28052d3c3c0cdd6b70e248433e0b1895f9ff850f43e7dbc9d8a9d5f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b0edd4f28052d3c3c0cdd6b70e248433e0b1895f9ff850f43e7dbc9d8a9d5f83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5127-5299</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>La Rosa, G. R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquale, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedullà, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapisarda, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueli, A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Colorimetric study about the stratification’s effect on colour perception of resin composites</title><title>Odontology</title><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><description><![CDATA[To evaluate the influence of a different order of dentin and enamel layers on stratification appearance of different resin composites. 144 Dentin (D) and Enamel (E) composite samples (Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium, Brilliant EverGlow, Estelite Asteria), 1 mm thick, were divided into 12 configurations for each composite, with Enamel–Dentin–Dentin–Enamel (EDDE) assumed as target. The colour specification was conducted using a spectrophotometer, elaborating the results with the CIE
L
*
a
*
b
* colour coordinates and calculating the colour difference in terms of
Δ
E
ab
∗
quantity. A value of this last major of 3.3 was considered not clinically acceptable. Moreover, data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (
P
< 0.05). For Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium and Brilliant EverGlow, six configurations showed
Δ
E
ab
∗
> 3.3 compared to gold standard EDDE.
Δ
E
ab
∗
was influenced especially by
b
* and
L
* coordinates (
P
< 0.05). EDED showed no visual difference (0 <
Δ
E
ab
∗
< 1.1) for both composites. For Estelite Asteria, two configurations reported
Δ
E
ab
∗
> 3.3 compared to EDDE. In particular, the
L
* coordinate influenced
Δ
E
ab
∗
results (
P
< 0.05). EDDD was the best configuration (0 <
Δ
E
ab
∗
< 1.1). Within the limits of a vitro study, Brilliant EG showed more dependence from order and thickness of stratification (resulting more similar to Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium); therefore, it could be indicated for more complex aesthetic restorations. Estelite Asteria seems to be able to balance small differences in thickness of dentin and enamel layers, and consequently, it is more indicated to different clinical situations.]]></description><subject>Color</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Colorimetry</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental Enamel</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>1618-1247</issn><issn>1618-1255</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLtOHDEUhq0oKLtAXiBFZCkNzYTjy3jGJVolgLQSDb01Yx-TQbvjwfYU2-U1eD2eJF4WiERB44v-y7E_Qr4x-MkAmvPEgCtVAdMVgFS60p_IkinWVozX9ee3s2wW5DilewDeSAFfyEIwpaQSYknMKmxCHLaY42BpyrPb0a4Pc6b5D5Z77PLgB1vWMD79fUwUvUebaRipLck50gmjxWmv0-BpxDTspe0U0pAxnZIj320Sfn3ZT8jt71-3q6tqfXN5vbpYV1Zonase0DnpeQs1d8IKC9Y51TeAXLZSCISetbr22vu2Bi8FNq632rWddrVvxQk5O9ROMTzMmLLZDsniZtONGOZkuGCgVCskL9Yf76z35RtjeZzhEpRWsqn3Ln5w2RhSiujNVCh1cWcYmD19c6BvCn3zTN_oEvr-Uj33W3RvkVfcxSAOhlSk8Q7j_9kf1P4D9KaSPw</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>La Rosa, G. R. M.</creator><creator>Pasquale, S.</creator><creator>Pedullà, E.</creator><creator>Palermo, F.</creator><creator>Rapisarda, E.</creator><creator>Gueli, A. M.</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5127-5299</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Colorimetric study about the stratification’s effect on colour perception of resin composites</title><author>La Rosa, G. R. M. ; Pasquale, S. ; Pedullà, E. ; Palermo, F. ; Rapisarda, E. ; Gueli, A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b0edd4f28052d3c3c0cdd6b70e248433e0b1895f9ff850f43e7dbc9d8a9d5f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Color</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Colorimetry</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental Enamel</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>La Rosa, G. R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquale, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedullà, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapisarda, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueli, A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Odontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>La Rosa, G. R. M.</au><au>Pasquale, S.</au><au>Pedullà, E.</au><au>Palermo, F.</au><au>Rapisarda, E.</au><au>Gueli, A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colorimetric study about the stratification’s effect on colour perception of resin composites</atitle><jtitle>Odontology</jtitle><stitle>Odontology</stitle><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>479-485</pages><issn>1618-1247</issn><eissn>1618-1255</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[To evaluate the influence of a different order of dentin and enamel layers on stratification appearance of different resin composites. 144 Dentin (D) and Enamel (E) composite samples (Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium, Brilliant EverGlow, Estelite Asteria), 1 mm thick, were divided into 12 configurations for each composite, with Enamel–Dentin–Dentin–Enamel (EDDE) assumed as target. The colour specification was conducted using a spectrophotometer, elaborating the results with the CIE
L
*
a
*
b
* colour coordinates and calculating the colour difference in terms of
Δ
E
ab
∗
quantity. A value of this last major of 3.3 was considered not clinically acceptable. Moreover, data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (
P
< 0.05). For Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium and Brilliant EverGlow, six configurations showed
Δ
E
ab
∗
> 3.3 compared to gold standard EDDE.
Δ
E
ab
∗
was influenced especially by
b
* and
L
* coordinates (
P
< 0.05). EDED showed no visual difference (0 <
Δ
E
ab
∗
< 1.1) for both composites. For Estelite Asteria, two configurations reported
Δ
E
ab
∗
> 3.3 compared to EDDE. In particular, the
L
* coordinate influenced
Δ
E
ab
∗
results (
P
< 0.05). EDDD was the best configuration (0 <
Δ
E
ab
∗
< 1.1). Within the limits of a vitro study, Brilliant EG showed more dependence from order and thickness of stratification (resulting more similar to Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Premium); therefore, it could be indicated for more complex aesthetic restorations. Estelite Asteria seems to be able to balance small differences in thickness of dentin and enamel layers, and consequently, it is more indicated to different clinical situations.]]></abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><pmid>31664633</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10266-019-00469-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5127-5299</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1618-1247 |
| ispartof | Odontology, 2020-07, Vol.108 (3), p.479-485 |
| issn | 1618-1247 1618-1255 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310668342 |
| source | Springer Nature |
| subjects | Color Color Perception Colorimetry Composite materials Composite Resins Dental Enamel Dentin Dentistry Enamel Materials Testing Medicine Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Original Article Surface Properties |
| title | Colorimetric study about the stratification’s effect on colour perception of resin composites |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A26%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colorimetric%20study%20about%20the%20stratification%E2%80%99s%20effect%20on%20colour%20perception%20of%20resin%20composites&rft.jtitle=Odontology&rft.au=La%20Rosa,%20G.%20R.%20M.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=479-485&rft.issn=1618-1247&rft.eissn=1618-1255&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10266-019-00469-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2406964752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b0edd4f28052d3c3c0cdd6b70e248433e0b1895f9ff850f43e7dbc9d8a9d5f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406964752&rft_id=info:pmid/31664633&rfr_iscdi=true |