Loading…
‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance
Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health informatics journal 2020-09, Vol.26 (3), p.1881-1897 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893 |
container_end_page | 1897 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1881 |
container_title | Health informatics journal |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Joorabchi, Arash Doherty, Cailbhe Dawson, Jennifer |
description | Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking available reviews from the Cochrane library with disease-related Wikipedia articles and evaluating the relationship between the quality and importance of these articles with the number of relevant and cited Cochrane reviews. We first conducted a bibliometric analysis, identifying disease-related Wikipedia articles and relevant/cited Cochrane reviews. Citations were thematically coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Finally, separate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted for article quality and importance. The indexing system identified 4381 disease-related Wikipedia articles, 1193 (27%) of which cited a Cochrane review. Higher quality Wikipedia articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p = 0.002), while lower quality articles were less likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.0005). A greater number of Cochrane reviews are available for more ‘important’ Wikipedia articles (p < 0.005), and these articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.005). This approach to an indexing system can be leveraged by Wikipedia contributors and editors seeking to update disease-related Wikipedia articles with relevant Cochrane reviews (thus improving their quality), and online information seekers in need of additional information to supplement their Wikipedia search. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1460458219892711 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330062949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1460458219892711</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429458460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9q3DAQxkVpaf60956KIJce4kaypLWUW1matrDQEgI5GlkaJ0pkayPJhb3lFXJLXi9PUplNWgj0pEHz-75h5kPoAyWfKW2aI8oXhAtZUyVV3VD6Cu3ShtOqlpS-LnVpV3N_B-2ldEUIYUSwt2iHUbmQRNa76O7x9v78V70M5jLqER5vHw6xxjkEj70br914gc_dtVuDdfM3zpeAn2G8cl3UcXOMTyFNPicc-iLuXOddGCBHZ7Aetd8klzD81n7SeTbUMTvjAd9M2ru8KYzFbliHmPVo4B1602uf4P3Tu4_OTr6eLb9Xq5_ffiy_rCrDSZMrBVYYRoBbYU1jhFVKlLqrTW_7prOGK8UUEX3XELBAuTRUgQRijWBSsX30aWu7juFmgpTbwSUD3pfFwpTamjFCFrXiM3rwAr0KUyyLFYoXQshy50KRLWViSClC366jG8p5WkraOa32ZVpF8vHJeOoGsH8Fz_EUoNoCSV_Av6n_NfwDLv-f9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429458460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>SAGE Open Access Journals</source><creator>Joorabchi, Arash ; Doherty, Cailbhe ; Dawson, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Joorabchi, Arash ; Doherty, Cailbhe ; Dawson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking available reviews from the Cochrane library with disease-related Wikipedia articles and evaluating the relationship between the quality and importance of these articles with the number of relevant and cited Cochrane reviews. We first conducted a bibliometric analysis, identifying disease-related Wikipedia articles and relevant/cited Cochrane reviews. Citations were thematically coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Finally, separate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted for article quality and importance. The indexing system identified 4381 disease-related Wikipedia articles, 1193 (27%) of which cited a Cochrane review. Higher quality Wikipedia articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p = 0.002), while lower quality articles were less likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.0005). A greater number of Cochrane reviews are available for more ‘important’ Wikipedia articles (p < 0.005), and these articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.005). This approach to an indexing system can be leveraged by Wikipedia contributors and editors seeking to update disease-related Wikipedia articles with relevant Cochrane reviews (thus improving their quality), and online information seekers in need of additional information to supplement their Wikipedia search.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-4582</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1460458219892711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31868082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Automation ; Bibliometrics ; Indexing ; Libraries ; Quality ; Regression analysis</subject><ispartof>Health informatics journal, 2020-09, Vol.26 (3), p.1881-1897</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5284-856X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1460458219892711$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1460458219892711$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21966,27853,27924,27925,34135,44945,45333</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31868082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joorabchi, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Cailbhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance</title><title>Health informatics journal</title><addtitle>Health Informatics J</addtitle><description>Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking available reviews from the Cochrane library with disease-related Wikipedia articles and evaluating the relationship between the quality and importance of these articles with the number of relevant and cited