Loading…
Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers
Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic sea...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2020-05, Vol.58 (4), p.385-395 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273 |
container_end_page | 395 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 385 |
container_title | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | van de Meent, M.M. Pichardo, S.E.C. Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M. van Merkesteyn, J.P.R. |
description | Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, for papers that described the treatment of DSO of the mandible. The search yielded 48 papers that applied to all inclusion criteria, resulting in 16 case reports, 13 case series, 18 retrospective clinical cohort studies, and one randomised controlled trial. Reported treatment options included different operations; the use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antiresorptive medication; conservative treatment; and hyperbaric oxygen. Surgical treatment resulted in a low success rate and was associated with higher morbidity than other treatments. Conservative treatment, and that of bisphosphonates, yielded more promising results, so conservative treatment and bisphosphonates seem to be the most promising therapeutic options. However, because of the high risk of bias, no firm conclusions can be drawn, and larger studies with clear inclusion criteria and specified endpoints are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353021479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266435620300152</els_id><sourcerecordid>2353021479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNGK1TAQhoO4uMfVJxAkl970OEnatBW8kGVXhYW90euQJlNPDk1Tk1Q5D7Dvbbpn9VIYSBi-f4b5CHnDYM-AyffH_XAMPu05cNgDK8WfkR1rBK9YX8NzsgMuZVWLRl6SlykdAaDhrHlBLgWH0u3bHXm4X7MJHmkYqXXjiBHnTHNEnX35JTqGSM0hhtmZR2BNSJOZMIbk5h80pIzBn3By2aVtSD4g9Xq2bpjwA9U0nQrhdS7xiL8c_t6gZR0mlw5o6aIXjOkVuRj1lPD103tFvt_efLv-Ut3df_56_emuMjVvctXapuZWctE3uuODBt0NchgZmk7LnnG0rZEdb6EBKSzrAZmBDbEdsoG34oq8O89dYvi5YsrKu2RwmvSMYU2Ki0YAZ3XbF1ScUVMuTRFHtUTndTwpBmrzr47q0b_a_CtgpXhJvX1asA4e7b_MX-EF-HgGsJxZdESVjMPZoHURTVY2uP8u-AML1Jps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353021479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>van de Meent, M.M. ; Pichardo, S.E.C. ; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M. ; van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>van de Meent, M.M. ; Pichardo, S.E.C. ; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M. ; van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, for papers that described the treatment of DSO of the mandible. The search yielded 48 papers that applied to all inclusion criteria, resulting in 16 case reports, 13 case series, 18 retrospective clinical cohort studies, and one randomised controlled trial. Reported treatment options included different operations; the use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antiresorptive medication; conservative treatment; and hyperbaric oxygen. Surgical treatment resulted in a low success rate and was associated with higher morbidity than other treatments. Conservative treatment, and that of bisphosphonates, yielded more promising results, so conservative treatment and bisphosphonates seem to be the most promising therapeutic options. However, because of the high risk of bias, no firm conclusions can be drawn, and larger studies with clear inclusion criteria and specified endpoints are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32035697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>bisphosphonates ; conservative therapy ; Dentistry ; Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis ; DSO ; surgery ; treatment</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2020-05, Vol.58 (4), p.385-395</ispartof><rights>2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32035697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van de Meent, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichardo, S.E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers</title><title>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, for papers that described the treatment of DSO of the mandible. The search yielded 48 papers that applied to all inclusion criteria, resulting in 16 case reports, 13 case series, 18 retrospective clinical cohort studies, and one randomised controlled trial. Reported treatment options included different operations; the use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antiresorptive medication; conservative treatment; and hyperbaric oxygen. Surgical treatment resulted in a low success rate and was associated with higher morbidity than other treatments. Conservative treatment, and that of bisphosphonates, yielded more promising results, so conservative treatment and bisphosphonates seem to be the most promising therapeutic options. However, because of the high risk of bias, no firm conclusions can be drawn, and larger studies with clear inclusion criteria and specified endpoints are needed.</description><subject>bisphosphonates</subject><subject>conservative therapy</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis</subject><subject>DSO</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>treatment</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNGK1TAQhoO4uMfVJxAkl970OEnatBW8kGVXhYW90euQJlNPDk1Tk1Q5D7Dvbbpn9VIYSBi-f4b5CHnDYM-AyffH_XAMPu05cNgDK8WfkR1rBK9YX8NzsgMuZVWLRl6SlykdAaDhrHlBLgWH0u3bHXm4X7MJHmkYqXXjiBHnTHNEnX35JTqGSM0hhtmZR2BNSJOZMIbk5h80pIzBn3By2aVtSD4g9Xq2bpjwA9U0nQrhdS7xiL8c_t6gZR0mlw5o6aIXjOkVuRj1lPD103tFvt_efLv-Ut3df_56_emuMjVvctXapuZWctE3uuODBt0NchgZmk7LnnG0rZEdb6EBKSzrAZmBDbEdsoG34oq8O89dYvi5YsrKu2RwmvSMYU2Ki0YAZ3XbF1ScUVMuTRFHtUTndTwpBmrzr47q0b_a_CtgpXhJvX1asA4e7b_MX-EF-HgGsJxZdESVjMPZoHURTVY2uP8u-AML1Jps</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>van de Meent, M.M.</creator><creator>Pichardo, S.E.C.</creator><creator>Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.</creator><creator>van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers</title><author>van de Meent, M.M. ; Pichardo, S.E.C. ; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M. ; van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>bisphosphonates</topic><topic>conservative therapy</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis</topic><topic>DSO</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van de Meent, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichardo, S.E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van de Meent, M.M.</au><au>Pichardo, S.E.C.</au><au>Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.</au><au>van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>385-395</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, for papers that described the treatment of DSO of the mandible. The search yielded 48 papers that applied to all inclusion criteria, resulting in 16 case reports, 13 case series, 18 retrospective clinical cohort studies, and one randomised controlled trial. Reported treatment options included different operations; the use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antiresorptive medication; conservative treatment; and hyperbaric oxygen. Surgical treatment resulted in a low success rate and was associated with higher morbidity than other treatments. Conservative treatment, and that of bisphosphonates, yielded more promising results, so conservative treatment and bisphosphonates seem to be the most promising therapeutic options. However, because of the high risk of bias, no firm conclusions can be drawn, and larger studies with clear inclusion criteria and specified endpoints are needed.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32035697</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.012</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4356 |
ispartof | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2020-05, Vol.58 (4), p.385-395 |
issn | 0266-4356 1532-1940 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353021479 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | bisphosphonates conservative therapy Dentistry Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis DSO surgery treatment |
title | Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A12%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20of%20different%20treatments%20for%20chronic%20diffuse%20sclerosing%20osteomyelitis%20of%20the%20mandible:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20published%20papers&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=van%20de%20Meent,%20M.M.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=385-395&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353021479%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353021479&rft_id=info:pmid/32035697&rfr_iscdi=true |