Loading…

Comparison of estimation of cardiac output using an uncalibrated pulse contour method and echocardiography during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Introduction: During veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiac output monitoring is essential to assess tissue oxygen delivery. Adequate arterial oxygenation depends on the ratio between the extracorporeal pump blood flow and the cardiac output. The aim of this study was to compare es...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perfusion 2020-07, Vol.35 (5), p.397-401
Main Authors: Bond, Ottavia, Pozzebon, Selene, Franchi, Federico, Zama Cavicchi, Federica, Creteur, Jacques, Vincent, Jean-Louis, Taccone, Fabio Silvio, Scolletta, Sabino
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: During veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiac output monitoring is essential to assess tissue oxygen delivery. Adequate arterial oxygenation depends on the ratio between the extracorporeal pump blood flow and the cardiac output. The aim of this study was to compare estimates of cardiac output and blood flow/cardiac output ratios made using an uncalibrated pulse contour method with those made using echocardiography in patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Methods: Cardiac output was estimated simultaneously using a pulse contour method (MostCareUp; Vygon, Encouen, France) and echocardiography in 17 hemodynamically stable patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Comparisons were made using Bland–Altman and linear regression analysis. Results: There were significant correlations between cardiac output estimated using pulse contour method and echocardiography and between blood flow/cardiac output estimated using pulse contour method and blood flow/cardiac output estimated using echocardiography (r = 0.84, p 
ISSN:0267-6591
1477-111X
DOI:10.1177/0267659119883204