Loading…
Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)
Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propos...
Saved in:
Published in: | Animal cognition 2020-05, Vol.23 (3), p.595-611 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53 |
container_end_page | 611 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 595 |
container_title | Animal cognition |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Congdon, Jenna V. Hahn, Allison H. Campbell, Kimberley A. Scully, Erin N. Yip, Daniel A. Bayne, Erin M. Sturdy, Christopher B. |
description | Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propose that there may be a continuum in threat perception. In the current study, we conducted an operant go/no-go experiment investigating black-capped chickadees’ acoustic discrimination of predator threat. After obtaining eight hawk and eight owl species’ calls, we assigned each species as: (1) large, low-threat, (2) mid-sized, unknown-threat and (3) small-, high-threat predators, according to wingspan and body size. Black-capped chickadees were either trained to respond (‘go’) to high-threat predator calls or respond to low-threat predator calls. When either low-threat predator calls were not reinforced or high-threat predator calls were not reinforced the birds were to withhold responding (‘no-go’) to those stimuli. We then tested transfer of training with additional small and large predator calls, as well as with the calls of several mid-sized predators. We confirmed that chickadees can discriminate between high- and low-threat predator calls. We further investigated how chickadees categorize mid-sized species’ calls by assessing transfer of training to previously non-differentially reinforced (i.e., pretraining) calls. Specifically, transfer test results suggest that mid-sized broad-winged hawks were perceived to be of high threat whereas mid-sized short-eared owls were perceived to be of low threat. However, mid-sized Cooper’s hawks and northern hawk owls were not significantly differentially responded to, suggesting that they are of medium threat which supports the notion that perception of threat is along a continuum rather than distinct categories of high or low threat. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10071-020-01364-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369387787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369387787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqXwAgwoEksZAr7EdjJWFTepEgzAarm-gNs0CXYy9O1xSCkSA4t9pPOd3z4fAOcIXiMI-U3oT5RCDFOICMtSegDGKCM0LTLKDvd1lo_ASQgrCGGeFegYjAhGkDOaj8HbTNVdaJ1KtAvKu42rZOvqKqlt0nijZVv7kCy3ybKUap0q2TRGJ-rDqbXUxoRk-lwb5UqTyNa72HZl2YWrU3BkZRnM2e6egNe725f5Q7p4un-czxapIpy2KaPQWCwtprCwNMOWWaQJVQXPFFbMKr2EROVUU2s00zDnNIM5kSzWlGtKJmA65Da-_uxMaMUmrmHKUlYm7iUwYQXJOc95RC__oKu681X8XaQKUjCOWR-IB0r5OgRvrGiiFOm3AkHR-xaDdRGti2_roh-62EV3y43R-5EfzREgAxBiq3o3_vftf2K_AETujJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2393967265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Congdon, Jenna V. ; Hahn, Allison H. ; Campbell, Kimberley A. ; Scully, Erin N. ; Yip, Daniel A. ; Bayne, Erin M. ; Sturdy, Christopher B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jenna V. ; Hahn, Allison H. ; Campbell, Kimberley A. ; Scully, Erin N. ; Yip, Daniel A. ; Bayne, Erin M. ; Sturdy, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><description>Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propose that there may be a continuum in threat perception. In the current study, we conducted an operant go/no-go experiment investigating black-capped chickadees’ acoustic discrimination of predator threat. After obtaining eight hawk and eight owl species’ calls, we assigned each species as: (1) large, low-threat, (2) mid-sized, unknown-threat and (3) small-, high-threat predators, according to wingspan and body size. Black-capped chickadees were either trained to respond (‘go’) to high-threat predator calls or respond to low-threat predator calls. When either low-threat predator calls were not reinforced or high-threat predator calls were not reinforced the birds were to withhold responding (‘no-go’) to those stimuli. We then tested transfer of training with additional small and large predator calls, as well as with the calls of several mid-sized predators. We confirmed that chickadees can discriminate between high- and low-threat predator calls. We further investigated how chickadees categorize mid-sized species’ calls by assessing transfer of training to previously non-differentially reinforced (i.e., pretraining) calls. Specifically, transfer test results