Loading…

Energetic, economic and environmental assessment for the anaerobic digestion of pretreated and codigested press mud

•The payback period for press mud and vinasse co-digestion was of 4.0 years.•LHW and TA pre-treatments of press mud were thermally self-sufficient.•The environmental profile of the press mud was improved after anaerobic digestion.•Thermal and electric demand of alcohol production was covered by biog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2020-02, Vol.102, p.249-259
Main Authors: López González, Lisbet Mailin, Pereda Reyes, Ileana, Pedraza Garciga, Julio, Barrera, Ernesto L., Romero Romero, Osvaldo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-984636824bfd61d8ca8b076871ad6c5d0e1455e673ce32796f53d325b344b30b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-984636824bfd61d8ca8b076871ad6c5d0e1455e673ce32796f53d325b344b30b3
container_end_page 259
container_issue
container_start_page 249
container_title Waste management (Elmsford)
container_volume 102
creator López González, Lisbet Mailin
Pereda Reyes, Ileana
Pedraza Garciga, Julio
Barrera, Ernesto L.
Romero Romero, Osvaldo
description •The payback period for press mud and vinasse co-digestion was of 4.0 years.•LHW and TA pre-treatments of press mud were thermally self-sufficient.•The environmental profile of the press mud was improved after anaerobic digestion.•Thermal and electric demand of alcohol production was covered by biogas plant. This study investigates the feasibility of anaerobic digestion (AD) of press mud previously pretreated, using two methods: Liquid Hot Water (LHW) and Thermo-Alkaline (TA), from an economic, energetic and environmental point of view. Two scenarios, a sugar mill with and without distillery were studied, considering monodigestion and vinasse codigestion. The results have shown that the LHW and TA pretreatments are self-sufficient in terms of thermal requirements since they can recover heat from the biogas engine, but the maximum electric and thermal net energy (64 MWh d−1 and 95 MWh d−1, respectively) was obtained during co-digestion with vinasse. The results of the environmental Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) show that the alternatives improve the environmental profiles, in both scenarios. The endpoint impact category “Human health” had the highest contribution because of both: the burning of fossil fuel at refinery to supply the required electricity; and the production of Ca(OH)2 when vinasse was fed. The AD of pretreated press mud by LHW in CSTR reactors was the most viable for the scenario of a sugar mill without distillery, while the alternative co-digestion with the vinasse of the press mud without pretreatment was the most viable for the scenario of a sugar mill with distillery. This research shows that both the environmental and energetic profiles and the profitability of methane production can improve when the pretreatment and co-digestion of these wastes from the sugar – alcohol production process are considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.053
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2312808482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X19306890</els_id><sourcerecordid>2312808482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-984636824bfd61d8ca8b076871ad6c5d0e1455e673ce32796f53d325b344b30b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJaLZp_0EJOuZQb_RlWb4UQkg_INBLCr0JWRqnWtbSRuPdkH9fbZ3m2NMw7zzz9RLykbM1Z1xfbdZPDieX1oLxvkpr1so3ZMVN1zdCtfqErFjf6qbKv87IO8QNY1wZzt6SM8l1L3vdrwjeJigPMEf_iYLPKU_RU5cChXSIJacJ0uy21CEC4jGhYy50_g0VclDyUPEQHwDnmBPNI90VmAu4GcLfMT4v1ZrWCiKd9uE9OR3dFuHDSzwnP7_c3t98a-5-fP1-c33XeKnF3PRGaamNUMMYNA_GOzOwTpuOu6B9Gxhw1bagO-lBiq7XYyuDFO0glRokG-Q5uVzm7kp-3Ncj7BTRw3brEuQ9WiG5MMwoIyqqFtSXjFhgtLsSJ1eeLWf2aLfd2MVue7T7qFZfa9vFy4b9MEF4bfrnbwU-LwDUPw8RikUfIXkIsYCfbcjx_xv-AFwLlIE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2312808482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energetic, economic and environmental assessment for the anaerobic digestion of pretreated and codigested press mud</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>López González, Lisbet Mailin ; Pereda Reyes, Ileana ; Pedraza Garciga, Julio ; Barrera, Ernesto L. ; Romero Romero, Osvaldo</creator><creatorcontrib>López González, Lisbet Mailin ; Pereda Reyes, Ileana ; Pedraza Garciga, Julio ; Barrera, Ernesto L. ; Romero Romero, Osvaldo</creatorcontrib><description>•The payback period for press mud and vinasse co-digestion was of 4.0 years.•LHW and TA pre-treatments of press mud were thermally self-sufficient.•The environmental profile of the press mud was improved after anaerobic digestion.