Loading…
Effects of a standardized distraction on caregivers’ perceptive performance with avatar-based and conventional patient monitoring: a multicenter comparative study
Patient monitoring requires constant attention and may be particularly vulnerable to distractions, which frequently occur during perioperative work. In this study, we compared anesthesia providers’ perceptive performance and perceived workload under distraction for conventional and avatar-based moni...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.1369-1378 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-80e87017e87971c861449eed845f5314cccd9897b88beae19c3e754745339ef53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-80e87017e87971c861449eed845f5314cccd9897b88beae19c3e754745339ef53 |
container_end_page | 1378 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1369 |
container_title | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Pfarr, Juliane Ganter, Michael T. Spahn, Donat R. Noethiger, Christoph B. Tscholl, David W. |
description | Patient monitoring requires constant attention and may be particularly vulnerable to distractions, which frequently occur during perioperative work. In this study, we compared anesthesia providers’ perceptive performance and perceived workload under distraction for conventional and avatar-based monitoring, a situation awareness-based technology that displays patient status as an animated patient model. In this prospective, multicenter study with a within-subject design, 38 participants evaluated scenarios of 3- and 10-s durations using conventional and avatar-based monitoring, under standardized distraction in the form of a simple calculation task. We quantified perceptual performance as the number of vital signs correctly remembered out of the total of 11 vital signs shown. We quantified perceived workload using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index score. Anesthesia providers remembered more vital signs under distraction using the avatar monitoring technology in the 3-s scenario: 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 5–7) vs. 3 (IQR 2–4), p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10877-019-00429-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2318745469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2318745469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-80e87017e87971c861449eed845f5314cccd9897b88beae19c3e754745339ef53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EomXhBTggH7kY7DhZ29xQVVqkSlzgbM06k-IqiYPtLGpPvAZ3nownYbZbOCJZ9tj65rM0P2MvlXyjpDRvi5LWGCGVE1K2jRPNI3aqOqNFs1XtY6q1NUJpaU7Ys1JupJTOavWUnWhlttY17Sn7dT4MGGrhaeDAS4W5h9zHO-x5H0vNEGpMM6cVION13GMuv3_85AvmgEul-6EcUp5gDsi_x_qVwx4qZLGDQhYS8pDmPc4HEYx8gRrpwqc0x5pynK_f0c_TOtYY6B0z4dMCGe7lpa797XP2ZICx4IuHc8O-fDj_fHYprj5dfDx7fyWCdl0VVqI1UhnanVHB0hBah9jbths6rdoQQu-sMztrdwioXNBouta0ndYOCdmw10fvktO3FUv1UywBxxFmTGvxjVaW6HbrCG2OaMiplIyDX3KcIN96Jf0hHX9Mx1M6_j4d6t6wVw_-dTdh_6_lbxwE6CNQlsNgMPubtGaaWvmf9g9BlqAU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2318745469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of a standardized distraction on caregivers’ perceptive performance with avatar-based and conventional patient monitoring: a multicenter comparative study</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Pfarr, Juliane ; Ganter, Michael T. ; Spahn, Donat R. ; Noethiger, Christoph B. ; Tscholl, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfarr, Juliane ; Ganter, Michael T. ; Spahn, Donat R. ; Noethiger, Christoph B. ; Tscholl, David W.</creatorcontrib><description>Patient monitoring requires constant attention and may be particularly vulnerable to distractions, which frequently occur during perioperative work. In this study, we compared anesthesia providers’ perceptive performance and perceived workload under distraction for conventional and avatar-based monitoring, a situation awareness-based technology that displays patient status as an animated patient model. In this prospective, multicenter study with a within-subject design, 38 participants evaluated scenarios of 3- and 10-s durations using conventional and avatar-based monitoring, under standardized distraction in the form of a simple calculation task. We quantified perceptual performance as the number of vital signs correctly remembered out of the total of 11 vital signs shown. We quantified perceived workload using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index score. Anesthesia providers remembered more vital signs under distraction using the avatar monitoring technology in the 3-s scenario: 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 5–7) vs. 3 (IQR 2–4), p < 0.001, mean of differences (MoD): 3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1 to 4), and in the 10-s monitoring task: 6 (IQR 5–8) vs. 4 (IQR 2–7), p = 0.028, MoD: 1 (95% CI 0.2 to 3). Participants rated perceived workload lower under distraction with the avatar in the 3-s scenario: 65 (IQR 40–79) vs. 75 (IQR 51–88), p = 0.007, MoD: 9 (95% CI 3 to 15), and in the 10-s scenario: 68 (IQR 50–80) vs. 75 (IQR 65–86), p = 0.019, MoD: 10 (95% CI 2 to 18). Avatar-based monitoring improved anesthesia providers’ perceptive performance under distraction and reduced perceived workload. This technology could help to improve caregivers’ situation awareness, especially in high-workload situations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00429-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31768924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Critical Care Medicine ; Health Sciences ; Intensive ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Research ; Statistics for Life Sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.1369-1378</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-80e87017e87971c861449eed845f5314cccd9897b88beae19c3e754745339ef53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-80e87017e87971c861449eed845f5314cccd9897b88beae19c3e754745339ef53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3677-3705</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfarr, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganter, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spahn, Donat R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noethiger, Christoph B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tscholl, David W.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of a standardized distraction on caregivers’ perceptive performance with avatar-based and conventional patient monitoring: a multicenter comparative study</title><title>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</title><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><description>Patient monitoring requires constant attention and may be particularly vulnerable to distractions, which frequently occur during perioperative work. In this study, we compared anesthesia providers’ perceptive performance and perceived workload under distraction for conventional and avatar-based monitoring, a situation awareness-based technology that displays patient status as an animated patient model. In this prospective, multicenter study with a within-subject design, 38 participants evaluated scenarios of 3- and 10-s durations using conventional and avatar-based monitoring, under standardized distraction in the form of a simple calculation task. We quantified perceptual performance as the number of vital signs correctly remembered out of the total of 11 vital signs shown. We quantified perceived workload using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index score. Anesthesia providers remembered more vital signs under distraction using the avatar monitoring technology in the 3-s scenario: 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 5–7) vs. 3 (IQR 2–4), p < 0.001, mean of differences (MoD): 3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1 to 4), and in the 10-s monitoring task: 6 (IQR 5–8) vs. 4 (IQR 2–7), p = 0.028, MoD: 1 (95% CI 0.2 to 3). Participants rated perceived workload lower under distraction with the avatar in the 3-s scenario: 65 (IQR 40–79) vs. 75 (IQR 51–88), p = 0.007, MoD: 9 (95% CI 3 to 15), and in the 10-s scenario: 68 (IQR 50–80) vs. 75 (IQR 65–86), p = 0.019, MoD: 10 (95% CI 2 to 18). Avatar-based monitoring improved anesthesia providers’ perceptive performance under distraction and reduced perceived workload. This technology could help to improve caregivers’ situation awareness, especially in high-workload situations.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Health Sciences</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Statistics for Life Sciences</subject><issn>1387-1307</issn><issn>1573-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EomXhBTggH7kY7DhZ29xQVVqkSlzgbM06k-IqiYPtLGpPvAZ3nownYbZbOCJZ9tj65rM0P2MvlXyjpDRvi5LWGCGVE1K2jRPNI3aqOqNFs1XtY6q1NUJpaU7Ys1JupJTOavWUnWhlttY17Sn7dT4MGGrhaeDAS4W5h9zHO-x5H0vNEGpMM6cVION13GMuv3_85AvmgEul-6EcUp5gDsi_x_qVwx4qZLGDQhYS8pDmPc4HEYx8gRrpwqc0x5pynK_f0c_TOtYY6B0z4dMCGe7lpa797XP2ZICx4IuHc8O-fDj_fHYprj5dfDx7fyWCdl0VVqI1UhnanVHB0hBah9jbths6rdoQQu-sMztrdwioXNBouta0ndYOCdmw10fvktO3FUv1UywBxxFmTGvxjVaW6HbrCG2OaMiplIyDX3KcIN96Jf0hHX9Mx1M6_j4d6t6wVw_-dTdh_6_lbxwE6CNQlsNgMPubtGaaWvmf9g9BlqAU</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Pfarr, Juliane</creator><creator>Ganter, Michael T.</creator><creator>Spahn, Donat R.</creator><creator>Noethiger, Christoph B.</creator><creator>Tscholl, David W.