Population structure of Borrelia turcica from Greece and Turkey

• Published in: Infection, genetics and evolution genetics and evolution, 2020-01, Vol.77, p.104050-104050, Article 104050
• Main Authors: Hepner, Sabrina, Fingerle, Volker, Duscher, Georg Gerhard, Felsberger, Gerit, Marosevic, Durdica, Rollins, Robert Ethan, Okeyo, Mercy, Sing, Andreas, Margos, Gabriele
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Borrelia turcica; Hyalomma aegyptium; Multilocus sequence typing; Next generation sequencing; Population structure; Testudo
• ISSN: 1567-1348; 1567-7257
• DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.104050

Borrelia turcica, a member of the reptile-associated Borrelia clade, is vectored by Hyalomma aegyptium. The only suggested reservoir hosts of B. turcica are tortoises of the genus Testudo. Borrelia turcica has been described to occur in several Southeastern European countries including Turkey, Romania, Bulgaria and Greece but so far nothing is known about the relationship of these populations and whether or how they are structured. Using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) on eight chromosomally located housekeeping loci (clpA, clpX, nifS, pepX, pyrG, recG, rplB and uvrA) we analyzed 43 B. turcica isolates from Serres, Greece (n = 15) collected in 2017 and Izmir, Turkey (n = 28) collected in 2018. To understand their relationship a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree and goeBURST analysis were done based on MLST sequence data and allelic profiles, respectively. The data we generated confirmed that the samples of B. turcica investigated here were divergent from Lyme disease (LD) and relapsing fever (RF) species. Within the B. turcica clade, samples of different geographic origin (Greece, Turkey) clustered together in terminal branches; no obvious differences between the Greek and Turkish samples were noticeable. A goeBURST analysis using triple-locus variants revealed very few clonal complexes with the majority of samples appearing as singletons. Minor clonal complexes (consisting of two sequence types) comprised only Greek isolates, only Turkish isolates or both, so no pattern of clustering of isolates from the two geographical regions was observed. Interestingly, very little population structure was discerned in our study. This was surprising in view of the large geographic distance between collection sites of B. turcica and raises questions about the evolution or spatial spread of this species. •First study presenting population data of B. turcica from Greece and Turkey•Very little population structure was found.•No phylogenetic clustering according to sample origin or isolation time was observed.