Loading…
What are normal radiographic spine and shoulder balance parameters among adolescent patients?
Study design Retrospective. Objectives To define normal values and distributions for sagittal, coronal, and shoulder balance among healthy adolescents, both for traditional radiographs and biplanar radiography. Summary of background data Our understanding of spine balance, especially in the sagittal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Spine deformity 2020-08, Vol.8 (4), p.621-627 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Study design
Retrospective.
Objectives
To define normal values and distributions for sagittal, coronal, and shoulder balance among healthy adolescents, both for traditional radiographs and biplanar radiography.
Summary of background data
Our understanding of spine balance, especially in the sagittal plane, has expanded rapidly in recent years. Additionally, there has been growing use of simultaneous biplanar radiography which requires slightly different patient positioning. However, the normal ranges of several commonly used parameters have not yet been defined, either in traditional or biplanar radiography.
Methods
Radiographs were retrospectively reviewed of 273 patients aged 10–18 years seen in spine clinics at two high-volume centers and not diagnosed with any spine pathology. One center utilized traditional radiography and the other biplanar radiography. Coronal, sagittal, and shoulder balance were measured for each patient. Intra-observer reliability and normal values with distributions were reported for each parameter.
Results
Intra-observer reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficients ≥ 0.98). Each parameter was normally distributed at each institution based on Kolmogorov–Smirnov testing. Sagittal balance was more negative at the institution using traditional radiographs (− 3.4 ± 4.2 vs. 0.3 ± 2.2,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2212-134X 2212-1358 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s43390-020-00074-9 |