Loading…

Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)

Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal cognition 2020-05, Vol.23 (3), p.595-611
Main Authors: Congdon, Jenna V., Hahn, Allison H., Campbell, Kimberley A., Scully, Erin N., Yip, Daniel A., Bayne, Erin M., Sturdy, Christopher B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53
container_end_page 611
container_issue 3
container_start_page 595
container_title Animal cognition
container_volume 23
creator Congdon, Jenna V.
Hahn, Allison H.
Campbell, Kimberley A.
Scully, Erin N.
Yip, Daniel A.
Bayne, Erin M.
Sturdy, Christopher B.
description Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propose that there may be a continuum in threat perception. In the current study, we conducted an operant go/no-go experiment investigating black-capped chickadees’ acoustic discrimination of predator threat. After obtaining eight hawk and eight owl species’ calls, we assigned each species as: (1) large, low-threat, (2) mid-sized, unknown-threat and (3) small-, high-threat predators, according to wingspan and body size. Black-capped chickadees were either trained to respond (‘go’) to high-threat predator calls or respond to low-threat predator calls. When either low-threat predator calls were not reinforced or high-threat predator calls were not reinforced the birds were to withhold responding (‘no-go’) to those stimuli. We then tested transfer of training with additional small and large predator calls, as well as with the calls of several mid-sized predators. We confirmed that chickadees can discriminate between high- and low-threat predator calls. We further investigated how chickadees categorize mid-sized species’ calls by assessing transfer of training to previously non-differentially reinforced (i.e., pretraining) calls. Specifically, transfer test results suggest that mid-sized broad-winged hawks were perceived to be of high threat whereas mid-sized short-eared owls were perceived to be of low threat. However, mid-sized Cooper’s hawks and northern hawk owls were not significantly differentially responded to, suggesting that they are of medium threat which supports the notion that perception of threat is along a continuum rather than distinct categories of high or low threat.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10071-020-01364-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369387787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369387787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqXwAgwoEksZAr7EdjJWFTepEgzAarm-gNs0CXYy9O1xSCkSA4t9pPOd3z4fAOcIXiMI-U3oT5RCDFOICMtSegDGKCM0LTLKDvd1lo_ASQgrCGGeFegYjAhGkDOaj8HbTNVdaJ1KtAvKu42rZOvqKqlt0nijZVv7kCy3ybKUap0q2TRGJ-rDqbXUxoRk-lwb5UqTyNa72HZl2YWrU3BkZRnM2e6egNe725f5Q7p4un-czxapIpy2KaPQWCwtprCwNMOWWaQJVQXPFFbMKr2EROVUU2s00zDnNIM5kSzWlGtKJmA65Da-_uxMaMUmrmHKUlYm7iUwYQXJOc95RC__oKu681X8XaQKUjCOWR-IB0r5OgRvrGiiFOm3AkHR-xaDdRGti2_roh-62EV3y43R-5EfzREgAxBiq3o3_vftf2K_AETujJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2393967265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Congdon, Jenna V. ; Hahn, Allison H. ; Campbell, Kimberley A. ; Scully, Erin N. ; Yip, Daniel A. ; Bayne, Erin M. ; Sturdy, Christopher B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jenna V. ; Hahn, Allison H. ; Campbell, Kimberley A. ; Scully, Erin N. ; Yip, Daniel A. ; Bayne, Erin M. ; Sturdy, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><description>Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propose that there may be a continuum in threat perception. In the current study, we conducted an operant go/no-go experiment investigating black-capped chickadees’ acoustic discrimination of predator threat. After obtaining eight hawk and eight owl species’ calls, we assigned each species as: (1) large, low-threat, (2) mid-sized, unknown-threat and (3) small-, high-threat predators, according to wingspan and body size. Black-capped chickadees were either trained to respond (‘go’) to high-threat predator calls or respond to low-threat predator calls. When either low-threat predator calls were not reinforced or high-threat predator calls were not reinforced the birds were to withhold responding (‘no-go’) to those stimuli. We then tested transfer of training with additional small and large predator calls, as well as with the calls of several mid-sized predators. We confirmed that chickadees can discriminate between high- and low-threat predator calls. We further investigated how chickadees categorize mid-sized species’ calls by assessing transfer of training to previously non-differentially reinforced (i.e., pretraining) calls. Specifically, transfer test results suggest that mid-sized broad-winged hawks were perceived to be of high threat whereas mid-sized short-eared owls were perceived to be of low threat. However, mid-sized Cooper’s hawks and northern hawk owls were not significantly differentially responded to, suggesting that they are of medium threat which supports the notion that perception of threat is along a continuum rather than distinct categories of high or low threat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01364-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32107658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Auditory Perception ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Birds of prey ; Body size ; Discrimination, Psychological ; Life Sciences ; Operant conditioning ; Original Paper ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Predators ; Psychology Research ; Songbirds ; Species ; Training ; Transfer of training ; Vocalization, Animal ; Wing span ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2020-05, Vol.23 (3), p.595-611</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2721-3770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32107658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jenna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Allison H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kimberley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scully, Erin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yip, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayne, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturdy, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><title>Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propose that there may be a continuum in threat perception. In the current study, we conducted an operant go/no-go experiment investigating black-capped chickadees’ acoustic discrimination of predator threat. After obtaining eight hawk and eight owl species’ calls, we assigned each species as: (1) large, low-threat, (2) mid-sized, unknown-threat