A sampling system for flowing powders based on the theory of sampling

• Published in: International journal of pharmaceutics 2020-01, Vol.574, p.118874-118874, Article 118874
• Main Authors: Alvarado-Hernández, Barbara B., Sierra-Vega, Nobel O., Martínez-Cartagena, Pedro, Hormaza, Manuel, Méndez, Rafael, Romañach, Rodolfo J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Blend uniformity analysis; Flow rate; Near infrared spectroscopy; Powder technology; Process analytical technology; Process sampling; Theory of sampling
• ISSN: 0378-5173; 1873-3476
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118874

[Display omitted] An innovative chute and stream sampler system for flowing powders has been developed and tested. The system is designed for representative sampling based on the principles of the Theory of Sampling (TOS). The sampling system was used in combination with near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy to determine the drug concentration of flowing powders. The system is comprised of three parts: a chute, a stream sampler and a sample collection port. The NIR spectra were obtained at the chute, before entering the sampler, and as the powder flowed through the stream sampler. Samples were also collected from the sample collection port to be analyzed using an ultraviolet-visible (UV–Vis) reference method to determine drug content. A total of eight pharmaceutical powder blends, ranging in concentration from 10.5(%w/w) to 19.5(%w/w) of caffeine, were used to test the sampling system. Materials were characterized before blends were made to provide information on flow properties. The throughput of the system was between 30 and 35 kg/h based on the flow properties of the blend. Drug concentration was effectively determined at the chute and stream sampler. The NIR calibration models showed low root mean squared errors of prediction, 0.65(%w/w) and 0.51(%w/w), for the chute and stream sampler respectively. The NIR calibration models also showed low bias values −0.36(%w/w) at the chute and 0.057(%w/w) at the stream sampler. Significant agreement was obtained between the results from the nondestructive NIR versus the destructive UV–Vis method. Variographic analysis was performed to estimate the analytical and sampling errors when determining the drug concentration at the chute and stream sampler respectively. The variographic analysis showed low analytical errors, 0.103(%w/w)2 and 0.181(%w/w)2 at the chute and stream sampler respectively. The analysis also showed that the minimum practical error (MPE) was around 0.2(%w/w)2 at both chute and stream sampler.