Flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization in periodontal patients: A retrospective consecutive case‐series study of single‐tooth sites with dehiscence‐type osseous defects

• Published in: Clinical oral implants research 2020-03, Vol.31 (3), p.229-238
• Main Authors: Sicilia‐Felechosa, Alberto, Pereira‐Fernández, Adolfo, García‐Lareu, Javier, Bernardo‐González, Julio, Sicilia‐Blanco, Pelayo, Cuesta‐Fernández, Isabel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aesthetics; Alveoli; Animals; Augmentation; Bone grafts; Bone implants; Bone loss; buccal plate; Cattle; Connective tissues; Defects; Dehiscence; Dental Implants; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth; Dental prosthetics; Dentistry; Esthetics, Dental; Evaluation; Grafts; Humans; Immediate Dental Implant Loading; immediate implants; immediate loading; Maxilla; Patients; Placement; Recession; regeneration; Restoration; Retrospective Studies; soft‐tissue recession; Substitute bone; Success; Teeth; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0905-7161; 1600-0501
• DOI: 10.1111/clr.13559

Objective To assess the clinical outcomes of flapless, immediate implant placement with simultaneous augmentation of dehiscence defects and immediate provisional restoration. Materials and Methods Retrospective evaluation of 40 periodontal patients who received a flapless immediate implant for single‐tooth replacement with simultaneous augmentation of dehiscence defects and immediate provisional restoration, at follow‐up periods ranging from 1 year minimum to 7 years maximum. Dehiscence defects were augmented using autogenous bone grafts and/or deproteinized bovine bone mineral, and autogenous or allogeneic connective tissue grafts. The following aspects were evaluated: clinical success (Clinical Oral Implants Research, 8, 1997, 161), crestal bone loss (calibrated digital periapical X‐rays) and aesthetics (Pink Esthetic Score, PES). Additionally, a questionnaire was devised to obtain patient's subjective evaluation. Results A 98.3% (95% CI: 91%–99%) success rate was observed. At 8 weeks, mean bone loss was 0.47 mm (n = 39); between 8 weeks and 1 year, this va lue attained 0.24 mm and between years 1 and 5 years 0.06 mm (n = 9). The evaluated PES in 37 single‐tooth implants was 12.4, with PES = 7 (aesthetic failures) in two cases, and aesthetic outcomes were excellent (PES ≥ 12) in 29 cases (78.4%). When compared with the contralateral tooth, a recession under 1 mm was observed in 78% of cases. The patient's subjective satisfaction value ranged from 98% to 100%. Conclusion This type of minimally invasive treatment of alveoli with buccal plate deficiencies delivers, in the hands of an experienced clinician, a high clinical and aesthetic success percentage being rated by patients as satisfactory. Clinicians should be aware that 1–2 mm comparative recession could be observed.