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3677-3705</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Effects of a standardized distraction on caregivers’ perceptive performance with avatar-based and conventional patient monitoring: a multicenter comparative study</title><author>Pfarr, Juliane ; Ganter, Michael T. ; Spahn, Donat R. ; Noethiger, Christoph B. ; Tscholl, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-80e87017e87971c861449eed845f5314cccd9897b88beae19c3e754745339ef53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Health Sciences</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Statistics for Life Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfarr, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganter, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spahn, Donat R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noethiger, Christoph B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tscholl, David W.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfarr, Juliane</au><au>Ganter, Michael T.</au><au>Spahn, Donat R.</au><au>Noethiger, Christoph B.</au><au>Tscholl, David W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of a standardized distraction on caregivers’ perceptive performance with avatar-based and conventional patient monitoring: a multicenter comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Monit Comput</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1369</spage><epage>1378</epage><pages>1369-1378</pages><issn>1387-1307</issn><eissn>1573-2614</eissn><abstract>Patient monitoring requires constant attention and may be particularly vulnerable to distractions, which frequently occur during perioperative work. In this study, we compared anesthesia providers’ perceptive performance and perceived workload under distraction for conventional and avatar-based monitoring, a situation awareness-based technology that displays patient status as an animated patient model. In this prospective, multicenter study with a within-subject design, 38 participants evaluated scenarios of 3- and 10-s durations using conventional and avatar-based monitoring, under standardized distraction in the form of a simple calculation task. We quantified perceptual performance as the number of vital signs correctly remembered out of the total of 11 vital signs shown. We quantified perceived workload using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index score. Anesthesia providers remembered more vital signs under distraction using the avatar monitoring technology in the 3-s scenario: 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 5–7) vs. 3 (IQR 2–4), p < 0.001, mean of differences (MoD): 3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1 to 4), and in the 10-s monitoring task: 6 (IQR 5–8) vs. 4 (IQR 2–7), p = 0.028, MoD: 1 (95% CI 0.2 to 3). Participants rated perceived workload lower under distraction with the avatar in the 3-s scenario: 65 (IQR 40–79) vs. 75 (IQR 51–88), p = 0.007, MoD: 9 (95% CI 3 to 15), and in the 10-s scenario: 68 (IQR 50–80) vs. 75 (IQR 65–86), p = 0.019, MoD: 10 (95% CI 2 to 18). Avatar-based monitoring improved anesthesia providers’ perceptive performance under distraction and reduced perceived workload. This technology could help to improve caregivers’ situation awareness, especially in high-workload situations.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>31768924</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10877-019-00429-2</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3677-3705</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-1307 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.1369-1378 |
issn | 1387-1307 1573-2614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2318745469 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Anesthesiology Critical Care Medicine Health Sciences Intensive Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Research Statistics for Life Sciences |
title | Effects of a standardized distraction on caregivers’ perceptive performance with avatar-based and conventional patient monitoring: a multicenter comparative study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A12%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20a%20standardized%20distraction%20on%20caregivers%E2%80%99%20perceptive%20performance%20with%20avatar-based%20and%20conventional%20patient%20monitoring:%20a%20multicenter%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20monitoring%20and%20computing&rft.au=Pfarr,%20Juliane&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1369&rft.epage=1378&rft.pages=1369-1378&rft.issn=1387-1307&rft.eissn=1573-2614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10877-019-00429-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2318745469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-80e87017e87971c861449eed845f5314cccd9897b88beae19c3e754745339ef53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2318745469&rft_id=info:pmid/31768924&rfr_iscdi=true |