Patient Risk Factors for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The choice of valve type for aortic valve replacement surgery is sometimes challenging. The main risk for bioprostheses is structural valve degeneration (SVD); however, little is known about what the most important risk factors are. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heart, lung & circulation lung & circulation, 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.668-678
Main Authors: Ochi, Ayame, Cheng, Kevin, Zhao, Bing, Hardikar, Ashutosh A., Negishi, Kazuaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aortic valve
Aortic Valve - surgery
Bioprosthesis - adverse effects
Heart Valve Diseases - surgery
Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Humans
Meta-analysis
Postoperative Complications
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Risk Factors
Structural valve degeneration
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6d61d96ac7e257a10dc233eec47dbb08a5111505c8c8720d96dbcf811a7ec983
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6d61d96ac7e257a10dc233eec47dbb08a5111505c8c8720d96dbcf811a7ec983
container_end_page 678
container_issue 5
container_start_page 668
container_title Heart, lung & circulation
container_volume 29
creator Ochi, Ayame
Cheng, Kevin
Zhao, Bing
Hardikar, Ashutosh A.
Negishi, Kazuaki
description The choice of valve type for aortic valve replacement surgery is sometimes challenging. The main risk for bioprostheses is structural valve degeneration (SVD); however, little is known about what the most important risk factors are. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the risk factors and estimate their pooled effect sizes to aid the prosthesis choice for replacement. We followed PRISMA guidelines and systematically searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) using appropriate key terms: ‘aortic valve’, ‘bioprosthesis’, ‘degeneration’, ‘durability’, ‘prosthesis failure’, etc. Hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Pooled risk estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-nine (29) observational studies were included with a total of 25,490 patients, 981 of whom developed SVD over a mean follow-up time of 18.5 years. Four (4) factors influencing bioprosthetic SVD were identified: increasing age was a protective factor (per 1-yr increase, HR: 0.91 [95% CI 0.89, 0.94], p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.09.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327378993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1443950619314830</els_id><sourcerecordid>2327378993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6d61d96ac7e257a10dc233eec47dbb08a5111505c8c8720d96dbcf811a7ec983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOAyEUhonReH8AN4alm6kcmBu6qncTjUaNW0LhVKnTmQpU07eXserS5CSHxff_4XyE7AEbAIPycDJ4bcyAM5ADlgbECtmEPM8zXku--v0WmSxYuUG2QpgwBlUu5DrZEFALKUq-SV7udXTYRvrgwhu90CZ2PtBx5-mJ62a-C_EVozN02Pl-PevmA-kZvmCLPiW79ogO6eMiRJzqHnjAD4efVLeW3mLU2bDVzSK4sEPWxroJuPuzt8nTxfnT6VV2c3d5fTq8yYwoRMxKW4KVpTYV8qLSwKzhQiCavLKjEat1AQAFK0xt6oqzhNqRGdcAukIja7FNDpa16evvcwxRTV0w2DS6xW4eFBe8ElUtpUgoLFGTrgwex2rm3VT7hQKmer1qopJe1etVLA30mf2f-vloivYv8eszAcdLANONyYRXwSS9Bq3zaKKynfun_gvbXItg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2327378993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Risk Factors for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ochi, Ayame ; Cheng, Kevin ; Zhao, Bing ; Hardikar, Ashutosh A. ; Negishi, Kazuaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Ochi, Ayame ; Cheng, Kevin ; Zhao, Bing ; Hardikar, Ashutosh A. ; Negishi, Kazuaki</creatorcontrib><description>The choice of valve type for aortic valve replacement surgery is sometimes challenging. The main risk for bioprostheses is structural valve degeneration (SVD); however, little is known about what the most important risk factors are. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the risk factors and estimate their pooled effect sizes to aid the prosthesis choice for replacement. We followed PRISMA guidelines and systematically searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) using appropriate key terms: ‘aortic valve’, ‘bioprosthesis’, ‘degeneration’, ‘durability’, ‘prosthesis failure’, etc. Hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Pooled risk estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-nine (29) observational studies were included with a total of 25,490 patients, 981 of whom developed SVD over a mean follow-up time of 18.5 years. Four (4) factors influencing bioprosthetic SVD were identified: increasing age was a protective factor (per 1-yr increase, HR: 0.91 [95% CI 0.89, 0.94], p&lt;0.0001), whereas increased body surface area (HR 1.77 [1.04, 3.01], p=0.034), patient−prosthesis mismatch (HR 1.95 [1.56, 2.43], p&lt;0.001), and smoking (HR 2.28 [1.37, 3.79], p=0.0015) were risk factors for SVD. We found younger age, patient−prosthesis mismatch, body surface area, and smoking, as risk factors for aortic SVD, which should be considered for valve selection. This study generates a further hypothesis that accelerated flow across the valve is a shared key component in the pathophysiology of SVD, thus future research should consider other high cardiac output states.