Effect of changing the analyzed image contrast on the accuracy of intracranial volume extraction using Brain Extraction Tool 2

• Published in: Radiological physics and technology 2020-03, Vol.13 (1), p.76-82
• Main Authors: Goto, Masami, Hagiwara, Akifumi, Kato, Ayumi, Fujita, Shohei, Hori, Masaaki, Kamagata, Koji, Aoki, Shigeki, Abe, Osamu, Sakamoto, Hajime, Sakano, Yasuaki, Kyogoku, Shinsuke, Daida, Hiroyuki
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Brain; Brain - diagnostic imaging; Brain Mapping - methods; Child; Child, Preschool; Contrast Media - pharmacology; False Positive Reactions; Female; Humans; Image contrast; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Imaging; Infant; Infants; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Medical and Radiation Physics; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nuclear Medicine; Pattern Recognition, Automated; Post-processing; Proton density (concentration); Radiology; Radiotherapy; Reproducibility of Results; Software; Statistical analysis; Sturge-Weber Syndrome - diagnostic imaging; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1865-0333; 1865-0341
• DOI: 10.1007/s12194-019-00551-5

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of changing the contrast of an analyzed image on the accuracy of intracranial volume (ICV) extraction using the Brain Extraction Tool (BET2) in healthy adults and patients with Sturge–Weber syndrome (SWS), including infants. Twelve SWS patients, including infants, and 12 healthy participants were imaged on a 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machine. All individuals underwent quantification of relaxation times and proton density using multi-echo acquisition of saturation recovery with turbo-spin-echo readout (QRAPMASTER). Based on the QRAPMASTER data, we created images with seven contrasts (T1-WI, T2-WI, PD-WI, T2 short-tau inversion recovery [STIR], proton density [PD] STIR, T2STIR + PDSTIR, and T1-WI + T2-WI + PD-WI) by post-processing with SyMRI software. ICVs extracted with BET2 from the FMRIB (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain) Software Library with each of the seven image contrasts were compared with manually extracted ICVs, which is the gold standard reviewed by a board-certificated neuroradiologist. Manual extraction was performed on T1-WI and T2STIR. Statistical analyses were performed with Jaccard similarity coefficients ( J ). The highest J score was found in T1-WI + T2-WI + PD-WI in all participants (0.8451); T1-WI in healthy participants (0.8984); T2STIR in participants with SWS (0.8325). Our findings suggest that T1-WI and T2STIR should be used in ICV extraction performed using BET2 on healthy participants and infants, respectively. Additionally, if the analyzed individuals include both healthy participants and infants, T1-WI + T2-WI + PD-WI should be used.