Metal-Organic Frameworks M-MOF-74 and M-MIL-100: Comparison of Textural, Acidic, and Catalytic Properties

The impact of the metal nature and framework type on the textural, acidic, and catalytic properties of M‐MOF‐74 (M=Co, Cu, Mg, Ni) and M‐MIL‐100 (M=Al, Cr, Sc, V) materials was evaluated. Both metal–organic framework (MOF) families showed 100 % selectivity to the tetrahydropyranyl ether for all alco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ChemPlusChem (Weinheim, Germany) Germany), 2016-08, Vol.81 (8), p.828-835
Main Authors: Palomino Cabello, Carlos, Gómez-Pozuelo, Gema, Opanasenko, Maksym, Nachtigall, Petr, Čejka, Jiří
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
alcohols
heterogeneous catalysis
mesoporous materials
metal-organic frameworks
transition metals
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The impact of the metal nature and framework type on the textural, acidic, and catalytic properties of M‐MOF‐74 (M=Co, Cu, Mg, Ni) and M‐MIL‐100 (M=Al, Cr, Sc, V) materials was evaluated. Both metal–organic framework (MOF) families showed 100 % selectivity to the tetrahydropyranyl ether for all alcohols (methanol, 1‐propanol, 1‐octanol, 2‐adamantanol, 1‐octadecanol) applied. Independently of the metal employed in the synthesis of M‐MOF‐74, the conversions were lower than those obtained with M‐MIL‐100. This result can be attributed to the combination of superior textural properties, accessibility, and strength of open metal sites in M‐MIL‐100 that improve the accessibility/diffusion of reactant and products. The variation of the size and shape of the alcohols on the activity and selectivity showed that the yield of tetrahydropyranyl ether decreased with increase of the alcohol size (methanol
ISSN:2192-6506
2192-6506
DOI:10.1002/cplu.201600168