•Thermal and electric demand of alcohol production was covered by biogas plant. This study investigates the feasibility of anaerobic digestion (AD) of press mud previously pretreated, using two methods: Liquid Hot Water (LHW) and Thermo-Alkaline (TA), from an economic, energetic and environmental point of view. Two scenarios, a sugar mill with and without distillery were studied, considering monodigestion and vinasse codigestion. The results have shown that the LHW and TA pretreatments are self-sufficient in terms of thermal requirements since they can recover heat from the biogas engine, but the maximum electric and thermal net energy (64 MWh d−1 and 95 MWh d−1, respectively) was obtained during co-digestion with vinasse. The results of the environmental Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) show that the alternatives improve the environmental profiles, in both scenarios. The endpoint impact category “Human health” had the highest contribution because of both: the burning of fossil fuel at refinery to supply the required electricity; and the production of Ca(OH)2 when vinasse was fed. The AD of pretreated press mud by LHW in CSTR reactors was the most viable for the scenario of a sugar mill without distillery, while the alternative co-digestion with the vinasse of the press mud without pretreatment was the most viable for the scenario of a sugar mill with distillery. This research shows that both the environmental and energetic profiles and the profitability of methane production can improve when the pretreatment and co-digestion of these wastes from the sugar – alcohol production process are considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31693969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobiosis ; Biofuels ; Electricity ; Energy integration ; Environmental impact ; Hot Temperature ; Methane ; Press mud and vinasse ; Techno-economic analysis</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2020-02, Vol.102, p.249-259</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-984636824bfd61d8ca8b076871ad6c5d0e1455e673ce32796f53d325b344b30b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-984636824bfd61d8ca8b076871ad6c5d0e1455e673ce32796f53d325b344b30b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6517-4202</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31693969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>López González, Lisbet Mailin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereda Reyes, Ileana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedraza Garciga, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrera, Ernesto L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero Romero, Osvaldo</creatorcontrib><title>Energetic, economic and environmental assessment for the anaerobic digestion of pretreated and codigested press mud</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>•The payback period for press mud and vinasse co-digestion was of 4.0 years.•LHW and TA pre-treatments of press mud were thermally self-sufficient.•The environmental profile of the press mud was improved after anaerobic digestion.•Thermal and electric demand of alcohol production was covered by biogas plant. This study investigates the feasibility of anaerobic digestion (AD) of press mud previously pretreated, using two methods: Liquid Hot Water (LHW) and Thermo-Alkaline (TA), from an economic, energetic and environmental point of view. Two scenarios, a sugar mill with and without distillery were studied, considering monodigestion and vinasse codigestion. The results have shown that the LHW and TA pretreatments are self-sufficient in terms of thermal requirements since they can recover heat from the biogas engine, but the maximum electric and thermal net energy (64 MWh d−1 and 95 MWh d−1, respectively) was obtained during co-digestion with vinasse. The results of the environmental Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) show that the alternatives improve the environmental profiles, in both scenarios. The endpoint impact category “Human health” had the highest contribution because of both: the burning of fossil fuel at refinery to supply the required electricity; and the production of Ca(OH)2 when vinasse was fed. The AD of pretreated press mud by LHW in CSTR reactors was the most viable for the scenario of a sugar mill without distillery, while the alternative co-digestion with the vinasse of the press mud without pretreatment was the most viable for the scenario of a sugar mill with distillery. This research shows that both the environmental and energetic profiles and the profitability of methane production can improve when the pretreatment and co-digestion of these wastes from the sugar – alcohol production process are considered.</description><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy integration</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Press mud and vinasse</subject><subject>Techno-economic analysis</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJaLZp_0EJOuZQb_RlWb4UQkg_INBLCr0JWRqnWtbSRuPdkH9fbZ3m2NMw7zzz9RLykbM1Z1xfbdZPDieX1oLxvkpr1so3ZMVN1zdCtfqErFjf6qbKv87IO8QNY1wZzt6SM8l1L3vdrwjeJigPMEf_iYLPKU_RU5cChXSIJacJ0uy21CEC4jGhYy50_g0VclDyUPEQHwDnmBPNI90VmAu4GcLfMT4v1ZrWCiKd9uE9OR3dFuHDSzwnP7_c3t98a-5-fP1-c33XeKnF3PRGaamNUMMYNA_GOzOwTpuOu6B9Gxhw1bagO-lBiq7XYyuDFO0glRokG-Q5uVzm7kp-3Ncj7BTRw3brEuQ9WiG5MMwoIyqqFtSXjFhgtLsSJ1eeLWf2aLfd2MVue7T7qFZfa9vFy4b9MEF4bfrnbwU-LwDUPw8RikUfIXkIsYCfbcjx_xv-AFwLlIE</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>López González, Lisbet Mailin</creator><creator>Pereda Reyes, Ileana</creator><creator>Pedraza Garciga, Julio</creator><creator>Barrera, Ernesto L.