Loading…

Interrupting Sitting Time with Simple Resistance Activities Lowers Postprandial Insulinemia in Adults with Overweight or Obesity

Objective This study aimed to examine the effects on postprandial glucose and insulin responses of interrupting sitting time with brief bouts of simple resistance activities (SRAs) in adults with overweight or obesity. Methods Participants (n = 19) were recruited for a randomized crossover trial inv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Md.), 2019-09, Vol.27 (9), p.1428-1433
Main Authors: Larsen, Robyn, Ali, Hamza, Dempsey, Paddy C., Grace, Megan, Dillon, Francis, Kingwell, Bronwyn A., Cohen, Neale, Owen, Neville, Green, Daniel J., Dunstan, David W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective This study aimed to examine the effects on postprandial glucose and insulin responses of interrupting sitting time with brief bouts of simple resistance activities (SRAs) in adults with overweight or obesity. Methods Participants (n = 19) were recruited for a randomized crossover trial involving the following two 6‐hour conditions: (1) uninterrupted sitting or (2) sitting with 3‐minute bouts of SRAs (half‐squats, calf raises, gluteal contractions, and knee raises) every 30 minutes (total duration = 27 minutes). Incremental areas under the curve (iAUC) for glucose, insulin, and insulin:glucose ratio were analyzed as prespecified secondary outcomes using mixed‐effects log‐linear regression adjusted for sex, BMI, treatment order, and preprandial values. Results are reported as multiplicative change (exponentiated coefficient [EC] with 95% CI) relative to the control condition. Results Glucose iAUC during the SRA condition was not significantly different from the prolonged sitting condition (EC = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.73‐1.16; P = 0.43). However, SRAs lowered the postprandial insulin response by 26% (EC = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.64‐0.85; P 
ISSN:1930-7381
1930-739X
DOI:10.1002/oby.22554