Loading…
Inter‐user and intra‐user variation of two tonometers in horses
Background It is currently unknown which of the two devices most commonly used in equine ophthalmology for intraocular pressure (IOP) estimation demonstrates the lowest inter‐user and intra‐user variation. Objectives To assess the inter‐user and intra‐user variation of two tonometers in sedated and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Equine veterinary journal 2020-07, Vol.52 (4), p.572-576 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
It is currently unknown which of the two devices most commonly used in equine ophthalmology for intraocular pressure (IOP) estimation demonstrates the lowest inter‐user and intra‐user variation.
Objectives
To assess the inter‐user and intra‐user variation of two tonometers in sedated and unsedated horses.
Study design
Randomised masked cross‐over trial.
Methods
Four examiners used the rebound (ICare® TonoVet) and applanation (TonoPen®) tonometers to measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) in triplicate in 10 normal horses before and after sedation with xylazine. For inter‐user variation, coefficient of variation (CV) values were calculated from the mean of each examiner for each condition combination. For intra‐user variation, CV values were calculated from the individual measurements of each examiner for each condition combination. CV values were also assessed in relation to other variables using ANOVA.
Results
The rebound tonometer was found to have lower inter‐user (15.4% vs 21.7%, P = .01) and intra‐user (9.1% vs 16.1%, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0425-1644 2042-3306 |
DOI: | 10.1111/evj.13208 |