Loading…

‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance

Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health informatics journal 2020-09, Vol.26 (3), p.1881-1897
Main Authors: Joorabchi, Arash, Doherty, Cailbhe, Dawson, Jennifer
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893
container_end_page 1897
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1881
container_title Health informatics journal
container_volume 26
creator Joorabchi, Arash
Doherty, Cailbhe
Dawson, Jennifer
description Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking available reviews from the Cochrane library with disease-related Wikipedia articles and evaluating the relationship between the quality and importance of these articles with the number of relevant and cited Cochrane reviews. We first conducted a bibliometric analysis, identifying disease-related Wikipedia articles and relevant/cited Cochrane reviews. Citations were thematically coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Finally, separate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted for article quality and importance. The indexing system identified 4381 disease-related Wikipedia articles, 1193 (27%) of which cited a Cochrane review. Higher quality Wikipedia articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p = 0.002), while lower quality articles were less likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.0005). A greater number of Cochrane reviews are available for more ‘important’ Wikipedia articles (p < 0.005), and these articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.005). This approach to an indexing system can be leveraged by Wikipedia contributors and editors seeking to update disease-related Wikipedia articles with relevant Cochrane reviews (thus improving their quality), and online information seekers in need of additional information to supplement their Wikipedia search.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1460458219892711
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330062949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1460458219892711</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429458460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9q3DAQxkVpaf60956KIJce4kaypLWUW1matrDQEgI5GlkaJ0pkayPJhb3lFXJLXi9PUplNWgj0pEHz-75h5kPoAyWfKW2aI8oXhAtZUyVV3VD6Cu3ShtOqlpS-LnVpV3N_B-2ldEUIYUSwt2iHUbmQRNa76O7x9v78V70M5jLqER5vHw6xxjkEj70br914gc_dtVuDdfM3zpeAn2G8cl3UcXOMTyFNPicc-iLuXOddGCBHZ7Aetd8klzD81n7SeTbUMTvjAd9M2ru8KYzFbliHmPVo4B1602uf4P3Tu4_OTr6eLb9Xq5_ffiy_rCrDSZMrBVYYRoBbYU1jhFVKlLqrTW_7prOGK8UUEX3XELBAuTRUgQRijWBSsX30aWu7juFmgpTbwSUD3pfFwpTamjFCFrXiM3rwAr0KUyyLFYoXQshy50KRLWViSClC366jG8p5WkraOa32ZVpF8vHJeOoGsH8Fz_EUoNoCSV_Av6n_NfwDLv-f9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429458460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>SAGE Open Access Journals</source><creator>Joorabchi, Arash ; Doherty, Cailbhe ; Dawson, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Joorabchi, Arash ; Doherty, Cailbhe ; Dawson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking available reviews from the Cochrane library with disease-related Wikipedia articles and evaluating the relationship between the quality and importance of these articles with the number of relevant and cited Cochrane reviews. We first conducted a bibliometric analysis, identifying disease-related Wikipedia articles and relevant/cited Cochrane reviews. Citations were thematically coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Finally, separate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted for article quality and importance. The indexing system identified 4381 disease-related Wikipedia articles, 1193 (27%) of which cited a Cochrane review. Higher quality Wikipedia articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p = 0.002), while lower quality articles were less likely to cite a Cochrane review (p &lt; 0.0005). A greater number of Cochrane reviews are available for more ‘important’ Wikipedia articles (p &lt; 0.005), and these articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p &lt; 0.005). This approach to an indexing system can be leveraged by Wikipedia contributors and editors seeking to update disease-related Wikipedia articles with relevant Cochrane reviews (thus improving their quality), and online information seekers in need of additional information to supplement their Wikipedia search.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-4582</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1460458219892711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31868082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Automation ; Bibliometrics ; Indexing ; Libraries ; Quality ; Regression analysis</subject><ispartof>Health informatics journal, 2020-09, Vol.26 (3), p.1881-1897</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5284-856X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1460458219892711$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1460458219892711$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21966,27853,27924,27925,34135,44945,45333</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31868082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joorabchi, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Cailbhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance</title><title>Health informatics journal</title><addtitle>Health Informatics J</addtitle><description>Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking available reviews from the Cochrane library with disease-related Wikipedia articles and evaluating the relationship between