Loading…

Comparison of Voice Quality of Life in Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma Treated with Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Radiofrequency Microdissection Electrodes, Laser Cordectomy, and Radiotherapy

To compare the quality of life of patients with early glottic carcinoma who have been treated using three treatment modalities: endoscopic cordectomy using radiofrequency microdissection electrodes (ECRM), transoral laser cordectomy, and radiotherapy (RT). ECRM, transoral laser cordectomy, and RT ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of voice 2021-05, Vol.35 (3), p.477-482
Main Authors: Demir, Berat, Binnetoglu, Adem, Gurol, Ece, Oysu, Cagatay
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-87debd70934e039041053541932a784e6400f8e710a26139215ec58e9a9823a83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-87debd70934e039041053541932a784e6400f8e710a26139215ec58e9a9823a83
container_end_page 482
container_issue 3
container_start_page 477
container_title Journal of voice
container_volume 35
creator Demir, Berat
Binnetoglu, Adem
Gurol, Ece
Oysu, Cagatay
description To compare the quality of life of patients with early glottic carcinoma who have been treated using three treatment modalities: endoscopic cordectomy using radiofrequency microdissection electrodes (ECRM), transoral laser cordectomy, and radiotherapy (RT). ECRM, transoral laser cordectomy, and RT can all be used as alternatives to invasive open surgery to treat the early stages of glottic cancer such as stage T1. Patients treated using these different modalities could have different outcomes with respect to voice quality of life. The voice quality of life was measured in patients who underwent ECRM, transoral diode laser excision, or RT for early laryngeal cancer. Post-treatment quality of voice was assessed using the Turkish version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life questionnaire in all patients after 1 year of cancer-free survival. A comparison was then made between the outcomes of the three groups. The total score of the ECRM group, when compared independently to that of the laser and the RT groups, was found to be statistically higher in both cases. However, no statistically significant differences were found between laser and RT groups in terms of any parameters. There was a statistically significant difference between the RT group and the other groups in terms of percentage jitter, percentage shimmer, and fundamental frequency (F0) (P < 0.05). While the RT group had the longest maximum phonation time (P < 0.001), no significant differences were found between the maximum phonation time of the ECRM and the laser groups (P < 0.001). Overall, the worst outcome with respect to voice quality of life is seen with ECRM. Since there were no significant differences in quality of life between the other two treatment modalities, it is recommended to leave the choice between RT and laser surgery up to the patient.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2320381248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0892199719304382</els_id><sourcerecordid>2320381248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-87debd70934e039041053541932a784e6400f8e710a26139215ec58e9a9823a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiNEJZbCP-DgI4cm9UeysS9IaLUtSIsQ_eBqGXvSziqJg-0tym_rn8NROPTEaUbjdx7N67coPjBaMcq2l8fq-OTRQsUpUxVjFaXiVbFhshVl3Uj5uthQqXjJlGrfFG9jPFJKeX7dFM87P0wmYPQj8R35uWDIj5PpMc3L4IAdEBzJ3oR-JrfJPAC57n1KaMnOBIujHwy5C2ASOPIH0yPZj85H66dF4YMDm_wwk_uI4wO5MQ59F-D3CUY7k29og3cYYxZhvmDf5yZPIF6Qg4kQXhAuiBndCkiPEMw0vyvOOtNHeP-vnhf3V_u73Zfy8P366-7zobRCqFTK1sEv11IlaqBC0ZrRRjQ1U4KbVtawrSntJLSMGr5lQnHWgG0kKKMkF0aK8-Ljyp2Cz4fHpAeMFvrejOBPUXPBqZCM14u0XqXZV4wBOj0FHEyYNaN6yUof9ZqVXrLSjOmcVV77tK5BtvGEEHS0mH8IHIbsXjuP_wf8BYSFob8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2320381248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Voice Quality of Life in Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma Treated with Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Radiofrequency Microdissection Electrodes, Laser Cordectomy, and Radiotherapy</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Demir, Berat ; Binnetoglu, Adem ; Gurol, Ece ; Oysu, Cagatay</creator><creatorcontrib>Demir, Berat ; Binnetoglu, Adem ; Gurol, Ece ; Oysu, Cagatay</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the quality of life of patients with early glottic carcinoma who have been treated using three treatment modalities: endoscopic cordectomy using radiofrequency microdissection electrodes (ECRM), transoral laser cordectomy, and radiotherapy (RT). ECRM, transoral laser cordectomy, and RT can all be used as alternatives to invasive open surgery to treat the early stages of glottic cancer such as stage T1. Patients treated using these different modalities could have different outcomes with respect to voice quality of life. The voice quality of life was