Loading…

First trimester detection of fetal open spina bifida using BS/BSOB ratio

Background Despite the well-known second trimester ultrasound signs, current possibilities of in utero surgical repair of open spina bifida require a timely detection of the spine defect. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ratio between brain stem (BS) diameter and its distance to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2020-02, Vol.301 (2), p.333-340
Main Authors: Sirico, Angelo, Raffone, Antonio, Lanzone, Antonio, Saccone, Gabriele, Travaglino, Antonio, Sarno, Laura, Rizzo, Giuseppe, Zullo, Fulvio, Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9a37b3b77ed4315bb9de537cfd4bdbc63e0384700bd2ace8b84c5b84e74798783
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9a37b3b77ed4315bb9de537cfd4bdbc63e0384700bd2ace8b84c5b84e74798783
container_end_page 340
container_issue 2
container_start_page 333
container_title Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 301
creator Sirico, Angelo
Raffone, Antonio
Lanzone, Antonio
Saccone, Gabriele
Travaglino, Antonio
Sarno, Laura
Rizzo, Giuseppe
Zullo, Fulvio
Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
description Background Despite the well-known second trimester ultrasound signs, current possibilities of in utero surgical repair of open spina bifida require a timely detection of the spine defect. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ratio between brain stem (BS) diameter and its distance to the occipital bone (BSOB) (BS/BSOB ratio) in the detection of fetuses with open spina bifida at first trimester ultrasound. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was performed by searching seven electronic databases from their inception to February 2019 for all studies assessing the association between BS/BSOB ratio and diagnosis of spine bifida . Diagnostic accuracy of BS/BSOB ratio in prenatal diagnosis of spine bifida was assessed as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + and LR−), and area under the curve (AUC) on SROC curves. Results Four studies, including 17,598 fetuses with 23 cases of open spina bifida, were included in the meta-analysis. BS/BSOB ratio showed pooled sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.47–0.87; I 2  = 78.3%), specificity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.99–1.0; I 2  = 99.2%), LR + and LR− of 51.44 (95% CI 9.53–277.64; I 2  = 85.5%) and 0.23 (95% CI 0.04–1.17; I 2  = 64.8%), respectively, and an AUC of 0.9649. Conclusion First trimester BS/BSOB ratio has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting fetuses with open spina bifida.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00404-019-05422-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330597650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2359137413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9a37b3b77ed4315bb9de537cfd4bdbc63e0384700bd2ace8b84c5b84e74798783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EoqXwAgzIEgtL6Dm242SkFQWkSh0Ks2UnlypVmhQ7GXh7XFJAYmDxWbrv_jt9hFwzuGcAauoBBIgIWBaBFHEc8RMyZoLHESjGTskYssMfEjUiF95vAVicpsk5GXGWKhlLGJPnReV8RztX7dB36GiBHeZd1Ta0LWmJnalpu8eG-n3VGGqrsioM7X3VbOhsPZ2tVzPqTOAvyVlpao9Xxzohb4vH1_lztFw9vcwfllHOleyizHBluVUKC8GZtDYrUHKVl4Wwhc0TjsBToQBsEZscU5uKXIYHlVBZqlI-IXdD7t617324We8qn2Ndmwbb3uuYc5CZSiQE9PYPum1714TrAiUzxpVgPFDxQOWu9d5hqfdBhnEfmoE-eNaDZx086y_P-jB0c4zu7Q6Ln5FvsQHgA-BDq9mg-939T-wnCm2Ghw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2359137413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>First trimester detection of fetal open spina bifida using BS/BSOB ratio</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Sirico, Angelo ; Raffone, Antonio ; Lanzone, Antonio ; Saccone, Gabriele ; Travaglino, Antonio ; Sarno, Laura ; Rizzo, Giuseppe ; Zullo, Fulvio ; Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Sirico, Angelo ; Raffone, Antonio ; Lanzone, Antonio ; Saccone, Gabriele ; Travaglino, Antonio ; Sarno, Laura ; Rizzo, Giuseppe ; Zullo, Fulvio ; Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Background Despite the well-known second trimester ultrasound signs, current possibilities of in utero surgical repair of open spina bifida require a timely detection of the spine defect. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ratio between brain stem (BS) diameter and its distance to the occipital bone (BSOB) (BS/BSOB ratio) in the detection of fetuses with open spina bifida at first trimester ultrasound. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was performed by searching seven electronic databases from their inception to February 2019 for all studies assessing the association between BS/BSOB ratio and diagnosis of spine bifida . Diagnostic accuracy of BS/BSOB ratio in prenatal diagnosis of spine bifida was assessed as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + and LR−), and area under the curve (AUC) on SROC curves. Results Four studies, including 17,598 fetuses with 23 cases of open spina bifida, were included in the meta-analysis. BS/BSOB ratio showed pooled sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.47–0.87; I 2  = 78.3%), specificity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.99–1.0; I 2  = 99.2%), LR + and LR− of 51.44 (95% CI 9.53–277.64; I 2  = 85.5%) and 0.23 (95% CI 0.04–1.17; I 2  = 64.8%), respectively, and an AUC of 0.9649. Conclusion First trimester BS/BSOB ratio has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting fetuses with open spina bifida.