Loading…

Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems

Abstract Background The prognostic values of the AJCC staging system for gastric cancer (GC-AJCC), the AJCC staging system for gastric neuroendocrine tumours (NET-AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine car...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of surgery 2020-02, Vol.107 (3), p.248-257
Main Authors: Lu, J, Zhao, Y J, Zhou, Y, He, Q, Tian, Y, Hao, H, Qiu, X, Jiang, L, Zhao, G, Huang, C-M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3488-7f32b50a5aaae7500447a69afd3a78deb91d2777f5f8530602dd610e93752deb3
cites
container_end_page 257
container_issue 3
container_start_page 248
container_title British journal of surgery
container_volume 107
creator Lu, J
Zhao, Y J
Zhou, Y
He, Q
Tian, Y
Hao, H
Qiu, X
Jiang, L
Zhao, G
Huang, C-M
description Abstract Background The prognostic values of the AJCC staging system for gastric cancer (GC-AJCC), the AJCC staging system for gastric neuroendocrine tumours (NET-AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MA)NEC remain controversial. Methods Data on patients with (MA)NEC from 21 centres in China were analysed. Different staging systems were evaluated by performing Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and calculating the concordance index (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Based on three existing systems, a modified staging system (mTNM) was developed. Results A total of 871 patients were included. In the GC-AJCC system, an overlap was noticed for pT2 and pT3 categories. Patients with stage IIIC disease had a similar prognosis to those with stage IV disease. The pT categories of the NET-AJCC system had a lower C-index and higher AIC than those of the other systems. In the ENETS system, there was a low proportion (0·2 per cent) of patients with stage IIIA and a high proportion (67·6 per cent) of stage IIIB disease. The mTNM system adopted the NET-AJCC pT and GC-AJCC pN and pM definitions, and was developed based on the ENETS stage definitions. The proportion of patients in each stage was better distributed and the mTNM system showed improved prognostic performance in predicting overall and disease-free survival. Conclusion The mTNM system offers more accurate prognostic value for gastric (MA)NEC than the AJCC or ENETS staging systems. Graphical Abstract The prognostic value of different staging systems in patients with gastric neuroendocrine and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MA)NEC remains controversial. A modified staging system was established, which was found to be more suitable for gastric (MA)NEC than AJCC systems and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging systems. However, this needs to be further verified by external data. Graphical Abstract
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bjs.11408
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2344229595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1002/bjs.11408</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2343520177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3488-7f32b50a5aaae7500447a69afd3a78deb91d2777f5f8530602dd610e93752deb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS1ERZfCgS-ALMGBS9qxHcfJsazKn6qFQ8s5msSTlVcbe7ETof0qfFq83QWJSj2Npfd7b0Z-jL0RcC4A5EW3TudClFA_YwuhKl1IUdXP2QIATCGUVKfsZUprAKFAyxfsVInGiEqaBft9G6wbHFmeJlw5v-JplyYa-RAiX2Gaouu5pzkG8jb00XniPcbe-TAi7zBlZ_D8cqQMoufXwfmJL8M4umki2mtL9D1Fjt7yq5yzpYx9-z_xfh7zurvQO5p2xwvSK3Yy4CbR6-M8Yz8-Xd0vvxQ33z9_XV7eFL0q67owg5KdBtSISEYDlKXBqsHBKjS1pa4RVhpjBj3UWkEF0tpKADXKaJlldcY-HHK3MfycKU3t6FJPmw16CnNqpSpLKRvd6Iy-e4Suwxx9vm5PKS1BGJOpt0dq7kay7Ta6EeOu_fvrGbg4AL_chnb_dAHtvs4219k-1Nl-vL57eGTH-4MjzNunefUH1jufgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2343520177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Lu, J ; Zhao, Y J ; Zhou, Y ; He, Q ; Tian, Y ; Hao, H ; Qiu, X ; Jiang, L ; Zhao, G ; Huang, C-M</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, J ; Zhao, Y J ; Zhou, Y ; He, Q ; Tian, Y ; Hao, H ; Qiu, X ; Jiang, L ; Zhao, G ; Huang, C-M ; on behalf of the Study Group for Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumours</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The prognostic values of the AJCC staging system for gastric cancer (GC-AJCC), the AJCC staging system for gastric neuroendocrine tumours (NET-AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MA)NEC remain controversial. Methods Data on patients with (MA)NEC from 21 centres in China were analysed. Different staging systems were evaluated by performing Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and calculating the concordance index (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Based on three existing systems, a modified staging system (mTNM) was developed. Results