measured in patients who underwent ECRM, transoral diode laser excision, or RT for early laryngeal cancer. Post-treatment quality of voice was assessed using the Turkish version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life questionnaire in all patients after 1 year of cancer-free survival. A comparison was then made between the outcomes of the three groups. The total score of the ECRM group, when compared independently to that of the laser and the RT groups, was found to be statistically higher in both cases. However, no statistically significant differences were found between laser and RT groups in terms of any parameters. There was a statistically significant difference between the RT group and the other groups in terms of percentage jitter, percentage shimmer, and fundamental frequency (F0) (P &lt; 0.05). While the RT group had the longest maximum phonation time (P &lt; 0.001), no significant differences were found between the maximum phonation time of the ECRM and the laser groups (P &lt; 0.001). Overall, the worst outcome with respect to voice quality of life is seen with ECRM. Since there were no significant differences in quality of life between the other two treatment modalities, it is recommended to leave the choice between RT and laser surgery up to the patient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-1997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Laryngeal cancer ; Laser ; Radiofrequency ablation ; Radiotherapy ; Voice quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of voice, 2021-05, Vol.35 (3), p.477-482</ispartof><rights>2019 The Voice Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-87debd70934e039041053541932a784e6400f8e710a26139215ec58e9a9823a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-87debd70934e039041053541932a784e6400f8e710a26139215ec58e9a9823a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demir, Berat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binnetoglu, Adem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurol, Ece</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oysu, Cagatay</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Voice Quality of Life in Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma Treated with Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Radiofrequency Microdissection Electrodes, Laser Cordectomy, and Radiotherapy</title><title>Journal of voice</title><description>To compare the quality of life of patients with early glottic carcinoma who have been treated using three treatment modalities: endoscopic cordectomy using radiofrequency microdissection electrodes (ECRM), transoral laser cordectomy, and radiotherapy (RT). ECRM, transoral laser cordectomy, and RT can all be used as alternatives to invasive open surgery to treat the early stages of glottic cancer such as stage T1. Patients treated using these different modalities could have different outcomes with respect to voice quality of life. The voice quality of life was measured in patients who underwent ECRM, transoral diode laser excision, or RT for early laryngeal cancer. Post-treatment quality of voice was assessed using the Turkish version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life questionnaire in all patients after 1 year of cancer-free survival. A comparison was then made between the outcomes of the three groups. The total score of the ECRM group, when compared independently to that of the laser and the RT groups, was found to be statistically higher in both cases. However, no statistically significant differences were found between laser and RT groups in terms of any parameters. There was a statistically significant difference between the RT group and the other groups in terms of percentage jitter, percentage shimmer, and fundamental frequency (F0) (P &lt; 0.05). While the RT group had the longest maximum phonation time (P &lt; 0.001), no significant differences were found between the maximum phonation time of the ECRM and the laser groups (P &lt; 0.001). Overall, the worst outcome with respect to voice quality of life is seen with ECRM. Since there were no significant differences in quality of life between the other two treatment modalities, it is recommended to leave the choice between RT and laser surgery up to the patient.