Loading…

Electrocardiographic morphology during left bundle branch area pacing: Characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications

Aims In this study, we investigated the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of the electrocardiographic (ECG) morphology during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which have not been systematically described. Methods Patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing underwent LBBAP a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2020-03, Vol.43 (3), p.297-307
Main Authors: Gao, Ming‐Yang, Tian, Ying, Shi, Liang, Wang, Yan‐Jiang, Xie, Bo‐Qia, Qi, Jie, Zeng, Li‐Jun, Li, Xue‐Xun, Yang, Xin‐Chun, Liu, Xing‐Peng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-78b45c9002b82a7e3d3b5c1a5346149ed537d753ee8cb80f24f0939203c47d113
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-78b45c9002b82a7e3d3b5c1a5346149ed537d753ee8cb80f24f0939203c47d113
container_end_page 307
container_issue 3
container_start_page 297
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 43
creator Gao, Ming‐Yang
Tian, Ying
Shi, Liang
Wang, Yan‐Jiang
Xie, Bo‐Qia
Qi, Jie
Zeng, Li‐Jun
Li, Xue‐Xun
Yang, Xin‐Chun
Liu, Xing‐Peng
description Aims In this study, we investigated the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of the electrocardiographic (ECG) morphology during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which have not been systematically described. Methods Patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing underwent LBBAP attempts. The ECGs of patients with confirmed left bundle branch (LBB) capture were compared with those of individuals with right bundle branch block (RBBB) on 12‐lead ECG. Intracardiac electrograms recorded during implantation were analyzed in all patients who underwent pacing. Results LBBAP was successfully achieved in 87.5% (56/64) of patients. The QRS morphologies in lead V1 during LBBAP, which typically demonstrated Qr (60.7%), qR (19.6%), rSR’ (7.1%), or QS (12.5%) patterns, differed from those of native RBBB, which featured rsR’ (57.5%), M shape (23.7%), or monophasic R patterns (18.7%). The terminal R' wave duration in lead V1 was significantly shorter during LBBAP than during native RBBB (51 ± 12 ms vs 85 ± 19 ms, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pace.13884
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353581394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353581394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-78b45c9002b82a7e3d3b5c1a5346149ed537d753ee8cb80f24f0939203c47d113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u3CAQxlHVqtkmveQBKqReoqpOwEDAvUWr7R8pUnJIzxaG8ZoIgwu2qn2DPHbYbNJDD-EyaOY334zmQ-iUknNa3sWkDZxTphR_g1ZUcFIpKpq3aEUol5ViqjlCH3K-J4RcEi7eoyNWl0iIWqGHjQczp2h0si5uk54GZ_AY0zREH7c7bJfkwhZ76GfcLcF6wF3SwQxYJ9C4zC7lb3g96KTNDMnl2Zn8FRcUkt_te0cwgw4ujyWtg8XGu-CM9tiNky-f2cWQT9C7XvsMH5_jMfr9fXO3_lld3_z4tb66rgwTkldSdVyYhpC6U7WWwCzrhKFaMH5JeQNWMGmlYADKdIr0Ne9Jw5qaMMOlpZQdo7OD7pTinwXy3I4uG_BeB4hLbmsmmFCUNbygn_9D7-OSQtmuUFLWdbmnLNSXA2VSzDlB307JjTrtWkravT_t3p_2yZ8Cf3qWXLoR7D_0xZAC0APw13nYvSLV3l6tNwfRRz8vnB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2377220067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrocardiographic morphology during left bundle branch area pacing: Characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications</title><source>SPORTDiscus database</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Gao, Ming‐Yang ; Tian, Ying ; Shi, Liang ; Wang, Yan‐Jiang ; Xie, Bo‐Qia ; Qi, Jie ; Zeng, Li‐Jun ; Li, Xue‐Xun ; Yang, Xin‐Chun ; Liu, Xing‐Peng</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ming‐Yang ; Tian, Ying ; Shi, Liang ; Wang, Yan‐Jiang ; Xie, Bo‐Qia ; Qi, Jie ; Zeng, Li‐Jun ; Li, Xue‐Xun ; Yang, Xin‐Chun ; Liu, Xing‐Peng</creatorcontrib><description>Aims In this study, we investigated the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of the electrocardiographic (ECG) morphology during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which have not been systematically described. Methods Patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing underwent LBBAP attempts. The ECGs of patients with confirmed left bundle branch (LBB) capture were compared with those of individuals with right bundle branch block (RBBB) on 12‐lead ECG. Intracardiac electrograms recorded during implantation were analyzed in all patients who underwent pacing. Results LBBAP was successfully achieved in 87.5% (56/64) of patients. The QRS morphologies in lead V1 during LBBAP, which typically demonstrated Qr (60.7%), qR (19.6%), rSR’ (7.1%), or QS (12.5%) patterns, differed from those of native RBBB, which featured rsR’ (57.5%), M shape (23.7%), or monophasic R patterns (18.7%). The terminal R' wave duration in lead V1 was significantly shorter during LBBAP than during native RBBB (51 ± 12 ms vs 85 ± 19 ms, p &lt; 0.001). LBB potentials were recorded in 66.1% (37/56) of the LBBAP patients. No significant differences in ECG characteristics were found