A total of 871 patients were included. In the GC-AJCC system, an overlap was noticed for pT2 and pT3 categories. Patients with stage IIIC disease had a similar prognosis to those with stage IV disease. The pT categories of the NET-AJCC system had a lower C-index and higher AIC than those of the other systems. In the ENETS system, there was a low proportion (0·2 per cent) of patients with stage IIIA and a high proportion (67·6 per cent) of stage IIIB disease. The mTNM system adopted the NET-AJCC pT and GC-AJCC pN and pM definitions, and was developed based on the ENETS stage definitions. The proportion of patients in each stage was better distributed and the mTNM system showed improved prognostic performance in predicting overall and disease-free survival. Conclusion The mTNM system offers more accurate prognostic value for gastric (MA)NEC than the AJCC or ENETS staging systems. Graphical Abstract The prognostic value of different staging systems in patients with gastric neuroendocrine and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MA)NEC remains controversial. A modified staging system was established, which was found to be more suitable for gastric (MA)NEC than AJCC systems and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging systems. However, this needs to be further verified by external data. Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31971627</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Gastric cancer ; Medical prognosis ; Neuroendocrine tumors ; Survival analysis</subject><ispartof>British journal of surgery, 2020-02, Vol.107 (3), p.248-257</ispartof><rights>2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd 2020</rights><rights>2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3488-7f32b50a5aaae7500447a69afd3a78deb91d2777f5f8530602dd610e93752deb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31971627$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Y J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, C-M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Study Group for Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumours</creatorcontrib><title>Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems</title><title>British journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The prognostic values of the AJCC staging system for gastric cancer (GC-AJCC), the AJCC staging system for gastric neuroendocrine tumours (NET-AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MA)NEC remain controversial. Methods Data on patients with (MA)NEC from 21 centres in China were analysed. Different staging systems were evaluated by performing Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and calculating the concordance index (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Based on three existing systems, a modified staging system (mTNM) was developed. Results A total of 871 patients were included. In the GC-AJCC system, an overlap was noticed for pT2 and pT3 categories. Patients with stage IIIC disease had a similar prognosis to those with stage IV disease. The pT categories of the NET-AJCC system had a lower C-index and higher AIC than those of the other systems. In the ENETS system, there was a low proportion (0·2 per cent) of patients with stage IIIA and a high proportion (67·6 per cent) of stage IIIB disease. The mTNM system adopted the NET-AJCC pT and GC-AJCC pN and pM definitions, and was developed based on the ENETS stage definitions. The proportion of patients in each stage was better distributed and the mTNM system showed improved prognostic performance in predicting overall and disease-free survival. Conclusion The mTNM system offers more accurate prognostic value for gastric (MA)NEC than the AJCC or ENETS staging systems. Graphical Abstract The prognostic value of different staging systems in patients with gastric neuroendocrine and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MA)NEC remains controversial. A modified staging system was established, which was found to be more suitable for gastric (MA)NEC than AJCC systems and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging systems. However, this needs to be further verified by external data. Graphical Abstract</description><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine tumors</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><issn>0007-1323</issn><issn>1365-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS1ERZfCgS-ALMGBS9qxHcfJsazKn6qFQ8s5msSTlVcbe7ETof0qfFq83QWJSj2Npfd7b0Z-jL0RcC4A5EW3TudClFA_YwuhKl1IUdXP2QIATCGUVKfsZUprAKFAyxfsVInGiEqaBft9G6wbHFmeJlw5v-JplyYa-RAiX2Gaouu5pzkG8jb00XniPcbe-TAi7zBlZ_D8cqQMoufXwfmJL8M4umki2mtL9D1Fjt7yq5yzpYx9-z_xfh7zurvQO5p2xwvSK3Yy4CbR6-M8Yz8-Xd0vvxQ33z9_XV7eFL0q67owg5KdBtSISEYDlKXBqsHBKjS1pa4RVhpjBj3UWkEF0tpKADXKaJlldcY-HHK3MfycKU3t6FJPmw16CnNqpSpLKRvd6Iy-e4Suwxx9vm5PKS1BGJOpt0dq7kay7Ta6EeOu_fvrGbg4AL_chnb_dAHtvs4219k-1Nl-vL57eGTH-4MjzNunefUH1jufgQ</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Lu, J</creator><creator>Zhao, Y