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1443-9506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1444-2892</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.09.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31839362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aortic valve ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Bioprosthesis - adverse effects ; Heart Valve Diseases - surgery ; Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Humans ; Meta-analysis ; Postoperative Complications ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Risk Factors ; Structural valve degeneration</subject><ispartof>Heart, lung &amp; circulation, 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.668-678</ispartof><rights>2019 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6d61d96ac7e257a10dc233eec47dbb08a5111505c8c8720d96dbcf811a7ec983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6d61d96ac7e257a10dc233eec47dbb08a5111505c8c8720d96dbcf811a7ec983</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5423-971X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31839362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ochi, Ayame</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardikar, Ashutosh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negishi, Kazuaki</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Risk Factors for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Heart, lung &amp; circulation</title><addtitle>Heart Lung Circ</addtitle><description>The choice of valve type for aortic valve replacement surgery is sometimes challenging. The main risk for bioprostheses is structural valve degeneration (SVD); however, little is known about what the most important risk factors are. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the risk factors and estimate their pooled effect sizes to aid the prosthesis choice for replacement. We followed PRISMA guidelines and systematically searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) using appropriate key terms: ‘aortic valve’, ‘bioprosthesis’, ‘degeneration’, ‘durability’, ‘prosthesis failure’, etc. Hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Pooled risk estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-nine (29) observational studies were included with a total of 25,490 patients, 981 of whom developed SVD over a mean follow-up time of 18.5 years. Four (4) factors influencing bioprosthetic SVD were identified: increasing age was a protective factor (per 1-yr increase, HR: 0.91 [95% CI 0.89, 0.94], p&lt;0.0001), whereas increased body surface area (HR 1.77 [1.04, 3.01], p=0.034), patient−prosthesis mismatch (HR 1.95 [1.56, 2.43], p&lt;0.001), and smoking (HR 2.28 [1.37, 3.79], p=0.0015) were risk factors for SVD. We found younger age, patient−prosthesis mismatch, body surface area, and smoking, as risk factors for aortic SVD, which should be considered for valve selection. This study generates a further hypothesis that accelerated flow across the valve is a shared key component in the pathophysiology of SVD, thus future research should consider other high cardiac output states.</description><subject>Aortic valve</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Bioprosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Heart Valve Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Structural valve degeneration</subject><issn>1443-9506</issn><issn>1444-2892</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOAyEUhonReH8AN4alm6kcmBu6qncTjUaNW0LhVKnTmQpU07eXserS5CSHxff_4XyE7AEbAIPycDJ4bcyAM5ADlgbECtmEPM8zXku--v0WmSxYuUG2QpgwBlUu5DrZEFALKUq-SV7udXTYRvrgwhu90CZ2PtBx5-mJ62a-C_EVozN02Pl-PevmA-kZvmCLPiW79ogO6eMiRJzqHnjAD4efVLeW3mLU2bDVzSK4sEPWxroJuPuzt8nTxfnT6VV2c3d5fTq8yYwoRMxKW4KVpTYV8qLSwKzhQiCavLKjEat1AQAFK0xt6oqzhNqRGdcAukIja7FNDpa16evvcwxRTV0w2DS6xW4eFBe8ElUtpUgoLFGTrgwex2rm3VT7hQKmer1qopJe1etVLA30mf2f-vloivYv8eszAcdLANONyYRXwSS9Bq3zaKKynfun_gvbXItg</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Ochi, Ayame</creator><creator>Cheng, Kevin</creator><creator>Zhao, Bing</creator><creator>Hardikar, Ashutosh A.