Subjective experience of paranoid ideation in a virtual reality social environment: A mixed methods cross‐sectional study

• Published in: Clinical psychology and psychotherapy 2020-05, Vol.27 (3), p.337-345
• Main Authors: Riches, Simon, Bird, Leanne, Chan, Narelle, Garety, Philippa, Rus‐Calafell, Mar, Valmaggia, Lucia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Cognitive ability; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - methods; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis; Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology; Cognitive Dysfunction - therapy; Computer applications; Cross-Sectional Studies; Culture; Delusions - diagnosis; Delusions - psychology; Delusions - therapy; Female; Humans; Interpersonal Relations; Male; Mixed methods research; Paranoia; Paranoid Disorders - diagnosis; Paranoid Disorders - psychology; Paranoid Disorders - therapy; paranoid ideation; Personality Assessment; Psychological Distance; Psychological Tests; psychosis; Qualitative research; Social Adjustment; Social Environment; Social Identification; social performance; Social Skills; Virtual reality; Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy - methods
• ISSN: 1063-3995; 1099-0879
• DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2431

Virtual reality‐assisted cognitive‐behavioural therapy (VR‐CBT) has potential to support people who experience paranoid ideation in social settings. However, virtual reality (VR) research using overt social environments is limited, and lack of qualitative studies on paranoid ideation in VR restricts understanding. This study aimed to use predominantly qualitative methods to investigate subjective experience of paranoia in VR and identify target domains for VR‐CBT. Participants (N = 36) were non‐clinical adults with high trait paranoia, who entered an interactive VR bar‐room environment. After VR, they participated in brief audiotaped semi‐structured interviews designed for measuring persecutory ideation in virtual environments. Researchers scored transcripts on the Comprehensive Assessment of At‐Risk Mental States Non‐Bizarre Ideas Global Rating Scale to rate the state paranoia represented by interview content. Thematic analysis of interviews employed superordinate themes of Social Evaluative Concerns, Ideas of Reference, and Ideas of Persecution to investigate participants' experience of paranoia. Mean score on the Non‐Bizarre Ideas scale was 3.06 (standard deviation 1.24, range 1–6), indicating “moderate” attenuated‐paranoid experiences. Nearly all participants reported Social Evaluative Concerns (N = 35) and Ideas of Reference (N = 32); half reported Ideas of Persecution (N = 19). Twelve subthemes were identified. Notably, participants believed they did not belong in the environment (N = 31), that they were the object of discussion (N = 20), and that they felt avatars were unfriendly (N = 27) and intentionally rejected them (N = 13). Subthemes reflect interpersonal and social processes that may constitute target areas for VR‐CBT, for example, cognitive appraisals and social skills. Identification of these domains indicates how personalized VR‐CBT may be operationalized.