Loading…

How protected classes in Medicare Part D influence U.S. drug sales, utilization, and price

When the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit was implemented in 2006, six drug classes were designated “protected classes.” Because responsibility for obtaining favorable drug prices depends on private insurers' abilities to negotiate with pharmaceutical manufacturers using the threat of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health economics 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.608-623
Main Author: Yarbrough, Courtney R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-c3e40c23ac70d866feca85878cb485120205c9d3ddd764e3fab05737b20a40693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-c3e40c23ac70d866feca85878cb485120205c9d3ddd764e3fab05737b20a40693
container_end_page 623
container_issue 5
container_start_page 608
container_title Health economics
container_volume 29
creator Yarbrough, Courtney R.
description When the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit was implemented in 2006, six drug classes were designated “protected classes.” Because responsibility for obtaining favorable drug prices depends on private insurers' abilities to negotiate with pharmaceutical manufacturers using the threat of formulary exclusion, the protected class designation could undermine the insurers' ability to control spending and utilization of drugs in these six classes. I estimate the effect of the protected class policy on U.S. national drug sales, utilization, and price using 2001–2010 IMS Health National Sales Perspectives data and Verispan Vector One: National data and controlling for drug and year fixed effects. I find that protected status beginning in 2006 led to $112–121 million per drug per year higher U.S. sales for drugs in protected classes relative to unprotected drugs. Greater sales were driven by the antidepressant, antipsychotic, anticonvulsant, and antineoplastic classes. Subsequent analyses on a subset of drugs reveal that increases in both price and quantity are responsible for the growth of sales in protected class drugs. These results are important for informing the recent and ongoing deliberation by the Medicare program over whether to remove several classes from protection.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hec.4006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352049905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2385112279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-c3e40c23ac70d866feca85878cb485120205c9d3ddd764e3fab05737b20a40693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMobk7BXyABLx7W-TVp0_YoczphoqC7eAlp8lUzulabljF_vZlTEcFLEpKHJ9_7EnIcwigEYOcvqEcRgNgh_RCyLAghht3NOU6CjHHokQPnFgD-DcQ-6XEGLIm46JOnab2ir03dom7RUF0q59BRW9FbNFarBum9alp66a-KssNKI52PHkbUNN0zdapEN6Rda0v7rlpbV0OqKuOFVuMh2StU6fDoax-Q-dXkcTwNZnfXN-OLWaB5yoRfMQLNuNIJmFSIArVK4zRJdR6lcegnhVhnhhtjEhEhL1TuY_EkZ6AiEBkfkLOt18d469C1cmmdxrJUFdadk4zHDCKfPPbo6R90UXdN5afzlP8sZCz5JdRN7VyDhfR5lqpZyxDkpm_p-5abvj168iXs8iWaH_C7YA8EW2BlS1z_K5LTyfhT-AFimYZc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2385112279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How protected classes in Medicare Part D influence U.S. drug sales, utilization, and price</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Yarbrough, Courtney R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yarbrough, Courtney R.</creatorcontrib><description>When the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit was implemented in 2006, six drug classes were designated “protected classes.” Because responsibility for obtaining favorable drug prices depends on private insurers' abilities to negotiate with pharmaceutical manufacturers using the threat of formulary exclusion, the protected class designation could undermine the insurers' ability to control spending and utilization of drugs in these six classes. I estimate the effect of the protected class policy on U.S. national drug sales, utilization, and price using 2001–2010 IMS Health National Sales Perspectives data and Verispan Vector One: National data and controlling for drug and year fixed effects. I find that protected status beginning in 2006 led to $112–121 million per drug per year higher U.S. sales for drugs in protected classes relative to unprotected drugs. Greater sales were driven by the antidepressant, antipsychotic, anticonvulsant, and antineoplastic classes. Subsequent analyses on a subset of drugs reveal that increases in both price and quantity are responsible for the growth of sales in protected class drugs. These results are important for informing the recent and ongoing deliberation by the Medicare program over whether to remove several classes from protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.4006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32027436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Anticonvulsants ; Antidepressants ; drug price ; Drug prices ; Health economics ; Medicare ; Medicare Part D ; Pharmaceutical industry ; pharmaceuticals ; Pharmacists ; Pharmacy benefit management ; Prescription drugs ; Prices ; protected class ; Sales</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.608-623</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-c3e40c23ac70d866feca85878cb485120205c9d3ddd764e3fab05737b20a40693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-c3e40c23ac70d866feca85878cb485120205c9d3ddd764e3fab05737b20a40693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4216-931X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32027436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yarbrough, Courtney R.