</creator><creator>Negishi, Kazuaki</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5423-971X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Patient Risk Factors for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Ochi, Ayame ; Cheng, Kevin ; Zhao, Bing ; Hardikar, Ashutosh A. ; Negishi, Kazuaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6d61d96ac7e257a10dc233eec47dbb08a5111505c8c8720d96dbcf811a7ec983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aortic valve</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Bioprosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Heart Valve Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Structural valve degeneration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ochi, Ayame</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardikar, Ashutosh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negishi, Kazuaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart, lung &amp; circulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ochi, Ayame</au><au>Cheng, Kevin</au><au>Zhao, Bing</au><au>Hardikar, Ashutosh A.</au><au>Negishi, Kazuaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Risk Factors for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Heart, lung &amp; circulation</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Lung Circ</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>668</spage><epage>678</epage><pages>668-678</pages><issn>1443-9506</issn><eissn>1444-2892</eissn><abstract>The choice of valve type for aortic valve replacement surgery is sometimes challenging. The main risk for bioprostheses is structural valve degeneration (SVD); however, little is known about what the most important risk factors are. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the risk factors and estimate their pooled effect sizes to aid the prosthesis choice for replacement. We followed PRISMA guidelines and systematically searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) using appropriate key terms: ‘aortic valve’, ‘bioprosthesis’, ‘degeneration’, ‘durability’, ‘prosthesis failure’, etc. Hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Pooled risk estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-nine (29) observational studies were included with a total of 25,490 patients, 981 of whom developed SVD over a mean follow-up time of 18.5 years. Four (4) factors influencing bioprosthetic SVD were identified: increasing age was a protective factor (per 1-yr increase, HR: 0.91 [95% CI 0.89, 0.94], p&lt;0.0001), whereas increased body surface area (HR 1.77 [1.04, 3.01], p=0.034), patient−prosthesis mismatch (HR 1.95 [1.56, 2.43], p&lt;0.001), and smoking (HR 2.28 [1.37, 3.79], p=0.0015) were risk factors for SVD. We found younger age, patient−prosthesis mismatch, body surface area, and smoking, as risk factors for aortic SVD, which should be considered for valve selection. This study generates a further hypothesis that accelerated flow across the valve is a shared key component in the pathophysiology of SVD, thus future research should consider other high cardiac output states.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31839362</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hlc.2019.09.013</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5423-971X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1443-9506
ispartof Heart, lung & circulation, 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.668-678
issn 1443-9506
1444-2892
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327378993
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aortic valve
Aortic Valve - surgery
Bioprosthesis - adverse effects
Heart Valve Diseases - surgery
Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Humans
Meta-analysis
Postoperative Complications
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Risk Factors
Structural valve degeneration
title Patient Risk Factors for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T15%3A57%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Risk%20Factors%20for%20Bioprosthetic%20Aortic%20Valve%20Degeneration:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Heart,%20lung%20&%20circulation&rft.au=Ochi,%20Ayame&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=668&rft.epage=678&rft.pages=668-678&rft.issn=1443-9506&rft.eissn=1444-2892&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.09.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2327378993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6d61d96ac7e257a10dc233eec47dbb08a5111505c8c8720d96dbcf811a7ec983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2327378993&rft_id=info:pmid/31839362&rfr_iscdi=true