Loading…
Comparison of wet bulb globe temperature measured on-site vs estimated and the impact on activity modification in high school football
Exertional heat stroke is one of the top three causes of death in young athletes, particularly high school football players. Despite evidence that these deaths are completely avoidable with appropriate prevention and treatment, deaths still occur at an alarming rate. Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of biometeorology 2020-04, Vol.64 (4), p.593-600 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Exertional heat stroke is one of the top three causes of death in young athletes, particularly high school football players. Despite evidence that these deaths are completely avoidable with appropriate prevention and treatment, deaths still occur at an alarming rate. Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is the preferred method of both the National Athletic Trainers’ Association and American College of Sports Medicine to measure heat intensity. Based on the WBGT, activity modification guidelines (AMG) dictate work-to-rest ratios, activity levels and duration, protective equipment worn, and length and frequency of hydration breaks. Due to the cost of handheld WBGT monitors, smartphone apps that estimate WBGT have been considered an alternative. However, it is unclear how WBGT values estimated by these smartphone apps compare to those measured on-site using handheld WBGT monitors. We compared WBGT values estimated by a commercial smartphone app to those taken on-site at the same time and place. Thirteen athletic trainers measured WBGT in the field during high school football practices over a three-month season in North Central Florida. A paired sample t-test indicated the smartphone app significantly overestimated WBGT (29.0°C ± 4.1°C) compared to on-site measures (26.4°C ± 3.2°C) ( r =0.580; t(943)=-23.38, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-7128 1432-1254 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00484-019-01847-2 |