J</creator><creator>Zhou, Y</creator><creator>He, Q</creator><creator>Tian, Y</creator><creator>Hao, H</creator><creator>Qiu, X</creator><creator>Jiang, L</creator><creator>Zhao, G</creator><creator>Huang, C-M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems</title><author>Lu, J ; Zhao, Y J ; Zhou, Y ; He, Q ; Tian, Y ; Hao, H ; Qiu, X ; Jiang, L ; Zhao, G ; Huang, C-M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3488-7f32b50a5aaae7500447a69afd3a78deb91d2777f5f8530602dd610e93752deb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine tumors</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Y J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, C-M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Study Group for Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumours</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, J</au><au>Zhao, Y J</au><au>Zhou, Y</au><au>He, Q</au><au>Tian, Y</au><au>Hao, H</au><au>Qiu, X</au><au>Jiang, L</au><au>Zhao, G</au><au>Huang, C-M</au><aucorp>on behalf of the Study Group for Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumours</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems</atitle><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>248-257</pages><issn>0007-1323</issn><eissn>1365-2168</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The prognostic values of the AJCC staging system for gastric cancer (GC-AJCC), the AJCC staging system for gastric neuroendocrine tumours (NET-AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MA)NEC remain controversial. Methods Data on patients with (MA)NEC from 21 centres in China were analysed. Different staging systems were evaluated by performing Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and calculating the concordance index (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Based on three existing systems, a modified staging system (mTNM) was developed. Results A total of 871 patients were included. In the GC-AJCC system, an overlap was noticed for pT2 and pT3 categories. Patients with stage IIIC disease had a similar prognosis to those with stage IV disease. The pT categories of the NET-AJCC system had a lower C-index and higher AIC than those of the other systems. In the ENETS system, there was a low proportion (0·2 per cent) of patients with stage IIIA and a high proportion (67·6 per cent) of stage IIIB disease. The mTNM system adopted the NET-AJCC pT and GC-AJCC pN and pM definitions, and was developed based on the ENETS stage definitions. The proportion of patients in each stage was better distributed and the mTNM system showed improved prognostic performance in predicting overall and disease-free survival. Conclusion The mTNM system offers more accurate prognostic value for gastric (MA)NEC than the AJCC or ENETS staging systems. Graphical Abstract The prognostic value of different staging systems in patients with gastric neuroendocrine and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MA)NEC remains controversial. A modified staging system was established, which was found to be more suitable for gastric (MA)NEC than AJCC systems and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging systems. However, this needs to be further verified by external data. Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31971627</pmid><doi>10.1002/bjs.11408</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1323
ispartof British journal of surgery, 2020-02, Vol.107 (3), p.248-257
issn 0007-1323
1365-2168
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2344229595
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Gastric cancer
Medical prognosis
Neuroendocrine tumors
Survival analysis
title Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A57%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modified%20staging%20system%20for%20gastric%20neuroendocrine%20carcinoma%20based%20on%20American%20Joint%20Committee%20on%20Cancer%20and%20European%20Neuroendocrine%20Tumor%20Society%20systems&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Lu,%20J&rft.aucorp=on%20behalf%20of%20the%20Study%20Group%20for%20Gastric%20Neuroendocrine%20Tumours&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=248-257&rft.issn=0007-1323&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bjs.11408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2343520177%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3488-7f32b50a5aaae7500447a69afd3a78deb91d2777f5f8530602dd610e93752deb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2343520177&rft_id=info:pmid/31971627&rft_oup_id=10.1002/bjs.11408&rfr_iscdi=true