between LBBAP with and without recorded LBB potentials. The presence of bundle branch block during LBBAP significantly prolonged QRS duration, R wave peak time, and terminal R’ wave duration in lead V1. Conclusion LBBAP‐ECG patterns are characterized by a shorter terminal R’ wave duration in lead V1 compared with that of native RBBB configurations. Bundle branch conduction integrity has an impact on ECG characteristics during LBBAP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pace.13884</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32045008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology ; Bundle-Branch Block - therapy ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial ; Conduction ; Electrocardiogram ; electrocardiographic morphology ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Humans ; left bundle branch area pacing ; Male ; Morphology ; physiological pacing ; Prospective Studies ; right bundle branch block</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2020-03, Vol.43 (3), p.297-307</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-78b45c9002b82a7e3d3b5c1a5346149ed537d753ee8cb80f24f0939203c47d113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-78b45c9002b82a7e3d3b5c1a5346149ed537d753ee8cb80f24f0939203c47d113</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8304-7909 ; 0000-0002-6690-1114</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32045008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ming‐Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yan‐Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Bo‐Qia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Li‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xue‐Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xin‐Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xing‐Peng</creatorcontrib><title>Electrocardiographic morphology during left bundle branch area pacing: Characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Aims In this study, we investigated the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of the electrocardiographic (ECG) morphology during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which have not been systematically described. Methods Patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing underwent LBBAP attempts. The ECGs of patients with confirmed left bundle branch (LBB) capture were compared with those of individuals with right bundle branch block (RBBB) on 12‐lead ECG. Intracardiac electrograms recorded during implantation were analyzed in all patients who underwent pacing. Results LBBAP was successfully achieved in 87.5% (56/64) of patients. The QRS morphologies in lead V1 during LBBAP, which typically demonstrated Qr (60.7%), qR (19.6%), rSR’ (7.1%), or QS (12.5%) patterns, differed from those of native RBBB, which featured rsR’ (57.5%), M shape (23.7%), or monophasic R patterns (18.7%). The terminal R' wave duration in lead V1 was significantly shorter during LBBAP than during native RBBB (51 ± 12 ms vs 85 ± 19 ms, p &lt; 0.001). LBB potentials were recorded in 66.1% (37/56) of the LBBAP patients. No significant differences in ECG characteristics were found between LBBAP with and without recorded LBB potentials. The presence of bundle branch block during LBBAP significantly prolonged QRS duration, R wave peak time, and terminal R’ wave duration in lead V1. Conclusion LBBAP‐ECG patterns are characterized by a shorter terminal R’ wave duration in lead V1 compared with that of native RBBB configurations. Bundle branch conduction integrity has an impact on ECG characteristics during LBBAP.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</subject><subject>Conduction</subject><subject>Electrocardiogram</subject><subject>electrocardiographic morphology</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>left bundle branch area pacing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>physiological pacing</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>right bundle branch block</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9u3CAQxlHVqtkmveQBKqReoqpOwEDAvUWr7R8pUnJIzxaG8ZoIgwu2qn2DPHbYbNJDD-EyaOY334zmQ-iUknNa3sWkDZxTphR_g1ZUcFIpKpq3aEUol5ViqjlCH3K-J4RcEi7eoyNWl0iIWqGHjQczp2h0si5uk54GZ_AY0zREH7c7bJfkwhZ76GfcLcF6wF3SwQxYJ9C4zC7lb3g96KTNDMnl2Zn8FRcUkt_te0cwgw4ujyWtg8XGu-CM9tiNky-f2cWQT9C7XvsMH5_jMfr9fXO3_lld3_z4tb66rgwTkldSdVyYhpC6U7WWwCzrhKFaMH5JeQNWMGmlYADKdIr0Ne9Jw5qaMMOlpZQdo7OD7pTinwXy3I4uG_BeB4hLbmsmmFCUNbygn_9D7-OSQtmuUFLWdbmnLNSXA2VSzDlB307JjTrtWkravT_t3p_2yZ8Cf3qWXLoR7D_0xZAC0APw13nYvSLV3l6tNwfRRz8vnB8</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Gao, Ming‐Yang</creator><creator>Tian, Ying</creator><creator>Shi, Liang</creator><creator>Wang, Yan‐Jiang</creator><creator>Xie, Bo‐Qia</creator><creator>Qi, Jie</creator><creator>Zeng, Li‐Jun</creator><creator>Li, Xue‐Xun</creator><creator>Yang, Xin‐Chun</creator><creator>Liu, Xing‐Peng</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-7909</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-1114</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Electrocardiographic