The performance of bovine serum albumin filtration by using polyethersulfone-Tetronic 304 blend Ultrafiltration Membrane [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

Background: Membrane technology has been widely applied for protein purification. In applications for protein separation, a membrane with stable filtration performance is necessary. In this work, two types of hollow fiber membranes with different characteristic were used to study the filtration prof...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:F1000 research 2019, Vol.8, p.953-953
Main Authors: Razi, Fachrul, Mulyati, Sri, Arahman, Nasrul
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-243d38212cf1682578a4818299ff493c4c12b4272fca633f3a8516cd7d28e6d13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-243d38212cf1682578a4818299ff493c4c12b4272fca633f3a8516cd7d28e6d13
container_end_page 953
container_issue
container_start_page 953
container_title F1000 research
container_volume 8
creator Razi, Fachrul
Mulyati, Sri
Arahman, Nasrul
description Background: Membrane technology has been widely applied for protein purification. In applications for protein separation, a membrane with stable filtration performance is necessary. In this work, two types of hollow fiber membranes with different characteristic were used to study the filtration profile of bovine serum albumin. Methods: A single piece of hollow fiber module was used for ultrafiltration testing using UF0 and UFT304 membranes. Flux and rejection of BSA solution were collected based on a pressure-driven inside filtration model. Results: Ultrafiltration experiments showed that the flux of UFT304 membrane was higher than that of UF0 membrane in all applied pressure condition. Solute rejection was achieved up to 90% for ultrafiltration of BSA solution by using UF0 membrane obtained on the operating pressure of 0.5 atm. Conclusion: In general, UFT304 membranes has better ultrafiltration performance for BSA separation than UF0 membranes. The UFT304 membrane has a more stable flux for up to two hours of filtration.
doi_str_mv 10.12688/f1000research.18740.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322753086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322753086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-243d38212cf1682578a4818299ff493c4c12b4272fca633f3a8516cd7d28e6d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUha2olRKleYWKZTZO4cJgnKyiqH9Sqm4mq6pCGF8yVNg4YDuap-or1p6plHTTFYh7vnMPOkXxntErBlKpD45RShNmNMnurpiqxDI5Kc6AClkyQeHNq_tpcZHzrwWgdc0lVGfF7-0OyYDJxdSZ3iKJjjRx9j2SjGnqiAnN1PmeOB_GZEYfe9LsyZR9_0iGGPY47jDlKbjYY7nFMcXeW8KpIE3AviUPK_YK_oZdk8xi_2NeuPWF3SwBMJGEs8fnawLEDEOKM7bk2Y87sn4uzQc6_3xXvHUmZLz4e54XD58-bu--lPffP3-9u70vLafAShC85QoYWMekgk2ljFBMQV07J2puhWXQCKjAWSM5d9yoDZO2rVpQKFvGz4vLo--S5GnCPOrOZ4shLNHjlDVwgGrDqZKLVB6lNsWcEzo9JN-ZtNeM6kNJ-p-S9KEkve64PoLO2CmM-1WkX1T_h_8AgladZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322753086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The performance of bovine serum albumin filtration by using polyethersulfone-Tetronic 304 blend Ultrafiltration Membrane [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Razi, Fachrul ; Mulyati, Sri ; Arahman, Nasrul</creator><creatorcontrib>Razi, Fachrul ; Mulyati, Sri ; Arahman, Nasrul</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Membrane technology has been widely applied for protein purification. In applications for protein separation, a membrane with stable filtration performance is necessary. In this work, two types of hollow fiber membranes with different characteristic were used to study the filtration profile of bovine serum albumin. Methods: A single piece of hollow fiber module was used for ultrafiltration testing using UF0 and UFT304 membranes. Flux and rejection of BSA solution were collected based on a pressure-driven inside filtration model. Results: Ultrafiltration experiments showed that the flux of UFT304 membrane was higher than that of UF0 membrane in all applied pressure condition. Solute rejection was achieved up to 90% for ultrafiltration of BSA solution by using UF0 membrane obtained on the operating pressure of 0.5 atm. Conclusion: In general, UFT304 membranes has better ultrafiltration performance for BSA separation than UF0 membranes. The UFT304 membrane has a more stable flux for up to two hours of filtration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-1402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-1402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.18740.1</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>F1000 research, 2019, Vol.8, p.953-953</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2019 Razi F et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-243d38212cf1682578a4818299ff493c4c12b4272fca633f3a8516cd7d28e6d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-243d38212cf1682578a4818299ff493c4c12b4272fca633f3a8516cd7d28e6d13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5077-2867</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,37013</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Razi, Fachrul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulyati, Sri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arahman, Nasrul</creatorcontrib><title>The performance of bovine serum albumin filtration by using polyethersulfone-Tetronic 304 blend Ultrafiltration Membrane [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]</title><title>F1000 research</title><description>Background: Membrane technology has been widely applied for protein purification. In applications for protein separation, a membrane with stable filtration performance is necessary. In this work, two types of hollow fiber membranes with different characteristic were used to study the filtration profile of bovine serum albumin. Methods: A single piece of hollow fiber module was used for ultrafiltration testing using UF0 and UFT304 membranes. Flux and rejection of BSA solution were collected based on a pressure-driven inside filtration model. Results: Ultrafiltration experiments showed that the flux of UFT304 membrane was higher than that of UF0 membrane in all applied pressure condition. Solute rejection was achieved up to 90% for ultrafiltration of BSA solution by using UF0 membrane obtained on the operating pressure of 0.5 atm. Conclusion: In general, UFT304 membranes has better ultrafiltration performance for BSA separation than UF0 membranes. The UFT304 membrane has a more stable flux for up to two hours of filtration.</description><issn>2046-1402</issn><issn>2046-1402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUha2olRKleYWKZTZO4cJgnKyiqH9Sqm4mq6pCGF8yVNg4YDuap-or1p6plHTTFYh7vnMPOkXxntErBlKpD45RShNmNMnurpiqxDI5Kc6AClkyQeHNq_tpcZHzrwWgdc0lVGfF7-0OyYDJxdSZ3iKJjjRx9j2SjGnqiAnN1PmeOB_GZEYfe9LsyZR9_0iGGPY47jDlKbjYY7nFMcXeW8KpIE3AviUPK_YK_oZdk8xi_2NeuPWF3SwBMJGEs8fnawLEDEOKM7bk2Y87sn4uzQc6_3xXvHUmZLz4e54XD58-bu--lPffP3-9u70vLafAShC85QoYWMekgk2ljFBMQV07J2puhWXQCKjAWSM5d9yoDZO2rVpQKFvGz4vLo--S5GnCPOrOZ4shLNHjlDVwgGrDqZKLVB6lNsWcEzo9JN-ZtNeM6kNJ-p-S9KEkve64PoLO2CmM-1WkX1T_h_8AgladZw</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Razi, Fachrul</creator><creator>Mulyati, Sri</creator><creator>Arahman, Nasrul</creator><scope>C-E</scope><scope>CH4</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5077-2867</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>The performance of bovine serum albumin filtration by using polyethersulfone-Tetronic 304 blend Ultrafiltration Membrane [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]</title><author>Razi, Fachrul ; Mulyati, Sri ; Arahman, Nasrul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-243d38212cf1682578a4818299ff493c4c12b4272fca633f3a8516cd7d28e6d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Razi, Fachrul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulyati, Sri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arahman, Nasrul</creatorcontrib><collection>F1000Research</collection><collection>Faculty of 1000</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>F1000 research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Razi, Fachrul</au><au>Mulyati, Sri</au><au>Arahman, Nasrul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The performance of bovine serum albumin filtration by using polyethersulfone-Tetronic 304 blend Ultrafiltration Membrane [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]</atitle><jtitle>F1000 research</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>953</spage><epage>953</epage><pages>953-953</pages><issn>2046-1402</issn><eissn>2046-1402</eissn><abstract>Background: Membrane technology has been widely applied for protein purification. In applications for protein separation, a membrane with stable filtration performance is necessary. In this work, two types of hollow fiber membranes with different characteristic were used to study the filtration profile of bovine serum albumin. Methods: A single piece of hollow fiber module was used for ultrafiltration testing using UF0 and UFT304 membranes. Flux and rejection of BSA solution were collected based on a pressure-driven inside filtration model. Results: Ultrafiltration experiments showed that the flux of UFT304 membrane was higher than that of UF0 membrane in all applied pressure condition. Solute rejection was achieved up to 90% for ultrafiltration of BSA solution by using UF0 membrane obtained on the operating pressure of 0.5 atm. Conclusion: In general, UFT304 membranes has better ultrafiltration performance for BSA separation than UF0 membranes. The UFT304 membrane has a more stable flux for up to two hours of filtration.</abstract><doi>10.12688/f1000research.18740.1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5077-2867</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-1402
ispartof F1000 research, 2019, Vol.8, p.953-953
issn 2046-1402
2046-1402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322753086
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
title The performance of bovine serum albumin filtration by using polyethersulfone-Tetronic 304 blend Ultrafiltration Membrane [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A06%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20performance%20of%20bovine%20serum%20albumin%20filtration%20by%20using%20polyethersulfone-Tetronic%20304%20blend%20Ultrafiltration%20Membrane%20%5Bversion%201;%20peer%20review:%202%20approved%20with%20reservations%5D&rft.jtitle=F1000%20research&rft.au=Razi,%20Fachrul&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=953&rft.epage=953&rft.pages=953-953&rft.issn=2046-1402&rft.eissn=2046-1402&rft_id=info:doi/10.12688/f1000research.18740.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2322753086%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-243d38212cf1682578a4818299ff493c4c12b4272fca633f3a8516cd7d28e6d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322753086&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true