Loading…
Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery does not decrease postoperative stroke rates
AbstractObjectiveThe timing of operative revascularization for patients with concomitant carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease remains controversial. We examined the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to evaluate the association of combined carotid endart...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2020-08, Vol.72 (2), p.589-596.e3 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d052962752d80bc516c1ceac124d1595dd753469f3a13598814bef43c04505083 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d052962752d80bc516c1ceac124d1595dd753469f3a13598814bef43c04505083 |
container_end_page | 596.e3 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 589 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Klarin, Derek, MD Patel, Virendra I., MD, MPH Zhang, Shuaiqi, MS Xian, Ying, MD, PhD Kosinski, Andrzej, PhD Yerokun, Babatunde, MD Badhwar, Vinay, MD Thourani, Vinod H., MD Sundt, Thoralf M., MD Shahian, David, MD Melnitchouk, Serguei, MD |
description | AbstractObjectiveThe timing of operative revascularization for patients with concomitant carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease remains controversial. We examined the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to evaluate the association of combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with postoperative outcomes. MethodsAll patients undergoing CABG with known carotid stenosis of >80% were identified from 2011 to 2016. Individuals were stratified by use of cardiopulmonary bypass and whether a concomitant CEA was performed at the time of CABG. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the probability of combined CABG and CEA. The resulting propensity scores were used to match individuals on the basis of clinical and operative characteristics to evaluate primary (30-day mortality and in-hospital transient ischemic attack and stroke) and secondary (STS morbidity composite events and length of stay) end points, with P < .05 required to declare statistical significance. ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 994 off-pump CABG patients (497 CABG only and 497 CABG-CEA) and 5952 on-pump CABG patients (2976 CABG only and 2976 CABG-CEA) were identified. For patients who received on-pump operations, those undergoing CABG-CEA had no observed difference in rate of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.21; P = .6), higher incidence of STS morbidity composite events (OR, 1.15, 95% CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03), longer length of stay (7.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days vs 6.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days; P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.072 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2357469392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0741521419325911</els_id><sourcerecordid>2357469392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d052962752d80bc516c1ceac124d1595dd753469f3a13598814bef43c04505083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGLFDEQhYO4uOPqD_AiOXrpMZV0Oh0EQQZXhQUPq-eQSWokvd2dMUkPzL83zex68OCpqKr3HtRXhLwBtgUG3fthO5zyljPQtd8yxZ-RDTCtmq5n-jnZMNVCIzm01-RlzgNjALJXL8i14KxTveo2xO3i7OIUip0LdTbFEjzF2dtUMKErcTpTO_t15YN1NC_pF6Yz9REznWOhHl1Cm5EeYy7xiMmWcEKaS4oPSGuH-RW5Otgx4-vHekN-3n7-sfva3H3_8m336a5xrYTSeCa57riS3Pds7yR0DhxaB7z1ILX0XknRdvogLAip-x7aPR5a4VgrmWS9uCHvLrnHFH8vmIuZQnY4jnbGuGTDhVTVLzSvUrhIXYo5JzyYYwqTTWcDzKxszWAqW7OyXUeVbfW8fYxf9hP6v44nmFXw4SLAeuQpYDLZBZwd-rCiND6G_8Z__MftxjAHZ8cHPGMe4pLmSs-Aydwwc78-d_0taMGlBhB_AHban5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2357469392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery does not decrease postoperative stroke rates</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Klarin, Derek, MD ; Patel, Virendra I., MD, MPH ; Zhang, Shuaiqi, MS ; Xian, Ying, MD, PhD ; Kosinski, Andrzej, PhD ; Yerokun, Babatunde, MD ; Badhwar, Vinay, MD ; Thourani, Vinod H., MD ; Sundt, Thoralf M., MD ; Shahian, David, MD ; Melnitchouk, Serguei, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Klarin, Derek, MD ; Patel, Virendra I., MD, MPH ; Zhang, Shuaiqi, MS ; Xian, Ying, MD, PhD ; Kosinski, Andrzej, PhD ; Yerokun, Babatunde, MD ; Badhwar, Vinay, MD ; Thourani, Vinod H., MD ; Sundt, Thoralf M., MD ; Shahian, David, MD ; Melnitchouk, Serguei, MD</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractObjectiveThe timing of operative revascularization for patients with concomitant carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease remains controversial. We examined the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to evaluate the association of combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with postoperative outcomes. MethodsAll patients undergoing CABG with known carotid stenosis of >80% were identified from 2011 to 2016. Individuals were stratified by use of cardiopulmonary bypass and whether a concomitant CEA was performed at the time of CABG. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the probability of combined CABG and CEA. The resulting propensity scores were used to match individuals on the basis of clinical and operative characteristics to evaluate primary (30-day mortality and in-hospital transient ischemic attack and stroke) and secondary (STS morbidity composite events and length of stay) end points, with P < .05 required to declare statistical significance. ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 994 off-pump CABG patients (497 CABG only and 497 CABG-CEA) and 5952 on-pump CABG patients (2976 CABG only and 2976 CABG-CEA) were identified. For patients who received on-pump operations, those undergoing CABG-CEA had no observed difference in rate of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.21; P = .6), higher incidence of STS morbidity composite events (OR, 1.15, 95% CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03), longer length of stay (7.