Loading…

Validation of two methods to measure posterior tilt in femoral neck fractures

•The intra and inter observer reliability of the Posterior Tilt Measurement is substantial.•The intra observer reliability of the Lateral Garden Angle is substantial and the inter observer reliability is moderate.•Both the Posterior Tilt Measurement and the Lateral Garden Angle are reliable methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Injury 2020-02, Vol.51 (2), p.380-383
Main Authors: Kalsbeek, J.H., van Walsum, A.D.P., Roerdink, W.H., van Vugt, A.B., van de Krol, H., Schipper, I.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ab134b40ae41439841df1c49231389d72b7dee7f94b913c2abd59d4d296eea4f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ab134b40ae41439841df1c49231389d72b7dee7f94b913c2abd59d4d296eea4f3
container_end_page 383
container_issue 2
container_start_page 380
container_title Injury
container_volume 51
creator Kalsbeek, J.H.
van Walsum, A.D.P.
Roerdink, W.H.
van Vugt, A.B.
van de Krol, H.
Schipper, I.B.
description •The intra and inter observer reliability of the Posterior Tilt Measurement is substantial.•The intra observer reliability of the Lateral Garden Angle is substantial and the inter observer reliability is moderate.•Both the Posterior Tilt Measurement and the Lateral Garden Angle are reliable methods to measure posterior tilt of Femoral Neck Fractures.•The Posterior Tilt Measurement has a slight preference over the Lateral Garden Angle due to better interobserver reliability. Posterior tilt of the femoral head in femoral neck fractures (FNF) may influence stability of the fracture and may therefore affect the treatment outcome. Posterior tilt can be measured with different methods. The Lateral Garden Angle (LGA) has been used for this purpose for decades and more recently the Posterior Tilt Measurement (PTM) was introduced. Despite the fact that both methods (LGA and PTM) are used in multiple studies, they have never been compared for reliability in a direct study. The aim of this study is to analyze the intra and inter observer reliability of the LGA described by Garden and the PTM according to Palm. Four observers measured the posterior tilt on the radiographs of 50 FNF two times with both methods. Intra and inter observer reliability were determined for the LGA and the PTM. The intra observer reliability for both methods is substantial with an intra class coefficient of 0.75. The inter observer reliability of the PTM is also substantial with an intra class coefficient of 0.75 compared to a moderate reliability of the LGA with an intraclass coefficient of 0.60. Based on our results we believe the LGA and the PTM are both reliable methods to measure posterior tilt. Yet the Posterior Tilt Measurement seems to have a better inter observer reliability and therefore has a slight preference over the Lateral Garden Angle.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327382479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138319307673</els_id><sourcerecordid>2327382479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ab134b40ae41439841df1c49231389d72b7dee7f94b913c2abd59d4d296eea4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQQC0EoqXwBwj5yCXBW5P4goQqNqmIC3C1HHsiXJK42A6of0-qFo6cZjR6sz2EzinJKaHF1Sp3_WoIm5wRKnPKckLYAZrSqpQZYUV5iKZjhWSUV3yCTmJcEUJLwvkxmnBacSnYfIqe3nTrrE7O99g3OH173EF69zbitE11HALgtY8JgvMBJ9cm7HrcQOeDbnEP5gM3QZs0cvEUHTW6jXC2jzP0enf7snjIls_3j4ubZWZ4wVKma8pFLYgGQQWXlaC2oUZIxsdjpS1ZXVqAspGilpQbpms7l1ZYJgsALRo-Q5e7uevgPweISXUuGmhb3YMfomKclbxiopQjKnaoCT7GAI1aB9fpsFGUqK1ItVI7kWorUlGmRm1j28V-w1B3YP-afs2NwPUOgPHPLwdBReOgN2BdAJOU9e7_DT8h7Yb1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2327382479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of two methods to measure posterior tilt in femoral neck fractures</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kalsbeek, J.H. ; van Walsum, A.D.P. ; Roerdink, W.H. ; van Vugt, A.B. ; van de Krol, H. ; Schipper, I.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalsbeek, J.H. ; van Walsum, A.D.P. ; Roerdink, W.H. ; van Vugt, A.B. ; van de Krol, H. ; Schipper, I.B.</creatorcontrib><description>•The intra and inter observer reliability of the Posterior Tilt Measurement is substantial.•The intra observer reliability of the Lateral Garden Angle is substantial and the inter observer reliability is moderate.•Both the Posterior Tilt Measurement and the Lateral Garden Angle are reliable methods to measure posterior tilt of Femoral Neck Fractures.