Prone single-position extreme lateral interbody fusion (Pro-XLIF): preliminary results

• Published in: European spine journal 2020-02, Vol.29 (Suppl 1), p.6-13
• Main Authors: Lamartina, Claudio, Berjano, Pedro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Humans; Ideas and Technical Innovations; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurosurgery; Pain; Patient Positioning; Patients; Pilot Projects; Postoperative Complications; Prone Position - physiology; Prospective Studies; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects; Spinal Fusion - methods; Spine (lumbar); Surgery; Surgical Orthopedics; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0940-6719; 1432-0932
• DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06303-z

Background Single-position options for combined anterior and posterior fusion in the lumbar spine have been suggested to reduce the surgical time and improve the efficiency of operating room. Previous reports have focused on lateral decubitus single-position surgery. The goal of this study is to describe and evaluate the feasibility and safety of prone single-position extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) with posterior fixation. Methods Design Pilot prospective non-randomized controlled study. Seven patients who underwent prone single-position XLIF and posterior fixation were evaluated (Pro-XLIF). A control group (Std-XLIF) was composed of ten patients who underwent XLIF in lateral decubitus and posterior fixation in prone position. All patients underwent interbody XLIF fusion at one level and posterior procedures at one or more levels. Duration of surgery, blood loss, complications, X-ray use and clinical outcomes were recorded. Results No major complications were observed in either group. Oswestry Disability Index, back pain and leg pain were improved in the Pro-XLIF group from 48.5, 7.7 and 8.5 to 14.5, 1.71 and 2.71, respectively, and in the Std-XLIF group from 50.8, 5.7 and 7.2 to 22.5, 3.7 and 2.5. The Pro-XLIF group had a longer time of preparation before incision (39 vs 26 min, ns), equal duration of the anterior procedure (65 vs 59 min, ns), shorter duration of surgery (133 vs 182 min, ns) and longer X-ray exposure time (102 vs 92 s, ns). The surgical technique is described. Conclusions Prone single-position XLIF is feasible and safe. In this preliminary report, the results are comparable to the standard technique. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.