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days vs 6.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days; P < .005), and no observed difference in 30-day mortality (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97-1.69; P = .08) compared with those undergoing CABG only. For off-pump procedures, CABG-CEA patients had no observed difference in rate of in-hospital stroke (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.69; P = .56) compared with those undergoing CABG only. ConclusionsWhereas the differences are relatively small, these data suggest that a combined CABG-CEA approach is unlikely to provide significant stroke reduction benefit compared with CABG only. However, comparison with staged approaches merits further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32067876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; CABG ; Cardiopulmonary bypass ; Carotid endarterectomy ; Coronary artery disease ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2020-08, Vol.72 (2), p.589-596.e3</ispartof><rights>Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2019 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d052962752d80bc516c1ceac124d1595dd753469f3a13598814bef43c04505083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d052962752d80bc516c1ceac124d1595dd753469f3a13598814bef43c04505083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32067876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klarin, Derek, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Virendra I., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuaiqi, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xian, Ying, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosinski, Andrzej, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yerokun, Babatunde, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badhwar, Vinay, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thourani, Vinod H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundt, Thoralf M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahian, David, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melnitchouk, Serguei, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery does not decrease postoperative stroke rates</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>AbstractObjectiveThe timing of operative revascularization for patients with concomitant carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease remains controversial. We examined the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to evaluate the association of combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with postoperative outcomes. MethodsAll patients undergoing CABG with known carotid stenosis of >80% were identified from 2011 to 2016. Individuals were stratified by use of cardiopulmonary bypass and whether a concomitant CEA was performed at the time of CABG. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the probability of combined CABG and CEA. The resulting propensity scores were used to match individuals on the basis of clinical and operative characteristics to evaluate primary (30-day mortality and in-hospital transient ischemic attack and stroke) and secondary (STS morbidity composite events and length of stay) end points, with P < .05 required to declare statistical significance. ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 994 off-pump CABG patients (497 CABG only and 497 CABG-CEA) and 5952 on-pump CABG patients (2976 CABG only and 2976 CABG-CEA) were identified. For patients who received on-pump operations, those undergoing CABG-CEA had no observed difference in rate of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.21; P = .6), higher incidence of STS morbidity composite events (OR, 1.15, 95% CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03), longer length of stay (7.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days vs 6.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days; P < .005), and no observed difference in 30-day mortality (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97-1.69; P = .08) compared with those undergoing CABG only. For off-pump procedures, CABG-CEA patients had no observed difference in rate of in-hospital stroke (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.69; P = .56) compared with those undergoing CABG only. ConclusionsWhereas the differences are relatively small, these data suggest that a combined CABG-CEA approach is unlikely to provide significant stroke reduction benefit compared with CABG only. However, comparison with staged approaches merits further investigation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>CABG</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><subject>Carotid endarterectomy</subject><subject>Coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUGLFDEQhYO4uOPqD_AiOXrpMZV0Oh0EQQZXhQUPq-eQSWokvd2dMUkPzL83zex68OCpqKr3HtRXhLwBtgUG3fthO5zyljPQtd8yxZ-RDTCtmq5n-jnZMNVCIzm01-RlzgNjALJXL8i14KxTveo2xO3i7OIUip0LdTbFEjzF2dtUMKErcTpTO_t15YN1NC_pF6Yz9REznWOhHl1Cm5EeYy7xiMmWcEKaS4oPSGuH-RW5Otgx4-vHekN-3n7-sfva3H3_8m336a5xrYTSeCa57riS3Pds7yR0DhxaB7z1ILX0XknRdvogLAip-x7aPR5a4VgrmWS9uCHvLrnHFH8vmIuZQnY4jnbGuGTDhVTVLzSvUrhIXYo5JzyYYwqTTWcDzKxszWAqW7OyXUeVbfW8fYxf9hP6v44nmFXw4SLAeuQpYDLZBZwd-rCiND6G_8Z__MftxjAHZ8cHPGMe4pLmSs-Aydwwc78-d_0taMGlBhB_AHban5g</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Klarin, Derek, MD</creator><creator>Patel, Virendra I., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Zhang, Shuaiqi, MS</creator><creator>Xian, Ying, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kosinski, Andrzej, PhD</creator><creator>Yerokun, Babatunde, MD</creator><creator>Badhwar, Vinay, MD</creator><creator>Thourani, Vinod