Loading…

Auxiliary voltage enhanced microbial methane oxidation co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction

In this study, single-chamber bioelectrochemical reactors (EMNS) were used to investigate the methane oxidation driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction with the auxiliary voltage. Results showed that the methane oxidation was simultaneously driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction, with more methane...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemosphere (Oxford) 2020-07, Vol.250, p.126259-126259, Article 126259
Main Authors: Chai, Fengguang, Li, Lin, Xue, Song, Liu, Junxin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f125afa2d51c2cb045030637bd1cb1fdfc86bd44f3e6fbd3eb6c14bbe574928d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f125afa2d51c2cb045030637bd1cb1fdfc86bd44f3e6fbd3eb6c14bbe574928d3
container_end_page 126259
container_issue
container_start_page 126259
container_title Chemosphere (Oxford)
container_volume 250
creator Chai, Fengguang
Li, Lin
Xue, Song
Liu, Junxin
description In this study, single-chamber bioelectrochemical reactors (EMNS) were used to investigate the methane oxidation driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction with the auxiliary voltage. Results showed that the methane oxidation was simultaneously driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction, with more methane being converted using the auxiliary voltage. When the voltage was 1.6 V, the maximum removal rate was achieved at 8.05 mg L−1 d−1. Carbon dioxide and methanol were the main products of methane oxidation. Simultaneously, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, sulfur ions, and hydrogen sulfide were detected as products of sulfate and nitrite reduction. Microbial populations were analyzed by qPCR and high-throughput sequencing. The detected methanotrophs included Methylocaldum sp., Methylocystis sp., Methylobacter sp. and M. oxyfera. The highest abundance of M. oxyfera was (3.97 ± 0.32) × 106 copies L−1 in the EMNS-1.6. The dominant nitrite-reducing bacteria were Ignavibacterium sp., Hyphomicrobium sp., Alicycliphilus sp., and Anammox bacteria. Desulfovibrio sp., Desulfosporosinus sp. and Thiobacillus sp. were related to the sulfur cycle. Ignavibacterium sp., Thiobacillus sp. and Desulfovibrio sp. may transfer electrons with electrodes using humic acids as the electronic shuttle. The possible pathways included (1) Methane was mainly oxidized to carbon dioxide and dissolved organic matters by methanotrophs utilizing the oxygen produced by the disproportionation in the cells of M. oxyfera. (2) Nitrite was reduced to nitrogen by heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria with dissolved organic compounds. (3) Desulfovibrio sp. and Desulfosporosinus sp. reduced sulfate to sulfur ions. Thiobacillus sp. oxidized sulfur ions to sulfur or sulfate using nitrite as the electron acceptor. [Display omitted] •Methane oxidation can be co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction.•Auxiliary voltage plays an important role in strengthening methane oxidation.•The conversion products of methane were carbon dioxide and methanol.•The dominant methanotrophs included the M. oxyfera, Methylocystis sp., Methylobacter sp., and Methylocaldum sp..•Possible pathways were proposed for the methane oxidation coupled with nitrite and sulfate reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126259
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2364036676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653520304525</els_id><sourcerecordid>2364036676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f125afa2d51c2cb045030637bd1cb1fdfc86bd44f3e6fbd3eb6c14bbe574928d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtP6zAQRi0Egt7CX0Bmxya9fsROs0QVjyshsYG15ceYukriYicV_PvrqoBYsvJodD7PzEHoipIFJVT-3SzsGvqYt2tIsGCElT6TTLRHaEaXTVtR1i6P0YyQWlRScHGG_uS8IaSERXuKzjgjLRONmCF9M72HLuj0gXexG_UrYBjWerDgcB9siiboDvcwlh7g-B6cHkMcsI2VS2EHAzYfeAhjCiNgPTicp87rUidwk92j5-jE6y7Dxec7Ry93t8-rh-rx6f7f6uaxsrxpxspTJrTXzAlqmTVlc8KJ5I1x1BrqnbdLaVxdew7SG8fBSEtrY0A0dcuWjs_R9eHfbYpvE-RR9SFb6LqyeJyyYlzWhEvZyIK2B7Tcl3MCr7Yp9MWBokTtDauN-mFY7Q2rg-GSvfwcM5ke3HfyS2kBVgcAyrG7AEllG2AvNCSwo3Ix_GLMf95klWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2364036676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Auxiliary