•The Posterior Tilt Measurement has a slight preference over the Lateral Garden Angle due to better interobserver reliability. Posterior tilt of the femoral head in femoral neck fractures (FNF) may influence stability of the fracture and may therefore affect the treatment outcome. Posterior tilt can be measured with different methods. The Lateral Garden Angle (LGA) has been used for this purpose for decades and more recently the Posterior Tilt Measurement (PTM) was introduced. Despite the fact that both methods (LGA and PTM) are used in multiple studies, they have never been compared for reliability in a direct study. The aim of this study is to analyze the intra and inter observer reliability of the LGA described by Garden and the PTM according to Palm. Four observers measured the posterior tilt on the radiographs of 50 FNF two times with both methods. Intra and inter observer reliability were determined for the LGA and the PTM. The intra observer reliability for both methods is substantial with an intra class coefficient of 0.75. The inter observer reliability of the PTM is also substantial with an intra class coefficient of 0.75 compared to a moderate reliability of the LGA with an intraclass coefficient of 0.60. Based on our results we believe the LGA and the PTM are both reliable methods to measure posterior tilt. Yet the Posterior Tilt Measurement seems to have a better inter observer reliability and therefore has a slight preference over the Lateral Garden Angle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31839425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Injury, 2020-02, Vol.51 (2), p.380-383</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ab134b40ae41439841df1c49231389d72b7dee7f94b913c2abd59d4d296eea4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ab134b40ae41439841df1c49231389d72b7dee7f94b913c2abd59d4d296eea4f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31839425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalsbeek, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Walsum, A.D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roerdink, W.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vugt, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Krol, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, I.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of two methods to measure posterior tilt in femoral neck fractures</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>•The intra and inter observer reliability of the Posterior Tilt Measurement is substantial.•The intra observer reliability of the Lateral Garden Angle is substantial and the inter observer reliability is moderate.•Both the Posterior Tilt Measurement and the Lateral Garden Angle are reliable methods to measure posterior tilt of Femoral Neck Fractures.•The Posterior Tilt Measurement has a slight preference over the Lateral Garden Angle due to better interobserver reliability. Posterior tilt of the femoral head in femoral neck fractures (FNF) may influence stability of the fracture and may therefore affect the treatment outcome. Posterior tilt can be measured with different methods. The Lateral Garden Angle (LGA) has been used for this purpose for decades and more recently the Posterior Tilt Measurement (PTM) was introduced. Despite the fact that both methods (LGA and PTM) are used in multiple studies, they have never been compared for reliability in a direct study. The aim of this study is to analyze the intra and inter observer reliability of the LGA described by Garden and the PTM according to Palm. Four observers measured the posterior tilt on the radiographs of 50 FNF two times with both methods. Intra and inter observer reliability were determined for the LGA and the PTM. The intra observer reliability for both methods is substantial with an intra class coefficient of 0.75. The inter observer reliability of the PTM is also substantial with an intra class coefficient of 0.75 compared to a moderate reliability of the LGA with an intraclass coefficient of 0.60. Based on our results we believe the LGA and the PTM are both reliable methods to measure posterior tilt. Yet the Posterior Tilt Measurement seems to have a better inter observer reliability and therefore has a slight preference over the Lateral Garden Angle.