Loading…

Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers

Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic sea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2020-05, Vol.58 (4), p.385-395
Main Authors: van de Meent, M.M., Pichardo, S.E.C., Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M., van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273
container_end_page 395
container_issue 4
container_start_page 385
container_title British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 58
creator van de Meent, M.M.
Pichardo, S.E.C.
Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.
van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.
description Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, for papers that described the treatment of DSO of the mandible. The search yielded 48 papers that applied to all inclusion criteria, resulting in 16 case reports, 13 case series, 18 retrospective clinical cohort studies, and one randomised controlled trial. Reported treatment options included different operations; the use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antiresorptive medication; conservative treatment; and hyperbaric oxygen. Surgical treatment resulted in a low success rate and was associated with higher morbidity than other treatments. Conservative treatment, and that of bisphosphonates, yielded more promising results, so conservative treatment and bisphosphonates seem to be the most promising therapeutic options. However, because of the high risk of bias, no firm conclusions can be drawn, and larger studies with clear inclusion criteria and specified endpoints are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.012
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353021479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266435620300152</els_id><sourcerecordid>2353021479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNGK1TAQhoO4uMfVJxAkl970OEnatBW8kGVXhYW90euQJlNPDk1Tk1Q5D7Dvbbpn9VIYSBi-f4b5CHnDYM-AyffH_XAMPu05cNgDK8WfkR1rBK9YX8NzsgMuZVWLRl6SlykdAaDhrHlBLgWH0u3bHXm4X7MJHmkYqXXjiBHnTHNEnX35JTqGSM0hhtmZR2BNSJOZMIbk5h80pIzBn3By2aVtSD4g9Xq2bpjwA9U0nQrhdS7xiL8c_t6gZR0mlw5o6aIXjOkVuRj1lPD103tFvt_efLv-Ut3df_56_emuMjVvctXapuZWctE3uuODBt0NchgZmk7LnnG0rZEdb6EBKSzrAZmBDbEdsoG34oq8O89dYvi5YsrKu2RwmvSMYU2Ki0YAZ3XbF1ScUVMuTRFHtUTndTwpBmrzr47q0b_a_CtgpXhJvX1asA4e7b_MX-EF-HgGsJxZdESVjMPZoHURTVY2uP8u-AML1Jps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353021479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>van de Meent, M.M. ; Pichardo, S.E.C. ; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M. ; van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>van de Meent, M.M. ; Pichardo, S.E.C. ; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M. ; van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, for papers that described the treatment of DSO of the mandible. The search yielded 48 papers that applied to all inclusion criteria, resulting in 16 case reports, 13 case series, 18 retrospective clinical cohort studies, and one randomised controlled trial. Reported treatment options included different operations; the use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antiresorptive medication; conservative treatment; and hyperbaric oxygen. Surgical treatment resulted in a low success rate and was associated with higher morbidity than other treatments. Conservative treatment, and that of bisphosphonates, yielded more promising results, so conservative treatment and bisphosphonates seem to be the most promising therapeutic options. However, because of the high risk of bias, no firm conclusions can be drawn, and larger studies with clear inclusion criteria and specified endpoints are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32035697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>bisphosphonates ; conservative therapy ; Dentistry ; Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis ; DSO ; surgery ; treatment</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery, 2020-05, Vol.58 (4), p.385-395</ispartof><rights>2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32035697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van de Meent, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichardo, S.E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers</title><title>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, for papers that described the treatment of DSO of the mandible. The search yielded 48 papers that applied to all inclusion criteria, resulting in 16 case reports, 13 case series, 18 retrospective clinical cohort studies, and one randomised controlled trial. Reported treatment options included different operations; the use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antiresorptive medication; conservative treatment; and hyperbaric oxygen. Surgical treatment resulted in a low success rate and was associated with higher morbidity than other treatments. Conservative treatment, and that of bisphosphonates, yielded more promising results, so conservative treatment and bisphosphonates seem to be the most promising therapeutic options. However, because of the high risk of bias, no firm conclusions can be drawn, and larger studies with clear inclusion criteria and specified endpoints are needed.</description><subject>bisphosphonates</subject><subject>conservative therapy</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis</subject><subject>DSO</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>treatment</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNGK1TAQhoO4uMfVJxAkl970OEnatBW8kGVXhYW90euQJlNPDk1Tk1Q5D7Dvbbpn9VIYSBi-f4b5CHnDYM-AyffH_XAMPu05cNgDK8WfkR1rBK9YX8NzsgMuZVWLRl6SlykdAaDhrHlBLgWH0u3bHXm4X7MJHmkYqXXjiBHnTHNEnX35JTqGSM0hhtmZR2BNSJOZMIbk5h80pIzBn3By2aVtSD4g9Xq2bpjwA9U0nQrhdS7xiL8c_t6gZR0mlw5o6aIXjOkVuRj1lPD103tFvt_efLv-Ut3df_56_emuMjVvctXapuZWctE3uuODBt0NchgZmk7LnnG0rZEdb6EBKSzrAZmBDbEdsoG34oq8O89dYvi5YsrKu2RwmvSMYU2Ki0YAZ3XbF1ScUVMuTRFHtUTndTwpBmrzr47q0b_a_CtgpXhJvX1asA4e7b_MX-EF-HgGsJxZdESVjMPZoHURTVY2uP8u-AML1Jps</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>van de Meent, M.M.</creator><creator>Pichardo, S.E.C.</creator><creator>Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.</creator><creator>van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers</title><author>van de Meent, M.M. ; Pichardo, S.E.C. ; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M. ; van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>bisphosphonates</topic><topic>conservative therapy</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis</topic><topic>DSO</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van de Meent, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichardo, S.E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van de Meent, M.M.</au><au>Pichardo, S.E.C.</au><au>Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.</au><au>van Merkesteyn, J.P.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>385-395</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, for papers that described the treatment of DSO of the mandible. The search yielded 48 papers that applied to all inclusion criteria, resulting in 16 case reports, 13 case series, 18 retrospective clinical cohort studies, and one randomised controlled trial. Reported treatment options included different operations; the use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antiresorptive medication; conservative treatment; and hyperbaric oxygen. Surgical treatment resulted in a low success rate and was associated with higher morbidity than other treatments. Conservative treatment, and that of bisphosphonates, yielded more promising results, so conservative treatment and bisphosphonates seem to be the most promising therapeutic options. However, because of the high risk of bias, no firm conclusions can be drawn, and larger studies with clear inclusion criteria and specified endpoints are needed.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32035697</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.012</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4356
ispartof British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2020-05, Vol.58 (4), p.385-395
issn 0266-4356
1532-1940
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353021479
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects bisphosphonates
conservative therapy
Dentistry
Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis
DSO
surgery
treatment
title Outcome of different treatments for chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible: a systematic review of published papers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A12%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20of%20different%20treatments%20for%20chronic%20diffuse%20sclerosing%20osteomyelitis%20of%20the%20mandible:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20published%20papers&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=van%20de%20Meent,%20M.M.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=385-395&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353021479%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-7d542d62395a82ba0a8b6bf1ec8a6912ed7c682705063d190e1c08b6bd8e1b273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353021479&rft_id=info:pmid/32035697&rfr_iscdi=true