voltage enhanced microbial methane oxidation co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Chai, Fengguang ; Li, Lin ; Xue, Song ; Liu, Junxin</creator><creatorcontrib>Chai, Fengguang ; Li, Lin ; Xue, Song ; Liu, Junxin</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, single-chamber bioelectrochemical reactors (EMNS) were used to investigate the methane oxidation driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction with the auxiliary voltage. Results showed that the methane oxidation was simultaneously driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction, with more methane being converted using the auxiliary voltage. When the voltage was 1.6 V, the maximum removal rate was achieved at 8.05 mg L−1 d−1. Carbon dioxide and methanol were the main products of methane oxidation. Simultaneously, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, sulfur ions, and hydrogen sulfide were detected as products of sulfate and nitrite reduction. Microbial populations were analyzed by qPCR and high-throughput sequencing. The detected methanotrophs included Methylocaldum sp., Methylocystis sp., Methylobacter sp. and M. oxyfera. The highest abundance of M. oxyfera was (3.97 ± 0.32) × 106 copies L−1 in the EMNS-1.6. The dominant nitrite-reducing bacteria were Ignavibacterium sp., Hyphomicrobium sp., Alicycliphilus sp., and Anammox bacteria. Desulfovibrio sp., Desulfosporosinus sp. and Thiobacillus sp. were related to the sulfur cycle. Ignavibacterium sp., Thiobacillus sp. and Desulfovibrio sp. may transfer electrons with electrodes using humic acids as the electronic shuttle. The possible pathways included (1) Methane was mainly oxidized to carbon dioxide and dissolved organic matters by methanotrophs utilizing the oxygen produced by the disproportionation in the cells of M. oxyfera. (2) Nitrite was reduced to nitrogen by heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria with dissolved organic compounds. (3) Desulfovibrio sp. and Desulfosporosinus sp. reduced sulfate to sulfur ions. Thiobacillus sp. oxidized sulfur ions to sulfur or sulfate using nitrite as the electron acceptor. [Display omitted] •Methane oxidation can be co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction.•Auxiliary voltage plays an important role in strengthening methane oxidation.•The conversion products of methane were carbon dioxide and methanol.•The dominant methanotrophs included the M. oxyfera, Methylocystis sp., Methylobacter sp., and Methylocaldum sp..•Possible pathways were proposed for the methane oxidation coupled with nitrite and sulfate reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126259</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32092575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobiosis ; Auxiliary voltage ; Bacteria - metabolism ; Bioreactors - microbiology ; Denitrification ; Methane - metabolism ; Methane oxidation ; Microbial population ; Nitrite reduction ; Nitrites - metabolism ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Potential pathway ; Sulfate reduction ; Sulfates - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2020-07, Vol.250, p.126259-126259, Article 126259</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f125afa2d51c2cb045030637bd1cb1fdfc86bd44f3e6fbd3eb6c14bbe574928d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f125afa2d51c2cb045030637bd1cb1fdfc86bd44f3e6fbd3eb6c14bbe574928d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32092575$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chai, Fengguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Junxin</creatorcontrib><title>Auxiliary voltage enhanced microbial methane oxidation co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>In this study, single-chamber bioelectrochemical reactors (EMNS) were used to investigate the methane oxidation driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction with the auxiliary voltage. Results showed that the methane oxidation was simultaneously driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction, with