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05422-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31875250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Brain Stem - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Stem - embryology ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Fetus ; Fetuses ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology ; Health risk assessment ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meningomyelocele ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Occipital Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Occipital Bone - embryology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Prenatal Care ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; Review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spina bifida ; Spina Bifida Cystica - diagnostic imaging ; Spinal Dysraphism - diagnostic imaging ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2020-02, Vol.301 (2), p.333-340</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9a37b3b77ed4315bb9de537cfd4bdbc63e0384700bd2ace8b84c5b84e74798783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9a37b3b77ed4315bb9de537cfd4bdbc63e0384700bd2ace8b84c5b84e74798783</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5443-2333</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sirico, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffone, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzone, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccone, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travaglino, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarno, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zullo, Fulvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria</creatorcontrib><title>First trimester detection of fetal open spina bifida using BS/BSOB ratio</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Background Despite the well-known second trimester ultrasound signs, current possibilities of in utero surgical repair of open spina bifida require a timely detection of the spine defect. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ratio between brain stem (BS) diameter and its distance to the occipital bone (BSOB) (BS/BSOB ratio) in the detection of fetuses with open spina bifida at first trimester ultrasound. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was performed by searching seven electronic databases from their inception to February 2019 for all studies assessing the association between BS/BSOB ratio and diagnosis of spine bifida . Diagnostic accuracy of BS/BSOB ratio in prenatal diagnosis of spine bifida was assessed as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + and LR−), and area under the curve (AUC) on SROC curves. Results Four studies, including 17,598 fetuses with 23 cases of open spina bifida, were included in the meta-analysis. BS/BSOB ratio showed pooled sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.47–0.87; I 2  = 78.3%), specificity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.99–1.0; I 2  = 99.2%), LR + and LR− of 51.44 (95% CI 9.53–277.64; I 2  = 85.5%) and 0.23 (95% CI 0.04–1.17; I 2  = 64.8%), respectively, and an AUC of 0.9649. Conclusion First trimester BS/BSOB ratio has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting fetuses with open spina bifida.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Brain Stem - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Stem - embryology</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetus</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meningomyelocele</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Occipital Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Occipital Bone - embryology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Spina bifida</subject><subject>Spina Bifida Cystica - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spinal Dysraphism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EoqXwAgzIEgtL6Dm242SkFQWkSh0Ks2UnlypVmhQ7GXh7XFJAYmDxWbrv_jt9hFwzuGcAauoBBIgIWBaBFHEc8RMyZoLHESjGTskYssMfEjUiF95vAVicpsk5GXGWKhlLGJPnReV8RztX7dB36GiBHeZd1Ta0LWmJnalpu8eG-n3VGGqrsioM7X3VbOhsPZ2tVzPqTOAvyVlpao9Xxzohb4vH1_lztFw9vcwfllHOleyizHBluVUKC8GZtDYrUHKVl4Wwhc0TjsBToQBsEZscU5uKXIYHlVBZqlI-IXdD7t617324We8qn2Ndmwbb3uuYc5CZSiQE9PYPum1714TrAiUzxpVgPFDxQOWu9d5hqfdBhnEfmoE-eNaDZx086y_P-jB0c4zu7Q6Ln5FvsQHgA-BDq9mg-939T-wnCm2Ghw</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Sirico, Angelo</creator><creator>Raffone, Antonio</creator><creator>Lanzone, Antonio</creator><creator>Saccone, Gabriele</creator><creator>Travaglino, Antonio</creator><creator>Sarno, Laura</creator><creator>Rizzo, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Zullo, Fulvio</creator><creator>Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-2333</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>First trimester detection of fetal open spina bifida using BS/BSOB