Loading…
Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey
The use of ceramic materials has increased significantly because of high esthetic demands, low costs, and ease of fabrication. Long-term, clinically based evidence is scarce, and laboratory studies have limited relevance in determining clinical durability. The purpose of this dental laboratory surve...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2020-06, Vol.123 (6), p.807-810 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The use of ceramic materials has increased significantly because of high esthetic demands, low costs, and ease of fabrication. Long-term, clinically based evidence is scarce, and laboratory studies have limited relevance in determining clinical durability.
The purpose of this dental laboratory survey was to evaluate the fracture rate of layered and monolithic lithium disilicate and zirconia single crowns and fixed partial dentures after up to 7.5 years of clinical service.
Two commercial dental laboratories with a database system that was able to track the number of remakes because of fracture only were identified. Lithium disilicate restorations (monolithic and layered) were categorized according to restoration type (single crown, fixed partial denture, veneer, and onlay). Zirconia restorations (monolithic and layered) were categorized according to type (single crown, fixed partial denture) and then into anterior or posterior restoration. Restoration remakes due to poor fit, shade, or marginal integrity were excluded from the evaluation. Data were analyzed, and statistical significance was evaluated with chi-square tests (α=.05).
A total of 188 695 (51 751 lithium disilicate and 136 944 zirconia) restorations were included in the analysis, with an overall fracture rate of 1.35%. Lithium disilicate monolithic single crowns had a fracture rate of 0.96%, which was significantly lower than that of layered single crowns at 1.26% (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3913 1097-6841 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.011 |