Levels of satisfaction with rheumatoid arthritis treatment and associated alignment between physicians and patients across Latin America

• Published in: Clinical rheumatology 2020-06, Vol.39 (6), p.1813-1822
• Main Authors: Alves Pereira, Ivanio, Maldonado Cocco, José, Feijó Azevedo, Valderillo, Guerra, Generoso, Bautista-Molano, Wilson, Casasola, Julio César, Vega Morales, David, Soriano, Enrique Roberto, Gil, Diana Rocío, Zazzetti, Federico, Aldunate, Leandro, Holdsworth, Elizabeth Anita, Massey, Olivia, Lobosco, Steve, Lawson, Fabio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy; Cross-Sectional Studies; Discordance; Disease control; Enzyme inhibitors; Female; Humans; Janus kinase; Latin America; Logistic Models; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Original Article; Patient Satisfaction; Patients; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Quality of Life; Remission; Remission Induction; Rheumatoid arthritis; Rheumatology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0770-3198; 1434-9949
• DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04858-x

Introduction Discordance (misalignment) regarding treatment satisfaction may exist in real-life clinical practice between patients and their physicians. We aimed to assess physician and patient treatment satisfaction levels and associated degree of misalignment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Method A point-in-time, multinational survey of patients and physicians was conducted in Latin America from December 2014 to October 2015. Physician- and patient-reported satisfaction levels with current RA treatment, alignment levels in satisfaction perception, and factors associated with satisfaction misalignment were assessed through bivariate and logistic regression analyses. Results Participating physicians ( N  = 114) completed 555 patient record forms (PRFs); 372 patients completed self-complete questionnaires (PSC). A total of 346 physician-patient pairs were analyzed. Physicians reported satisfaction with current disease control in 270/346 (78.0%) PRFs; patients reported such satisfaction in 286/346 (82.7%) PSCs. Physician-patient alignment was observed in 78.6% of pairs. Compared with aligned patients, misaligned patients were younger, more likely to have moderate or severe disease (physician subjectively defined), deteriorating or unstable disease (physician subjectively defined), been exposed to a greater number of advanced therapy lines (biologic or Janus kinase inhibitor), greater current pain, a current acute episode, poorer health, and greater disability and impairment. Misaligned patients were less likely to be in remission. Logistic regression analysis revealed that misaligned patients were more likely to experience greater activity impairment. Conclusions High treatment satisfaction and alignment were observed among RA patients and their physicians in Latin America. Misaligned patients were more likely to report more severe disease and were less likely to be in remission. Addressing misalignment may lead to improved RA disease control. Key Points • High treatment satisfaction was observed among RA patients and their treating physicians in Latin America. • One-fifth of physician-patient pairs were misaligned in treatment satisfaction. • Patients misaligned with their physicians reported higher disease activity, lower quality of life, and greater disability than those who were aligned with their physicians. • Understanding and addressing misalignment in treatment satisfaction may improve outcomes in this patient population.