the quality and importance of these articles with the number of relevant and cited Cochrane reviews. We first conducted a bibliometric analysis, identifying disease-related Wikipedia articles and relevant/cited Cochrane reviews. Citations were thematically coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Finally, separate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted for article quality and importance. The indexing system identified 4381 disease-related Wikipedia articles, 1193 (27%) of which cited a Cochrane review. Higher quality Wikipedia articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p = 0.002), while lower quality articles were less likely to cite a Cochrane review (p &lt; 0.0005). A greater number of Cochrane reviews are available for more ‘important’ Wikipedia articles (p &lt; 0.005), and these articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p &lt; 0.005). This approach to an indexing system can be leveraged by Wikipedia contributors and editors seeking to update disease-related Wikipedia articles with relevant Cochrane reviews (thus improving their quality), and online information seekers in need of additional information to supplement their Wikipedia search.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Indexing</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><issn>1460-4582</issn><issn>1741-2811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9q3DAQxkVpaf60956KIJce4kaypLWUW1matrDQEgI5GlkaJ0pkayPJhb3lFXJLXi9PUplNWgj0pEHz-75h5kPoAyWfKW2aI8oXhAtZUyVV3VD6Cu3ShtOqlpS-LnVpV3N_B-2ldEUIYUSwt2iHUbmQRNa76O7x9v78V70M5jLqER5vHw6xxjkEj70br914gc_dtVuDdfM3zpeAn2G8cl3UcXOMTyFNPicc-iLuXOddGCBHZ7Aetd8klzD81n7SeTbUMTvjAd9M2ru8KYzFbliHmPVo4B1602uf4P3Tu4_OTr6eLb9Xq5_ffiy_rCrDSZMrBVYYRoBbYU1jhFVKlLqrTW_7prOGK8UUEX3XELBAuTRUgQRijWBSsX30aWu7juFmgpTbwSUD3pfFwpTamjFCFrXiM3rwAr0KUyyLFYoXQshy50KRLWViSClC366jG8p5WkraOa32ZVpF8vHJeOoGsH8Fz_EUoNoCSV_Av6n_NfwDLv-f9g</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Joorabchi, Arash</creator><creator>Doherty, Cailbhe</creator><creator>Dawson, Jennifer</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-856X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance</title><author>Joorabchi, Arash ; Doherty, Cailbhe ; Dawson, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Indexing</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joorabchi, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Cailbhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health informatics journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joorabchi, Arash</au><au>Doherty, Cailbhe</au><au>Dawson, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance</atitle><jtitle>Health informatics journal</jtitle><addtitle>Health Informatics J</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1881</spage><epage>1897</epage><pages>1881-1897</pages><issn>1460-4582</issn><eissn>1741-2811</eissn><abstract>Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking available reviews from the Cochrane library with disease-related Wikipedia articles and evaluating the relationship between the quality and importance of these articles with the number of relevant and cited Cochrane reviews. We first conducted a bibliometric analysis, identifying disease-related Wikipedia articles and relevant/cited Cochrane reviews. Citations were thematically coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Finally, separate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted for article quality and importance. The indexing system identified 4381 disease-related Wikipedia articles, 1193 (27%) of which cited a Cochrane review. Higher quality Wikipedia articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p = 0.002), while lower quality articles were less likely to cite a Cochrane review (p &lt; 0.0005). A greater number of Cochrane reviews are available for more ‘important’ Wikipedia articles (p &lt; 0.005), and these articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p &lt; 0.005). This approach to an indexing system can be leveraged by Wikipedia contributors and editors seeking to update disease-related Wikipedia articles with relevant Cochrane reviews (thus improving their quality), and online information seekers in need of additional information to supplement their Wikipedia search.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31868082</pmid><doi>10.1177/1460458219892711</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-856X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-4582
ispartof Health informatics journal, 2020-09, Vol.26 (3), p.1881-1897
issn 1460-4582
1741-2811
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330062949
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); SAGE Open Access Journals
subjects Automation
Bibliometrics
Indexing
Libraries
Quality
Regression analysis
title ‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A23%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98WP2Cochrane%E2%80%99,%20a%20tool%20linking%20Wikipedia%20to%20the%20Cochrane%20Library:%20Results%20of%20a%20bibliometric%20analysis%20evaluating%20article%20quality%20and%20importance&rft.jtitle=Health%20informatics%20journal&rft.au=Joorabchi,%20Arash&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1881&rft.epage=1897&rft.pages=1881-1897&rft.issn=1460-4582&rft.eissn=1741-2811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1460458219892711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429458460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429458460&rft_id=info:pmid/31868082&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1460458219892711&rfr_iscdi=true