Whole digesta properties as influenced by feed processing explain variation in gastrointestinal transit times in pigs

• Published in: British journal of nutrition 2019-12, Vol.122 (11), p.1242-1254
• Main Authors: Martens, Bianca M J, Noorloos, Marit, de Vries, Sonja, Schols, Henk A, Bruininx, Erik M A M, Gerrits, Walter J J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amino acids; Amylose; Animals; Barley; Cereals; Corn; Design of experiments; Diet; Extrusion; Feed processing; Feeds; Gastrointestinal system; Gastrointestinal tract; Hogs; Intestine; Liquids; Meals; Moisture content; Nutrient transport; Particle size; Physicochemical properties; Properties (attributes); Proteins; Retention; Rheology; Shear stress; Small intestine; Solids; Starch; Stomach; Swine; Transit time; Water content
• ISSN: 0007-1145; 1475-2662
• DOI: 10.1017/S0007114519002198

Physicochemical properties of diets are believed to play a major role in the regulation of digesta transit in the gastrointestinal tract. Starch, being the dominant nutrient in pig diets, strongly influences these properties. We studied transport of digesta solids and liquids through the upper gastrointestinal tract of ninety pigs in a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement. Dietary treatments varied in starch source (barley, maize and high-amylose maize) and form (isolated starch, ground cereal and extruded cereal). Mean retention times (MRT) of digesta solids ranged 129-225 min for the stomach and 86-124 min for the small intestine (SI). The MRT of solids consistently exceeded that of liquids in the stomach, but not in the SI. Solid digesta of pigs fed extruded cereals remained 29-75 min shorter in the stomach compared with pigs fed ground cereals (P < 0·001). Shear stress of whole digesta positively correlated with solid digesta MRT in the stomach (r 0·33, P < 0·001), but not in the SI. The saturation ratio (SR), the actual amount of water in stomach digesta as a fraction of the theoretical maximum held by the digesta matrix, explained more variation in digesta MRT than shear stress. The predictability of SR was hampered by the accumulation of large particles in the stomach. In addition, the water-holding capacity of gelatinised starch leads to a decreased SR of diets, but not of stomach digesta, which was caused by gastric hydrolysis of starch. Both of these phenomena hinder the predictability of gastric retention times based on feed properties.