ratio</title><author>Sirico, Angelo ; Raffone, Antonio ; Lanzone, Antonio ; Saccone, Gabriele ; Travaglino, Antonio ; Sarno, Laura ; Rizzo, Giuseppe ; Zullo, Fulvio ; Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9a37b3b77ed4315bb9de537cfd4bdbc63e0384700bd2ace8b84c5b84e74798783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Brain Stem - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Stem - embryology</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetus</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meningomyelocele</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Occipital Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Occipital Bone - embryology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Spina bifida</topic><topic>Spina Bifida Cystica - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spinal Dysraphism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sirico, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffone, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzone, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccone, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travaglino, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarno, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zullo, Fulvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sirico, Angelo</au><au>Raffone, Antonio</au><au>Lanzone, Antonio</au><au>Saccone, Gabriele</au><au>Travaglino, Antonio</au><au>Sarno, Laura</au><au>Rizzo, Giuseppe</au><au>Zullo, Fulvio</au><au>Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>First trimester detection of fetal open spina bifida using BS/BSOB ratio</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>301</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>333-340</pages><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Background Despite the well-known second trimester ultrasound signs, current possibilities of in utero surgical repair of open spina bifida require a timely detection of the spine defect. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ratio between brain stem (BS) diameter and its distance to the occipital bone (BSOB) (BS/BSOB ratio) in the detection of fetuses with open spina bifida at first trimester ultrasound. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was performed by searching seven electronic databases from their inception to February 2019 for all studies assessing the association between BS/BSOB ratio and diagnosis of spine bifida . Diagnostic accuracy of BS/BSOB ratio in prenatal diagnosis of spine bifida was assessed as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + and LR−), and area under the curve (AUC) on SROC curves. Results Four studies, including 17,598 fetuses with 23 cases of open spina bifida, were included in the meta-analysis. BS/BSOB ratio showed pooled sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.47–0.87; I 2  = 78.3%), specificity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.99–1.0; I 2  = 99.2%), LR + and LR− of 51.44 (95% CI 9.53–277.64; I 2  = 85.5%) and 0.23 (95% CI 0.04–1.17; I 2  = 64.8%), respectively, and an AUC of 0.9649. Conclusion First trimester BS/BSOB ratio has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting fetuses with open spina bifida.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31875250</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-019-05422-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-2333</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0932-0067
ispartof Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2020-02, Vol.301 (2), p.333-340
issn 0932-0067
1432-0711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330597650
source Springer Nature
subjects Accuracy
Brain Stem - diagnostic imaging
Brain Stem - embryology
Endocrinology
Female
Fetus
Fetuses
Gestational Age
Gynecology
Health risk assessment
Human Genetics
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meningomyelocele
Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
Occipital Bone - diagnostic imaging
Occipital Bone - embryology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Prenatal Care
Prenatal Diagnosis - methods
Review
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spina bifida
Spina Bifida Cystica - diagnostic imaging
Spinal Dysraphism - diagnostic imaging
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods
title First trimester detection of fetal open spina bifida using BS/BSOB ratio
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A07%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=First%20trimester%20detection%20of%20fetal%20open%20spina%20bifida%20using%20BS/BSOB%20ratio&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Sirico,%20Angelo&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=301&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=333-340&rft.issn=0932-0067&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-019-05422-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2359137413%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9a37b3b77ed4315bb9de537cfd4bdbc63e0384700bd2ace8b84c5b84e74798783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2359137413&rft_id=info:pmid/31875250&rfr_iscdi=true