</creator><creator>Romero Romero, Osvaldo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-4202</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Energetic, economic and environmental assessment for the anaerobic digestion of pretreated and codigested press mud</title><author>López González, Lisbet Mailin ; Pereda Reyes, Ileana ; Pedraza Garciga, Julio ; Barrera, Ernesto L. ; Romero Romero, Osvaldo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-984636824bfd61d8ca8b076871ad6c5d0e1455e673ce32796f53d325b344b30b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy integration</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Press mud and vinasse</topic><topic>Techno-economic analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López González, Lisbet Mailin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereda Reyes, Ileana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedraza Garciga, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrera, Ernesto L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero Romero, Osvaldo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López González, Lisbet Mailin</au><au>Pereda Reyes, Ileana</au><au>Pedraza Garciga, Julio</au><au>Barrera, Ernesto L.</au><au>Romero Romero, Osvaldo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energetic, economic and environmental assessment for the anaerobic digestion of pretreated and codigested press mud</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>102</volume><spage>249</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>249-259</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>•The payback period for press mud and vinasse co-digestion was of 4.0 years.•LHW and TA pre-treatments of press mud were thermally self-sufficient.•The environmental profile of the press mud was improved after anaerobic digestion.•Thermal and electric demand of alcohol production was covered by biogas plant. This study investigates the feasibility of anaerobic digestion (AD) of press mud previously pretreated, using two methods: Liquid Hot Water (LHW) and Thermo-Alkaline (TA), from an economic, energetic and environmental point of view. Two scenarios, a sugar mill with and without distillery were studied, considering monodigestion and vinasse codigestion. The results have shown that the LHW and TA pretreatments are self-sufficient in terms of thermal requirements since they can recover heat from the biogas engine, but the maximum electric and thermal net energy (64 MWh d−1 and 95 MWh d−1, respectively) was obtained during co-digestion with vinasse. The results of the environmental Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) show that the alternatives improve the environmental profiles, in both scenarios. The endpoint impact category “Human health” had the highest contribution because of both: the burning of fossil fuel at refinery to supply the required electricity; and the production of Ca(OH)2 when vinasse was fed. The AD of pretreated press mud by LHW in CSTR reactors was the most viable for the scenario of a sugar mill without distillery, while the alternative co-digestion with the vinasse of the press mud without pretreatment was the most viable for the scenario of a sugar mill with distillery. This research shows that both the environmental and energetic profiles and the profitability of methane production can improve when the pretreatment and co-digestion of these wastes from the sugar – alcohol production process are considered.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31693969</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.053</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-4202</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-053X
ispartof Waste management (Elmsford), 2020-02, Vol.102, p.249-259
issn 0956-053X
1879-2456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2312808482
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anaerobiosis
Biofuels
Electricity
Energy integration
Environmental impact
Hot Temperature
Methane
Press mud and vinasse
Techno-economic analysis
title Energetic, economic and environmental assessment for the anaerobic digestion of pretreated and codigested press mud
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A19%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energetic,%20economic%20and%20environmental%20assessment%20for%20the%20anaerobic%20digestion%20of%20pretreated%20and%20codigested%20press%20mud&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez%20Gonz%C3%A1lez,%20Lisbet%20Mailin&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=102&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=249-259&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2312808482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-984636824bfd61d8ca8b076871ad6c5d0e1455e673ce32796f53d325b344b30b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2312808482&rft_id=info:pmid/31693969&rfr_iscdi=true