more methane being converted using the auxiliary voltage. When the voltage was 1.6 V, the maximum removal rate was achieved at 8.05 mg L−1 d−1. Carbon dioxide and methanol were the main products of methane oxidation. Simultaneously, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, sulfur ions, and hydrogen sulfide were detected as products of sulfate and nitrite reduction. Microbial populations were analyzed by qPCR and high-throughput sequencing. The detected methanotrophs included Methylocaldum sp., Methylocystis sp., Methylobacter sp. and M. oxyfera. The highest abundance of M. oxyfera was (3.97 ± 0.32) × 106 copies L−1 in the EMNS-1.6. The dominant nitrite-reducing bacteria were Ignavibacterium sp., Hyphomicrobium sp., Alicycliphilus sp., and Anammox bacteria. Desulfovibrio sp., Desulfosporosinus sp. and Thiobacillus sp. were related to the sulfur cycle. Ignavibacterium sp., Thiobacillus sp. and Desulfovibrio sp. may transfer electrons with electrodes using humic acids as the electronic shuttle. The possible pathways included (1) Methane was mainly oxidized to carbon dioxide and dissolved organic matters by methanotrophs utilizing the oxygen produced by the disproportionation in the cells of M. oxyfera. (2) Nitrite was reduced to nitrogen by heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria with dissolved organic compounds. (3) Desulfovibrio sp. and Desulfosporosinus sp. reduced sulfate to sulfur ions. Thiobacillus sp. oxidized sulfur ions to sulfur or sulfate using nitrite as the electron acceptor. [Display omitted] •Methane oxidation can be co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction.•Auxiliary voltage plays an important role in strengthening methane oxidation.•The conversion products of methane were carbon dioxide and methanol.•The dominant methanotrophs included the M. oxyfera, Methylocystis sp., Methylobacter sp., and Methylocaldum sp..•Possible pathways were proposed for the methane oxidation coupled with nitrite and sulfate reduction.</description><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Auxiliary voltage</subject><subject>Bacteria - metabolism</subject><subject>Bioreactors - microbiology</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Methane - metabolism</subject><subject>Methane oxidation</subject><subject>Microbial population</subject><subject>Nitrite reduction</subject><subject>Nitrites - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Potential pathway</subject><subject>Sulfate reduction</subject><subject>Sulfates - metabolism</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtP6zAQRi0Egt7CX0Bmxya9fsROs0QVjyshsYG15ceYukriYicV_PvrqoBYsvJodD7PzEHoipIFJVT-3SzsGvqYt2tIsGCElT6TTLRHaEaXTVtR1i6P0YyQWlRScHGG_uS8IaSERXuKzjgjLRONmCF9M72HLuj0gXexG_UrYBjWerDgcB9siiboDvcwlh7g-B6cHkMcsI2VS2EHAzYfeAhjCiNgPTicp87rUidwk92j5-jE6y7Dxec7Ry93t8-rh-rx6f7f6uaxsrxpxspTJrTXzAlqmTVlc8KJ5I1x1BrqnbdLaVxdew7SG8fBSEtrY0A0dcuWjs_R9eHfbYpvE-RR9SFb6LqyeJyyYlzWhEvZyIK2B7Tcl3MCr7Yp9MWBokTtDauN-mFY7Q2rg-GSvfwcM5ke3HfyS2kBVgcAyrG7AEllG2AvNCSwo3Ix_GLMf95klWQ</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Chai, Fengguang</creator><creator>Li, Lin</creator><creator>Xue, Song</creator><creator>Liu, Junxin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Auxiliary voltage enhanced microbial methane oxidation co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction</title><author>Chai, Fengguang ; Li, Lin ; Xue, Song ; Liu, Junxin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f125afa2d51c2cb045030637bd1cb1fdfc86bd44f3e6fbd3eb6c14bbe574928d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Auxiliary voltage</topic><topic>Bacteria - metabolism</topic><topic>Bioreactors - microbiology</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Methane - metabolism</topic><topic>Methane oxidation</topic><topic>Microbial population</topic><topic>Nitrite reduction</topic><topic>Nitrites - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Potential pathway</topic><topic>Sulfate reduction</topic><topic>Sulfates - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chai, Fengguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Junxin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chai, Fengguang</au><au>Li, Lin</au><au>Xue, Song</au><au>Liu, Junxin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Auxiliary