Loading…
Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Objective Piezosurgery, used in different otolaryngology procedures, was a breakthrough in surgery. We systematically reviewed the differences in outcomes after lateral nasal osteotomy with peizosurgery and conventional osteotome and quantified the differences through a meta‐analysis. Methods Medlin...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Laryngoscope 2020-05, Vol.130 (5), p.1158-1165 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-3ca50fc7e2f0644fd837cff3290785e89046a5142e2ea5c25fdbf55861b945fc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-3ca50fc7e2f0644fd837cff3290785e89046a5142e2ea5c25fdbf55861b945fc3 |
container_end_page | 1165 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1158 |
container_title | The Laryngoscope |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Mirza, Ahmad A. Alandejani, Talal A. Al‐Sayed, Ahmed A. |
description | Objective
Piezosurgery, used in different otolaryngology procedures, was a breakthrough in surgery. We systematically reviewed the differences in outcomes after lateral nasal osteotomy with peizosurgery and conventional osteotome and quantified the differences through a meta‐analysis.
Methods
Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were selected to search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published before January 2019 that detailed differences between piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy. The key search terms included “rhinoplasty" and “piezosurgery.” Only RCTs in English with patients >18 years who underwent lateral osteotomy by percutaneous or internal approaches were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed in data extraction and study inclusion. Two independent reviewers assessed the relevance of the studies. The point of estimate in the meta‐analysis was the standardized mean difference and was pooled with the random‐effects model. The measured outcomes were ecchymosis, edema, postoperative pain, and duration of surgery.
Results
Five RCTs met our criteria and were analyzed in primary subsequent meta‐analyses. Piezosurgery demonstrated significantly lower edema (SMD = ‐0.75; 95% CI, ‐1.26, ‐0.24) and ecchymosis scores (SMD = ‐0.85; 95% CI, ‐1.49, ‐0.20) on postoperative days (POD) 2 or 3 than conventional surgery. They were also significantly lower with piezosurgery than conventional surgery on POD 7 (SMD = ‐0.64; 95% CI, ‐1.21, ‐0.06; and SMD = ‐0.64; 95% CI, ‐1.14, ‐0.14, respectively). Two studies that estimated the degree of pain showed that after piezosurgery, patients experienced lesser pain than after conventional surgery. The mean difference was ‐0.73 (95% CI, ‐1.06, ‐0.39).
Conclusions
Piezosurgery causes less ecchymosis, edema, and pain than conventional osteotomy, without extending the duration of surgery.
Laryngoscope, 130:1158–1165, 2020 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lary.28408 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317604449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2317604449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-3ca50fc7e2f0644fd837cff3290785e89046a5142e2ea5c25fdbf55861b945fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtqGzEUhkVJqB23mz5AEGQTAuPq6tF0Z0xuYEgoLbSrQZaPGoWZkSPN2ExWeYQ-Y58kcux0kUVWZ_F_5-ecD6EvlIwpIexrpUM_ZkoQ9QENqeQ0E0UhD9AwhTxTkv0aoKMY7wmhOZfkIxpwmksl83yIFrcOHn3swh8IPV5DiF3ExjdraFrnG11hH1vwra977Boc7lzjV5WObf8NT3HsU1jr1hkcYO1gg3WzxDW0-t_TX522--jiJ3RodRXh836O0M-L8x-zq2x-c3k9m84zw2WuMm60JNbkwCyZCGGXiufGWs4KkisJqiBioiUVDBhoaZi0y4WVUk3oohDSGj5Cp7veVfAPHcS2rF00UFW6Ad_FkqWvJ0QIUST05A1677uQ7t1ShaBMUE4TdbajTPAxBrDlKrg6yS4pKbfmy6358sV8go_3ld2ihuV_9FV1AugO2LgK-neqyvn0--9d6TNjQJDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2394124131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Mirza, Ahmad A. ; Alandejani, Talal A. ; Al‐Sayed, Ahmed A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirza, Ahmad A. ; Alandejani, Talal A. ; Al‐Sayed, Ahmed A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Piezosurgery, used in different otolaryngology procedures, was a breakthrough in surgery. We systematically reviewed the differences in outcomes after lateral nasal osteotomy with peizosurgery and conventional osteotome and quantified the differences through a meta‐analysis.