Cochrane reviews. We first conducted a bibliometric analysis, identifying disease-related Wikipedia articles and relevant/cited Cochrane reviews. Citations were thematically coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Finally, separate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted for article quality and importance. The indexing system identified 4381 disease-related Wikipedia articles, 1193 (27%) of which cited a Cochrane review. Higher quality Wikipedia articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p = 0.002), while lower quality articles were less likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.0005). A greater number of Cochrane reviews are available for more ‘important’ Wikipedia articles (p < 0.005), and these articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.005). This approach to an indexing system can be leveraged by Wikipedia contributors and editors seeking to update disease-related Wikipedia articles with relevant Cochrane reviews (thus improving their quality), and online information seekers in need of additional information to supplement their Wikipedia search.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Indexing</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><issn>1460-4582</issn><issn>1741-2811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9q3DAQxkVpaf60956KIJce4kaypLWUW1matrDQEgI5GlkaJ0pkayPJhb3lFXJLXi9PUplNWgj0pEHz-75h5kPoAyWfKW2aI8oXhAtZUyVV3VD6Cu3ShtOqlpS-LnVpV3N_B-2ldEUIYUSwt2iHUbmQRNa76O7x9v78V70M5jLqER5vHw6xxjkEj70br914gc_dtVuDdfM3zpeAn2G8cl3UcXOMTyFNPicc-iLuXOddGCBHZ7Aetd8klzD81n7SeTbUMTvjAd9M2ru8KYzFbliHmPVo4B1602uf4P3Tu4_OTr6eLb9Xq5_ffiy_rCrDSZMrBVYYRoBbYU1jhFVKlLqrTW_7prOGK8UUEX3XELBAuTRUgQRijWBSsX30aWu7juFmgpTbwSUD3pfFwpTamjFCFrXiM3rwAr0KUyyLFYoXQshy50KRLWViSClC366jG8p5WkraOa32ZVpF8vHJeOoGsH8Fz_EUoNoCSV_Av6n_NfwDLv-f9g</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Joorabchi, Arash</creator><creator>Doherty, Cailbhe</creator><creator>Dawson, Jennifer</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-856X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance</title><author>Joorabchi, Arash ; Doherty, Cailbhe ; Dawson, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Indexing</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joorabchi, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Cailbhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health informatics journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joorabchi, Arash</au><au>Doherty, Cailbhe</au><au>Dawson, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance</atitle><jtitle>Health informatics journal</jtitle><addtitle>Health Informatics J</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1881</spage><epage>1897</epage><pages>1881-1897</pages><issn>1460-4582</issn><eissn>1741-2811</eissn><abstract>Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking available reviews from the Cochrane library with disease-related Wikipedia articles and evaluating the relationship between the quality and importance of these articles with the number of relevant and cited Cochrane reviews. We first conducted a bibliometric analysis, identifying disease-related Wikipedia articles and relevant/cited Cochrane reviews. Citations were thematically coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Finally, separate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted for article quality and importance. The indexing system identified 4381 disease-related Wikipedia articles, 1193 (27%) of which cited a Cochrane review. Higher quality Wikipedia articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p = 0.002), while lower quality articles were less likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.0005). A greater number of Cochrane reviews are available for more ‘important’ Wikipedia articles (p < 0.005), and these articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.005). This approach to an indexing system can be leveraged by Wikipedia contributors and editors seeking to update disease-related Wikipedia articles with relevant Cochrane reviews (thus improving their quality), and online information seekers in need of additional information to supplement their Wikipedia search.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31868082</pmid><doi>10.1177/1460458219892711</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-856X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1460-4582 |
ispartof | Health informatics journal, 2020-09, Vol.26 (3), p.1881-1897 |
issn | 1460-4582 1741-2811 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330062949 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); SAGE Open Access Journals |
subjects | Automation Bibliometrics Indexing Libraries Quality Regression analysis |
title | ‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A23%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98WP2Cochrane%E2%80%99,%20a%20tool%20linking%20Wikipedia%20to%20the%20Cochrane%20Library:%20Results%20of%20a%20bibliometric%20analysis%20evaluating%20article%20quality%20and%20importance&rft.jtitle=Health%20informatics%20journal&rft.au=Joorabchi,%20Arash&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1881&rft.epage=1897&rft.pages=1881-1897&rft.issn=1460-4582&rft.eissn=1741-2811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1460458219892711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429458460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-9ed5c30e4d5dc7c5d9954d5b2cfdf7bdc4993905fb70ede148c19e8e0dc53893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429458460&rft_id=info:pmid/31868082&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1460458219892711&rfr_iscdi=true |