Loading…

Group sample sizes in nonregulated health care intervention trials described as randomized controlled trials were overly similar

We evaluated whether sample sizes in different arms of two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trials of nonregulated interventions were systematically closer in size than would plausibly occur by chance if simple randomization had been applied. We searched PubMed for trials of nonregulated hea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2020-04, Vol.120, p.8-16
Main Authors: Thombs, Brett D., Levis, Alexander W., Azar, Marleine, Saadat, Nazanin, Riehm, Kira E., Sanchez, Tatiana A., Chiovitti, Matthew J., Rice, Danielle B., Levis, Brooke, Fedoruk, Claire, Lyubenova, Anita, Malo Vázquez de Lara, Aurelio López, Kloda, Lorie A., Benedetti, Andrea, Shrier, Ian, Platt, Robert W., Kimmelman, Jonathan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We evaluated whether sample sizes in different arms of two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trials of nonregulated interventions were systematically closer in size than would plausibly occur by chance if simple randomization had been applied. We searched PubMed for trials of nonregulated health care interventions that did not report using restricted randomization from journals in behavioral sciences and psychology, nursing, nutrition and dietetics, rehabilitation, and surgery. We emailed trial authors to clarify randomization procedures. We identified 148 nonregulated intervention trials that indicated they used simple randomization. Difference in trial arm sizes was smaller than would be predicted by chance if simple randomization had occurred in all trials (P 
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.011