voltage enhanced microbial methane oxidation co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>250</volume><spage>126259</spage><epage>126259</epage><pages>126259-126259</pages><artnum>126259</artnum><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><abstract>In this study, single-chamber bioelectrochemical reactors (EMNS) were used to investigate the methane oxidation driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction with the auxiliary voltage. Results showed that the methane oxidation was simultaneously driven by sulfate and nitrite reduction, with more methane being converted using the auxiliary voltage. When the voltage was 1.6 V, the maximum removal rate was achieved at 8.05 mg L−1 d−1. Carbon dioxide and methanol were the main products of methane oxidation. Simultaneously, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, sulfur ions, and hydrogen sulfide were detected as products of sulfate and nitrite reduction. Microbial populations were analyzed by qPCR and high-throughput sequencing. The detected methanotrophs included Methylocaldum sp., Methylocystis sp., Methylobacter sp. and M. oxyfera. The highest abundance of M. oxyfera was (3.97 ± 0.32) × 106 copies L−1 in the EMNS-1.6. The dominant nitrite-reducing bacteria were Ignavibacterium sp., Hyphomicrobium sp., Alicycliphilus sp., and Anammox bacteria. Desulfovibrio sp., Desulfosporosinus sp. and Thiobacillus sp. were related to the sulfur cycle. Ignavibacterium sp., Thiobacillus sp. and Desulfovibrio sp. may transfer electrons with electrodes using humic acids as the electronic shuttle. The possible pathways included (1) Methane was mainly oxidized to carbon dioxide and dissolved organic matters by methanotrophs utilizing the oxygen produced by the disproportionation in the cells of M. oxyfera. (2) Nitrite was reduced to nitrogen by heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria with dissolved organic compounds. (3) Desulfovibrio sp. and Desulfosporosinus sp. reduced sulfate to sulfur ions. Thiobacillus sp. oxidized sulfur ions to sulfur or sulfate using nitrite as the electron acceptor. [Display omitted] •Methane oxidation can be co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction.•Auxiliary voltage plays an important role in strengthening methane oxidation.•The conversion products of methane were carbon dioxide and methanol.•The dominant methanotrophs included the M. oxyfera, Methylocystis sp., Methylobacter sp., and Methylocaldum sp..•Possible pathways were proposed for the methane oxidation coupled with nitrite and sulfate reduction.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32092575</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126259</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-6535
ispartof Chemosphere (Oxford), 2020-07, Vol.250, p.126259-126259, Article 126259
issn 0045-6535
1879-1298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2364036676
source Elsevier
subjects Anaerobiosis
Auxiliary voltage
Bacteria - metabolism
Bioreactors - microbiology
Denitrification
Methane - metabolism
Methane oxidation
Microbial population
Nitrite reduction
Nitrites - metabolism
Nitrogen - metabolism
Oxidation-Reduction
Potential pathway
Sulfate reduction
Sulfates - metabolism
title Auxiliary voltage enhanced microbial methane oxidation co-driven by nitrite and sulfate reduction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A45%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Auxiliary%20voltage%20enhanced%20microbial%20methane%20oxidation%20co-driven%20by%20nitrite%20and%20sulfate%20reduction&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Chai,%20Fengguang&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=250&rft.spage=126259&rft.epage=126259&rft.pages=126259-126259&rft.artnum=126259&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2364036676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f125afa2d51c2cb045030637bd1cb1fdfc86bd44f3e6fbd3eb6c14bbe574928d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2364036676&rft_id=info:pmid/32092575&rfr_iscdi=true