Methods
Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were selected to search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published before January 2019 that detailed differences between piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy. The key search terms included “rhinoplasty" and “piezosurgery.” Only RCTs in English with patients >18 years who underwent lateral osteotomy by percutaneous or internal approaches were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed in data extraction and study inclusion. Two independent reviewers assessed the relevance of the studies. The point of estimate in the meta‐analysis was the standardized mean difference and was pooled with the random‐effects model. The measured outcomes were ecchymosis, edema, postoperative pain, and duration of surgery.
Results
Five RCTs met our criteria and were analyzed in primary subsequent meta‐analyses. Piezosurgery demonstrated significantly lower edema (SMD = ‐0.75; 95% CI, ‐1.26, ‐0.24) and ecchymosis scores (SMD = ‐0.85; 95% CI, ‐1.49, ‐0.20) on postoperative days (POD) 2 or 3 than conventional surgery. They were also significantly lower with piezosurgery than conventional surgery on POD 7 (SMD = ‐0.64; 95% CI, ‐1.21, ‐0.06; and SMD = ‐0.64; 95% CI, ‐1.14, ‐0.14, respectively). Two studies that estimated the degree of pain showed that after piezosurgery, patients experienced lesser pain than after conventional surgery. The mean difference was ‐0.73 (95% CI, ‐1.06, ‐0.39).
Conclusions
Piezosurgery causes less ecchymosis, edema, and pain than conventional osteotomy, without extending the duration of surgery.
Laryngoscope, 130:1158–1165, 2020</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.28408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31758577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Edema ; Meta-analysis ; Nose ; osteotomy ; Otolaryngology ; Pain ; Piezosurgery ; Plastic surgery ; Rhinoplasty ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2020-05, Vol.130 (5), p.1158-1165</ispartof><rights>2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-3ca50fc7e2f0644fd837cff3290785e89046a5142e2ea5c25fdbf55861b945fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-3ca50fc7e2f0644fd837cff3290785e89046a5142e2ea5c25fdbf55861b945fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7216-3018 ; 0000-0001-6035-9566</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirza, Ahmad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alandejani, Talal A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Sayed, Ahmed A.</creatorcontrib><title>Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objective
Piezosurgery, used in different otolaryngology procedures, was a breakthrough in surgery. We systematically reviewed the differences in outcomes after lateral nasal osteotomy with peizosurgery and conventional osteotome and quantified the differences through a meta‐analysis.
Methods
Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were selected to search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published before January 2019 that detailed differences between piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy. The key search terms included “rhinoplasty" and “piezosurgery.” Only RCTs in English with patients >18 years who underwent lateral osteotomy by percutaneous or internal approaches were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed in data extraction and study inclusion. Two independent reviewers assessed the relevance of the studies. The point of estimate in the meta‐analysis was the standardized mean difference and was pooled with the random‐effects model. The measured outcomes were ecchymosis, edema, postoperative pain, and duration of surgery.
Results
Five RCTs met our criteria and were analyzed in primary subsequent meta‐analyses. Piezosurgery demonstrated significantly lower edema (SMD = ‐0.75; 95% CI, ‐1.26, ‐0.24) and ecchymosis scores (SMD = ‐0.85; 95% CI, ‐1.49, ‐0.20) on postoperative days (POD) 2 or 3 than conventional surgery. They were also significantly lower with piezosurgery than conventional surgery on POD 7 (SMD = ‐0.64; 95% CI, ‐1.21, ‐0.06; and SMD = ‐0.64; 95% CI, ‐1.14, ‐0.14, respectively). Two studies that estimated the degree of pain showed that after piezosurgery, patients experienced lesser pain than after conventional surgery. The mean difference was ‐0.73 (95% CI, ‐1.06, ‐0.39).
Conclusions
Piezosurgery causes less ecchymosis, edema, and pain than conventional osteotomy, without extending the duration of surgery.