and (3) small-, high-threat predators, according to wingspan and body size. Black-capped chickadees were either trained to respond (‘go’) to high-threat predator calls or respond to low-threat predator calls. When either low-threat predator calls were not reinforced or high-threat predator calls were not reinforced the birds were to withhold responding (‘no-go’) to those stimuli. We then tested transfer of training with additional small and large predator calls, as well as with the calls of several mid-sized predators. We confirmed that chickadees can discriminate between high- and low-threat predator calls. We further investigated how chickadees categorize mid-sized species’ calls by assessing transfer of training to previously non-differentially reinforced (i.e., pretraining) calls. Specifically, transfer test results suggest that mid-sized broad-winged hawks were perceived to be of high threat whereas mid-sized short-eared owls were perceived to be of low threat. However, mid-sized Cooper’s hawks and northern hawk owls were not significantly differentially responded to, suggesting that they are of medium threat which supports the notion that perception of threat is along a continuum rather than distinct categories of high or low threat.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Discrimination, Psychological</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Operant conditioning</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Transfer of training</subject><subject>Vocalization, Animal</subject><subject>Wing span</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqXwAgwoEksZAr7EdjJWFTepEgzAarm-gNs0CXYy9O1xSCkSA4t9pPOd3z4fAOcIXiMI-U3oT5RCDFOICMtSegDGKCM0LTLKDvd1lo_ASQgrCGGeFegYjAhGkDOaj8HbTNVdaJ1KtAvKu42rZOvqKqlt0nijZVv7kCy3ybKUap0q2TRGJ-rDqbXUxoRk-lwb5UqTyNa72HZl2YWrU3BkZRnM2e6egNe725f5Q7p4un-czxapIpy2KaPQWCwtprCwNMOWWaQJVQXPFFbMKr2EROVUU2s00zDnNIM5kSzWlGtKJmA65Da-_uxMaMUmrmHKUlYm7iUwYQXJOc95RC__oKu681X8XaQKUjCOWR-IB0r5OgRvrGiiFOm3AkHR-xaDdRGti2_roh-62EV3y43R-5EfzREgAxBiq3o3_vftf2K_AETujJQ</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Congdon, Jenna V.</creator><creator>Hahn, Allison H.</creator><creator>Campbell, Kimberley A.</creator><creator>Scully, Erin N.</creator><creator>Yip, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Bayne, Erin M.</creator><creator>Sturdy, Christopher B.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2721-3770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)</title><author>Congdon, Jenna V. ; Hahn, Allison H. ; Campbell, Kimberley A. ; Scully, Erin N. ; Yip, Daniel A. ; Bayne, Erin M. ; Sturdy, Christopher B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Discrimination, Psychological</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Operant conditioning</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Transfer of training</topic><topic>Vocalization, Animal</topic><topic>Wing span</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jenna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Allison H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kimberley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scully, Erin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yip, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayne, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturdy, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Congdon, Jenna V.</au><au>Hahn, Allison H.</au><au>Campbell, Kimberley A.</au><au>Scully, Erin N.</au><au>Yip, Daniel A.</au><au>Bayne, Erin M.</au><au>Sturdy, Christopher B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>595</spage><epage>611</epage><pages>595-611</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propose that there may be a continuum in threat perception. In the current study, we conducted an operant go/no-go experiment investigating black-capped chickadees’ acoustic discrimination of predator threat. After obtaining eight hawk and eight owl species’ calls, we assigned each species as: (1) large, low-threat, (2) mid-sized, unknown-threat and (3) small-, high-threat predators, according to wingspan and body size. Black-capped chickadees were either trained to respond (‘go’) to high-threat predator calls or respond to low-threat predator calls. When either low-threat predator calls were not reinforced or high-threat predator calls were not reinforced the birds were to withhold responding (‘no-go’) to those stimuli. We then tested transfer of training with additional small and large predator calls, as well as with the calls of several mid-sized predators. We confirmed that chickadees can discriminate between high- and low-threat predator calls. We further investigated how chickadees categorize mid-sized species’ calls by assessing transfer of training to previously non-differentially reinforced (i.e., pretraining) calls. Specifically, transfer test results suggest that mid-sized broad-winged hawks were perceived to be of high threat whereas mid-sized short-eared owls were perceived to be of low threat. However, mid-sized Cooper’s hawks and northern hawk owls were not significantly differentially responded to, suggesting that they are of medium threat which supports the notion that perception of threat is along a continuum rather than distinct categories of high or low threat.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32107658</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-020-01364-5</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2721-3770</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-9448
ispartof Animal cognition, 2020-05, Vol.23 (3), p.595-611
issn 1435-9448
1435-9456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369387787
source Springer Nature
subjects Acoustics
Animal behavior
Animals
Auditory Perception
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Birds
Birds of prey
Body size
Discrimination, Psychological
Life Sciences
Operant conditioning
Original Paper
Perception
Perceptions
Predators
Psychology Research
Songbirds
Species
Training
Transfer of training
Vocalization, Animal
Wing span
Zoology
title Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A45%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acoustic%20discrimination%20of%20predators%20by%20black-capped%20chickadees%20(Poecile%20atricapillus)&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Congdon,%20Jenna%20V.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=611&rft.pages=595-611&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-020-01364-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2369387787%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2393967265&rft_id=info:pmid/32107658&rfr_iscdi=true