Loading…
A 3‐year longitudinal prospective study assessing microbial profile and clinical outcomes of single‐unit cement‐retained implant restorations: Zirconia versus titanium abutments
Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the microbiological and clinical outcomes of implant‐supported restorations on zirconia or titanium abutments after 3 years in function. Materials and methods Twenty two‐part dental implants were placed in 20 healthy individuals in need of single‐tooth rep...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2020-06, Vol.22 (3), p.301-310 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
The aim of this study was to assess the microbiological and clinical outcomes of implant‐supported restorations on zirconia or titanium abutments after 3 years in function.
Materials and methods
Twenty two‐part dental implants were placed in 20 healthy individuals in need of single‐tooth replacement. Ceramic‐based reconstructions were cemented in either zirconia or titanium abutments. Clinical, radiographic, and microbiological outcomes were examined at implant loading and then yearly up to 3 years post‐loading.
Results
Cumulative survival/success implant rates were 95% after 3 years. Mean total marginal bone loss was 0.76 ± 0.21 mm for zirconia and 0.99 ± 0.41 mm for titanium, with no significant differences (P > .05). Overall, titanium and zirconia abutments presented similar values of probing depth, gingival recession, and bleeding on probing over time (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1523-0899 1708-8208 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cid.12888 |