</creatorcontrib><title>How protected classes in Medicare Part D influence U.S. drug sales, utilization, and price</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>When the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit was implemented in 2006, six drug classes were designated “protected classes.” Because responsibility for obtaining favorable drug prices depends on private insurers' abilities to negotiate with pharmaceutical manufacturers using the threat of formulary exclusion, the protected class designation could undermine the insurers' ability to control spending and utilization of drugs in these six classes. I estimate the effect of the protected class policy on U.S. national drug sales, utilization, and price using 2001–2010 IMS Health National Sales Perspectives data and Verispan Vector One: National data and controlling for drug and year fixed effects. I find that protected status beginning in 2006 led to $112–121 million per drug per year higher U.S. sales for drugs in protected classes relative to unprotected drugs. Greater sales were driven by the antidepressant, antipsychotic, anticonvulsant, and antineoplastic classes. Subsequent analyses on a subset of drugs reveal that increases in both price and quantity are responsible for the growth of sales in protected class drugs. These results are important for informing the recent and ongoing deliberation by the Medicare program over whether to remove several classes from protection.</description><subject>Anticonvulsants</subject><subject>Antidepressants</subject><subject>drug price</subject><subject>Drug prices</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare Part D</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Pharmacy benefit management</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>protected class</subject><subject>Sales</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMobk7BXyABLx7W-TVp0_YoczphoqC7eAlp8lUzulabljF_vZlTEcFLEpKHJ9_7EnIcwigEYOcvqEcRgNgh_RCyLAghht3NOU6CjHHokQPnFgD-DcQ-6XEGLIm46JOnab2ir03dom7RUF0q59BRW9FbNFarBum9alp66a-KssNKI52PHkbUNN0zdapEN6Rda0v7rlpbV0OqKuOFVuMh2StU6fDoax-Q-dXkcTwNZnfXN-OLWaB5yoRfMQLNuNIJmFSIArVK4zRJdR6lcegnhVhnhhtjEhEhL1TuY_EkZ6AiEBkfkLOt18d469C1cmmdxrJUFdadk4zHDCKfPPbo6R90UXdN5afzlP8sZCz5JdRN7VyDhfR5lqpZyxDkpm_p-5abvj168iXs8iWaH_C7YA8EW2BlS1z_K5LTyfhT-AFimYZc</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Yarbrough, Courtney R.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-931X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>How protected classes in Medicare Part D influence U.S. drug sales, utilization, and price</title><author>Yarbrough, Courtney R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-c3e40c23ac70d866feca85878cb485120205c9d3ddd764e3fab05737b20a40693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anticonvulsants</topic><topic>Antidepressants</topic><topic>drug price</topic><topic>Drug prices</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare Part D</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Pharmacy benefit management</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>protected class</topic><topic>Sales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yarbrough, Courtney R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yarbrough, Courtney R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How protected classes in Medicare Part D influence U.S. drug sales, utilization, and price</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>608</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>608-623</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>When the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit was implemented in 2006, six drug classes were designated “protected classes.” Because responsibility for obtaining favorable drug prices depends on private insurers' abilities to negotiate with pharmaceutical manufacturers using the threat of formulary exclusion, the protected class designation could undermine the insurers' ability to control spending and utilization of drugs in these six classes. I estimate the effect of the protected class policy on U.S. national drug sales, utilization, and price using 2001–2010 IMS Health National Sales Perspectives data and Verispan Vector One: National data and controlling for drug and year fixed effects. I find that protected status beginning in 2006 led to $112–121 million per drug per year higher U.S. sales for drugs in protected classes relative to unprotected drugs. Greater sales were driven by the antidepressant, antipsychotic, anticonvulsant, and antineoplastic classes. Subsequent analyses on a subset of drugs reveal that increases in both price and quantity are responsible for the growth of sales in protected class drugs. These results are important for informing the recent and ongoing deliberation by the Medicare program over whether to remove several classes from protection.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>32027436</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.4006</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-931X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9230
ispartof Health economics, 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.608-623
issn 1057-9230
1099-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2352049905
source EconLit s plnými texty; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley
subjects Anticonvulsants
Antidepressants
drug price
Drug prices
Health economics
Medicare
Medicare Part D
Pharmaceutical industry
pharmaceuticals
Pharmacists
Pharmacy benefit management
Prescription drugs
Prices
protected class
Sales
title How protected classes in Medicare Part D influence U.S. drug sales, utilization, and price
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A13%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20protected%20classes%20in%20Medicare%20Part%20D%20influence%20U.S.%20drug%20sales,%20utilization,%20and%20price&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Yarbrough,%20Courtney%20R.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=608&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=608-623&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.4006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2385112279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-c3e40c23ac70d866feca85878cb485120205c9d3ddd764e3fab05737b20a40693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2385112279&rft_id=info:pmid/32027436&rfr_iscdi=true