Estimation of stress distribution and risk of failure for maxillary premolar restored by occlusal veneer with different CAD/CAM materials and preparation designs

• Published in: Clinical oral investigations 2020-09, Vol.24 (9), p.3157-3167
• Main Authors: Huang, Xiao-qiong, Hong, Nan-rui, Zou, Lei-yan, Wu, Shu-yi, Li, Yan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bicuspid; Ceramics; Composite materials; Composite Resins; Computed tomography; Computer-Aided Design; Dental Porcelain; Dental Stress Analysis; Dental Veneers; Dentistry; Lithium; Mastication; Materials Testing; Mathematical models; Maxilla; Medicine; Original Article; Polymers; Premolars; Resins
• ISSN: 1432-6981; 1436-3771
• DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03190-7

Objectives To compare stress distribution and failure probability in maxillary premolars restored by simple occlusal veneer (SOV) and buccal-occlusal veneer (BOV) with 3 different CAD/CAM materials. Materials and methods A maxillary premolar was digitized by a micro-CT scanner. Three-dimensional dynamic scan data were transformed, and finite element models of 2 different models (SOV and BOV restored teeth) were designed. Three different CAD/CAM materials, including lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD) IPS e.max CAD, polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network (PICN) Vita Enamic, and resin nano-ceramic (RNC) Lava Ultimate, were designated to both veneers. Maximum principle stresses were determined by applying a 300-N axial load to the occlusal surface. Weibull analyses were performed to calculate the failure probability of the models. Results LD-restored teeth showed the highest stress in the veneer, lowest stress in substrate teeth, and lowest failure probability for the overall system; RNC-restored teeth showed the lowest stress in the veneer, highest stress in substrate teeth, and highest failure probability. No significant differences were found in the cement layer among the different models. No significant differences of stress and failure probability existed between SOV and BOV preparations. Conclusions CAD/CAM composite resin occlusal veneers bear lower maximum stress than ceramic veneers. Teeth restored by composite veneers are more prone to failure than those restored by ceramic veneers. Additional reduction of the buccal surface did not increase the stress on the occlusal veneer under axial load. Clinical relevance Both occlusal veneers could be used under physiological masticatory force. CAD/CAM glass ceramic was safer than composite resins.