Laryngoscope, 130:1158–1165, 2020</description><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>osteotomy</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Piezosurgery</subject><subject>Plastic surgery</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtqGzEUhkVJqB23mz5AEGQTAuPq6tF0Z0xuYEgoLbSrQZaPGoWZkSPN2ExWeYQ-Y58kcux0kUVWZ_F_5-ecD6EvlIwpIexrpUM_ZkoQ9QENqeQ0E0UhD9AwhTxTkv0aoKMY7wmhOZfkIxpwmksl83yIFrcOHn3swh8IPV5DiF3ExjdraFrnG11hH1vwra977Boc7lzjV5WObf8NT3HsU1jr1hkcYO1gg3WzxDW0-t_TX522--jiJ3RodRXh836O0M-L8x-zq2x-c3k9m84zw2WuMm60JNbkwCyZCGGXiufGWs4KkisJqiBioiUVDBhoaZi0y4WVUk3oohDSGj5Cp7veVfAPHcS2rF00UFW6Ad_FkqWvJ0QIUST05A1677uQ7t1ShaBMUE4TdbajTPAxBrDlKrg6yS4pKbfmy6358sV8go_3ld2ihuV_9FV1AugO2LgK-neqyvn0--9d6TNjQJDM</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Mirza, Ahmad A.</creator><creator>Alandejani, Talal A.</creator><creator>Al‐Sayed, Ahmed A.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-3018</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6035-9566</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Mirza, Ahmad A. ; Alandejani, Talal A. ; Al‐Sayed, Ahmed A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-3ca50fc7e2f0644fd837cff3290785e89046a5142e2ea5c25fdbf55861b945fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>osteotomy</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Piezosurgery</topic><topic>Plastic surgery</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirza, Ahmad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alandejani, Talal A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Sayed, Ahmed A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirza, Ahmad A.</au><au>Alandejani, Talal A.</au><au>Al‐Sayed, Ahmed A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1158</spage><epage>1165</epage><pages>1158-1165</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objective
Piezosurgery, used in different otolaryngology procedures, was a breakthrough in surgery. We systematically reviewed the differences in outcomes after lateral nasal osteotomy with peizosurgery and conventional osteotome and quantified the differences through a meta‐analysis.
Methods
Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were selected to search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published before January 2019 that detailed differences between piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy. The key search terms included “rhinoplasty" and “piezosurgery.” Only RCTs in English with patients >18 years who underwent lateral osteotomy by percutaneous or internal approaches were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed in data extraction and study inclusion. Two independent reviewers assessed the relevance of the studies. The point of estimate in the meta‐analysis was the standardized mean difference and was pooled with the random‐effects model. The measured outcomes were ecchymosis, edema, postoperative pain, and duration of surgery.
Results
Five RCTs met our criteria and were analyzed in primary subsequent meta‐analyses. Piezosurgery demonstrated significantly lower edema (SMD = ‐0.75; 95% CI, ‐1.26, ‐0.24) and ecchymosis scores (SMD = ‐0.85; 95% CI, ‐1.49, ‐0.20) on postoperative days (POD) 2 or 3 than conventional surgery. They were also significantly lower with piezosurgery than conventional surgery on POD 7 (SMD = ‐0.64; 95% CI, ‐1.21, ‐0.06; and SMD = ‐0.64; 95% CI, ‐1.14, ‐0.14, respectively). Two studies that estimated the degree of pain showed that after piezosurgery, patients experienced lesser pain than after conventional surgery. The mean difference was ‐0.73 (95% CI, ‐1.06, ‐0.39).
Conclusions
Piezosurgery causes less ecchymosis, edema, and pain than conventional osteotomy, without extending the duration of surgery.
Laryngoscope, 130:1158–1165, 2020</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31758577</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.28408</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-3018</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6035-9566</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 2020-05, Vol.130 (5), p.1158-1165 |
issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317604449 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Edema Meta-analysis Nose osteotomy Otolaryngology Pain Piezosurgery Plastic surgery Rhinoplasty Systematic review |
title | Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A34%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Piezosurgery%20versus%20conventional%20osteotomy%20in%20rhinoplasty:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Mirza,%20Ahmad%20A.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1158&rft.epage=1165&rft.pages=1158-1165&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.28408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2317604449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-3ca50fc7e2f0644fd837cff3290785e89046a5142e2ea5c25fdbf55861b945fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2394124131&rft_id=info:pmid/31758577&rfr_iscdi=true |