morphology during left bundle branch area pacing: Characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications</title><author>Gao, Ming‐Yang ; Tian, Ying ; Shi, Liang ; Wang, Yan‐Jiang ; Xie, Bo‐Qia ; Qi, Jie ; Zeng, Li‐Jun ; Li, Xue‐Xun ; Yang, Xin‐Chun ; Liu, Xing‐Peng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-78b45c9002b82a7e3d3b5c1a5346149ed537d753ee8cb80f24f0939203c47d113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</topic><topic>Conduction</topic><topic>Electrocardiogram</topic><topic>electrocardiographic morphology</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>left bundle branch area pacing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>physiological pacing</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>right bundle branch block</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ming‐Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yan‐Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Bo‐Qia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Li‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xue‐Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xin‐Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xing‐Peng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Ming‐Yang</au><au>Tian, Ying</au><au>Shi, Liang</au><au>Wang, Yan‐Jiang</au><au>Xie, Bo‐Qia</au><au>Qi, Jie</au><au>Zeng, Li‐Jun</au><au>Li, Xue‐Xun</au><au>Yang, Xin‐Chun</au><au>Liu, Xing‐Peng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrocardiographic morphology during left bundle branch area pacing: Characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>297-307</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Aims In this study, we investigated the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of the electrocardiographic (ECG) morphology during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which have not been systematically described. Methods Patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing underwent LBBAP attempts. The ECGs of patients with confirmed left bundle branch (LBB) capture were compared with those of individuals with right bundle branch block (RBBB) on 12‐lead ECG. Intracardiac electrograms recorded during implantation were analyzed in all patients who underwent pacing. Results LBBAP was successfully achieved in 87.5% (56/64) of patients. The QRS morphologies in lead V1 during LBBAP, which typically demonstrated Qr (60.7%), qR (19.6%), rSR’ (7.1%), or QS (12.5%) patterns, differed from those of native RBBB, which featured rsR’ (57.5%), M shape (23.7%), or monophasic R patterns (18.7%). The terminal R' wave duration in lead V1 was significantly shorter during LBBAP than during native RBBB (51 ± 12 ms vs 85 ± 19 ms, p &lt; 0.001). LBB potentials were recorded in 66.1% (37/56) of the LBBAP patients. No significant differences in ECG characteristics were found between LBBAP with and without recorded LBB potentials. The presence of bundle branch block during LBBAP significantly prolonged QRS duration, R wave peak time, and terminal R’ wave duration in lead V1. Conclusion LBBAP‐ECG patterns are characterized by a shorter terminal R’ wave duration in lead V1 compared with that of native RBBB configurations. Bundle branch conduction integrity has an impact on ECG characteristics during LBBAP.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32045008</pmid><doi>10.1111/pace.13884</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-7909</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-1114</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2020-03, Vol.43 (3), p.297-307
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2353581394
source SPORTDiscus database; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Aged
Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology
Bundle-Branch Block - therapy
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
Conduction
Electrocardiogram
electrocardiographic morphology
Electrocardiography
Female
Humans
left bundle branch area pacing
Male
Morphology
physiological pacing
Prospective Studies
right bundle branch block
title Electrocardiographic morphology during left bundle branch area pacing: Characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A00%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrocardiographic%20morphology%20during%20left%20bundle%20branch%20area%20pacing:%20Characteristics,%20underlying%20mechanisms,%20and%20clinical%20implications&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Gao,%20Ming%E2%80%90Yang&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=297-307&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pace.13884&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353581394%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-78b45c9002b82a7e3d3b5c1a5346149ed537d753ee8cb80f24f0939203c47d113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2377220067&rft_id=info:pmid/32045008&rfr_iscdi=true