</description><subject>Laryngeal cancer</subject><subject>Laser</subject><subject>Radiofrequency ablation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Voice quality</subject><issn>0892-1997</issn><issn>1873-4588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiNEJZbCP-DgI4cm9UeysS9IaLUtSIsQ_eBqGXvSziqJg-0tym_rn8NROPTEaUbjdx7N67coPjBaMcq2l8fq-OTRQsUpUxVjFaXiVbFhshVl3Uj5uthQqXjJlGrfFG9jPFJKeX7dFM87P0wmYPQj8R35uWDIj5PpMc3L4IAdEBzJ3oR-JrfJPAC57n1KaMnOBIujHwy5C2ASOPIH0yPZj85H66dF4YMDm_wwk_uI4wO5MQ59F-D3CUY7k29og3cYYxZhvmDf5yZPIF6Qg4kQXhAuiBndCkiPEMw0vyvOOtNHeP-vnhf3V_u73Zfy8P366-7zobRCqFTK1sEv11IlaqBC0ZrRRjQ1U4KbVtawrSntJLSMGr5lQnHWgG0kKKMkF0aK8-Ljyp2Cz4fHpAeMFvrejOBPUXPBqZCM14u0XqXZV4wBOj0FHEyYNaN6yUof9ZqVXrLSjOmcVV77tK5BtvGEEHS0mH8IHIbsXjuP_wf8BYSFob8</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Demir, Berat</creator><creator>Binnetoglu, Adem</creator><creator>Gurol, Ece</creator><creator>Oysu, Cagatay</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Comparison of Voice Quality of Life in Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma Treated with Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Radiofrequency Microdissection Electrodes, Laser Cordectomy, and Radiotherapy</title><author>Demir, Berat ; Binnetoglu, Adem ; Gurol, Ece ; Oysu, Cagatay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-87debd70934e039041053541932a784e6400f8e710a26139215ec58e9a9823a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Laryngeal cancer</topic><topic>Laser</topic><topic>Radiofrequency ablation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Voice quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demir, Berat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binnetoglu, Adem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurol, Ece</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oysu, Cagatay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demir, Berat</au><au>Binnetoglu, Adem</au><au>Gurol, Ece</au><au>Oysu, Cagatay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Voice Quality of Life in Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma Treated with Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Radiofrequency Microdissection Electrodes, Laser Cordectomy, and Radiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>482</epage><pages>477-482</pages><issn>0892-1997</issn><eissn>1873-4588</eissn><abstract>To compare the quality of life of patients with early glottic carcinoma who have been treated using three treatment modalities: endoscopic cordectomy using radiofrequency microdissection electrodes (ECRM), transoral laser cordectomy, and radiotherapy (RT). ECRM, transoral laser cordectomy, and RT can all be used as alternatives to invasive open surgery to treat the early stages of glottic cancer such as stage T1. Patients treated using these different modalities could have different outcomes with respect to voice quality of life. The voice quality of life was measured in patients who underwent ECRM, transoral diode laser excision, or RT for early laryngeal cancer. Post-treatment quality of voice was assessed using the Turkish version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life questionnaire in all patients after 1 year of cancer-free survival. A comparison was then made between the outcomes of the three groups. The total score of the ECRM group, when compared independently to that of the laser and the RT groups, was found to be statistically higher in both cases. However, no statistically significant differences were found between laser and RT groups in terms of any parameters. There was a statistically significant difference between the RT group and the other groups in terms of percentage jitter, percentage shimmer, and fundamental frequency (F0) (P &lt; 0.05). While the RT group had the longest maximum phonation time (P &lt; 0.001), no significant differences were found between the maximum phonation time of the ECRM and the laser groups (P &lt; 0.001). Overall, the worst outcome with respect to voice quality of life is seen with ECRM. Since there were no significant differences in quality of life between the other two treatment modalities, it is recommended to leave the choice between RT and laser surgery up to the patient.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-1997
ispartof Journal of voice, 2021-05, Vol.35 (3), p.477-482
issn 0892-1997
1873-4588
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2320381248
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Laryngeal cancer
Laser
Radiofrequency ablation
Radiotherapy
Voice quality
title Comparison of Voice Quality of Life in Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma Treated with Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Radiofrequency Microdissection Electrodes, Laser Cordectomy, and Radiotherapy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A40%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Voice%20Quality%20of%20Life%20in%20Early%20Stage%20Glottic%20Carcinoma%20Treated%20with%20Endoscopic%20Cordectomy%20Using%20Radiofrequency%20Microdissection%20Electrodes,%20Laser%20Cordectomy,%20and%20Radiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20voice&rft.au=Demir,%20Berat&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=482&rft.pages=477-482&rft.issn=0892-1997&rft.eissn=1873-4588&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2320381248%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-87debd70934e039041053541932a784e6400f8e710a26139215ec58e9a9823a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2320381248&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true