</description><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQQC0EoqXwBwj5yCXBW5P4goQqNqmIC3C1HHsiXJK42A6of0-qFo6cZjR6sz2EzinJKaHF1Sp3_WoIm5wRKnPKckLYAZrSqpQZYUV5iKZjhWSUV3yCTmJcEUJLwvkxmnBacSnYfIqe3nTrrE7O99g3OH173EF69zbitE11HALgtY8JgvMBJ9cm7HrcQOeDbnEP5gM3QZs0cvEUHTW6jXC2jzP0enf7snjIls_3j4ubZWZ4wVKma8pFLYgGQQWXlaC2oUZIxsdjpS1ZXVqAspGilpQbpms7l1ZYJgsALRo-Q5e7uevgPweISXUuGmhb3YMfomKclbxiopQjKnaoCT7GAI1aB9fpsFGUqK1ItVI7kWorUlGmRm1j28V-w1B3YP-afs2NwPUOgPHPLwdBReOgN2BdAJOU9e7_DT8h7Yb1</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Kalsbeek, J.H.</creator><creator>van Walsum, A.D.P.</creator><creator>Roerdink, W.H.</creator><creator>van Vugt, A.B.</creator><creator>van de Krol, H.</creator><creator>Schipper, I.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Validation of two methods to measure posterior tilt in femoral neck fractures</title><author>Kalsbeek, J.H. ; van Walsum, A.D.P. ; Roerdink, W.H. ; van Vugt, A.B. ; van de Krol, H. ; Schipper, I.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ab134b40ae41439841df1c49231389d72b7dee7f94b913c2abd59d4d296eea4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalsbeek, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Walsum, A.D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roerdink, W.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vugt, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Krol, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, I.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalsbeek, J.H.</au><au>van Walsum, A.D.P.</au><au>Roerdink, W.H.</au><au>van Vugt, A.B.</au><au>van de Krol, H.</au><au>Schipper, I.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of two methods to measure posterior tilt in femoral neck fractures</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>380</spage><epage>383</epage><pages>380-383</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>•The intra and inter observer reliability of the Posterior Tilt Measurement is substantial.•The intra observer reliability of the Lateral Garden Angle is substantial and the inter observer reliability is moderate.•Both the Posterior Tilt Measurement and the Lateral Garden Angle are reliable methods to measure posterior tilt of Femoral Neck Fractures.•The Posterior Tilt Measurement has a slight preference over the Lateral Garden Angle due to better interobserver reliability. Posterior tilt of the femoral head in femoral neck fractures (FNF) may influence stability of the fracture and may therefore affect the treatment outcome. Posterior tilt can be measured with different methods. The Lateral Garden Angle (LGA) has been used for this purpose for decades and more recently the Posterior Tilt Measurement (PTM) was introduced. Despite the fact that both methods (LGA and PTM) are used in multiple studies, they have never been compared for reliability in a direct study. The aim of this study is to analyze the intra and inter observer reliability of the LGA described by Garden and the PTM according to Palm. Four observers measured the posterior tilt on the radiographs of 50 FNF two times with both methods. Intra and inter observer reliability were determined for the LGA and the PTM. The intra observer reliability for both methods is substantial with an intra class coefficient of 0.75. The inter observer reliability of the PTM is also substantial with an intra class coefficient of 0.75 compared to a moderate reliability of the LGA with an intraclass coefficient of 0.60. Based on our results we believe the LGA and the PTM are both reliable methods to measure posterior tilt. Yet the Posterior Tilt Measurement seems to have a better inter observer reliability and therefore has a slight preference over the Lateral Garden Angle.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31839425</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.002</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2020-02, Vol.51 (2), p.380-383
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327382479
source ScienceDirect Journals
title Validation of two methods to measure posterior tilt in femoral neck fractures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A18%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20two%20methods%20to%20measure%20posterior%20tilt%20in%20femoral%20neck%20fractures&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Kalsbeek,%20J.H.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=380&rft.epage=383&rft.pages=380-383&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2327382479%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ab134b40ae41439841df1c49231389d72b7dee7f94b913c2abd59d4d296eea4f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2327382479&rft_id=info:pmid/31839425&rfr_iscdi=true