H., MD</creator><creator>Sundt, Thoralf M., MD</creator><creator>Shahian, David, MD</creator><creator>Melnitchouk, Serguei, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery does not decrease postoperative stroke rates</title><author>Klarin, Derek, MD ; Patel, Virendra I., MD, MPH ; Zhang, Shuaiqi, MS ; Xian, Ying, MD, PhD ; Kosinski, Andrzej, PhD ; Yerokun, Babatunde, MD ; Badhwar, Vinay, MD ; Thourani, Vinod H., MD ; Sundt, Thoralf M., MD ; Shahian, David, MD ; Melnitchouk, Serguei, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d052962752d80bc516c1ceac124d1595dd753469f3a13598814bef43c04505083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>CABG</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary bypass</topic><topic>Carotid endarterectomy</topic><topic>Coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klarin, Derek, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Virendra I., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuaiqi, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xian, Ying, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosinski, Andrzej, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yerokun, Babatunde, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badhwar, Vinay, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thourani, Vinod H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundt, Thoralf M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahian, David, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melnitchouk, Serguei, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klarin, Derek, MD</au><au>Patel, Virendra I., MD, MPH</au><au>Zhang, Shuaiqi, MS</au><au>Xian, Ying, MD, PhD</au><au>Kosinski, Andrzej, PhD</au><au>Yerokun, Babatunde, MD</au><au>Badhwar, Vinay, MD</au><au>Thourani, Vinod H., MD</au><au>Sundt, Thoralf M., MD</au><au>Shahian, David, MD</au><au>Melnitchouk, Serguei, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery does not decrease postoperative stroke rates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>589</spage><epage>596.e3</epage><pages>589-596.e3</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>AbstractObjectiveThe timing of operative revascularization for patients with concomitant carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease remains controversial. We examined the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to evaluate the association of combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with postoperative outcomes. MethodsAll patients undergoing CABG with known carotid stenosis of >80% were identified from 2011 to 2016. Individuals were stratified by use of cardiopulmonary bypass and whether a concomitant CEA was performed at the time of CABG. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the probability of combined CABG and CEA. The resulting propensity scores were used to match individuals on the basis of clinical and operative characteristics to evaluate primary (30-day mortality and in-hospital transient ischemic attack and stroke) and secondary (STS morbidity composite events and length of stay) end points, with P < .05 required to declare statistical significance. ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 994 off-pump CABG patients (497 CABG only and 497 CABG-CEA) and 5952 on-pump CABG patients (2976 CABG only and 2976 CABG-CEA) were identified. For patients who received on-pump operations, those undergoing CABG-CEA had no observed difference in rate of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.21; P = .6), higher incidence of STS morbidity composite events (OR, 1.15, 95% CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03), longer length of stay (7.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days vs 6.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days; P < .005), and no observed difference in 30-day mortality (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97-1.69; P = .08) compared with those undergoing CABG only. For off-pump procedures, CABG-CEA patients had no observed difference in rate of in-hospital stroke (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.69; P = .56) compared with those undergoing CABG only. ConclusionsWhereas the differences are relatively small, these data suggest that a combined CABG-CEA approach is unlikely to provide significant stroke reduction benefit compared with CABG only. However, comparison with staged approaches merits further investigation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32067876</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.072</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2020-08, Vol.72 (2), p.589-596.e3 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2357469392 |
source | BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS |
subjects | Adult CABG Cardiopulmonary bypass Carotid endarterectomy Coronary artery disease Surgery |
title | Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery does not decrease postoperative stroke rates |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-05T02%3A13%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concomitant%20carotid%20endarterectomy%20and%20cardiac%20surgery%20does%20not%20decrease%20postoperative%20stroke%20rates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Klarin,%20Derek,%20MD&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=589&rft.epage=596.e3&rft.pages=589-596.e3&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2357469392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d052962752d80bc516c1ceac124d1595dd753469f3a13598814bef43c04505083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2357469392&rft_id=info:pmid/32067876&rfr_iscdi=true |