suggest that mid-sized broad-winged hawks were perceived to be of high threat whereas mid-sized short-eared owls were perceived to be of low threat. However, mid-sized Cooper’s hawks and northern hawk owls were not significantly differentially responded to, suggesting that they are of medium threat which supports the notion that perception of threat is along a continuum rather than distinct categories of high or low threat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01364-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32107658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Auditory Perception ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Birds of prey ; Body size ; Discrimination, Psychological ; Life Sciences ; Operant conditioning ; Original Paper ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Predators ; Psychology Research ; Songbirds ; Species ; Training ; Transfer of training ; Vocalization, Animal ; Wing span ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2020-05, Vol.23 (3), p.595-611</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2721-3770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32107658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jenna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Allison H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kimberley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scully, Erin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yip, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayne, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturdy, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><title>Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propose that there may be a continuum in threat perception. In the current study, we conducted an operant go/no-go experiment investigating black-capped chickadees’ acoustic discrimination of predator threat. After obtaining eight hawk and eight owl species’ calls, we assigned each species as: (1) large, low-threat, (2) mid-sized, unknown-threat and (3) small-, high-threat predators, according to wingspan and body size. Black-capped chickadees were either trained to respond (‘go’) to high-threat predator calls or respond to low-threat predator calls. When either low-threat predator calls were not reinforced or high-threat predator calls were not reinforced the birds were to withhold responding (‘no-go’) to those stimuli. We then tested transfer of training with additional small and large predator calls, as well as with the calls of several mid-sized predators. We confirmed that chickadees can discriminate between high- and low-threat predator calls. We further investigated how chickadees categorize mid-sized species’ calls by assessing transfer of training to previously non-differentially reinforced (i.e., pretraining) calls. Specifically, transfer test results suggest that mid-sized broad-winged hawks were perceived to be of high threat whereas mid-sized short-eared owls were perceived to be of low threat. However, mid-sized Cooper’s hawks and northern hawk owls were not significantly differentially responded to, suggesting that they are of medium threat which supports the notion that perception of threat is along a continuum rather than distinct categories of high or low threat.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Discrimination, Psychological</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Operant conditioning</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Transfer of training</subject><subject>Vocalization, Animal</subject><subject>Wing span</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqXwAgwoEksZAr7EdjJWFTepEgzAarm-gNs0CXYy9O1xSCkSA4t9pPOd3z4fAOcIXiMI-U3oT5RCDFOICMtSegDGKCM0LTLKDvd1lo_ASQgrCGGeFegYjAhGkDOaj8HbTNVdaJ1KtAvKu42rZOvqKqlt0nijZVv7kCy3ybKUap0q2TRGJ-rDqbXUxoRk-lwb5UqTyNa72HZl2YWrU3BkZRnM2e6egNe725f5Q7p4un-czxapIpy2KaPQWCwtprCwNMOWWaQJVQXPFFbMKr2EROVUU2s00zDnNIM5kSzWlGtKJmA65Da-_uxMaMUmrmHKUlYm7iUwYQXJOc95RC__oKu681X8XaQKUjCOWR-IB0r5OgRvrGiiFOm3AkHR-xaDdRGti2_roh-62EV3y43R-5EfzREgAxBiq3o3_vftf2K_AETujJQ</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Congdon, Jenna V.</creator><creator>Hahn, Allison H.</creator><creator>Campbell, Kimberley A.</creator><creator>Scully, Erin N.</creator><creator>Yip, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Bayne, Erin M.</creator><creator>Sturdy, Christopher B.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2721-3770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)</title><author>Congdon, Jenna V. ; Hahn, Allison H. ; Campbell, Kimberley A. ; Scully, Erin N. ; Yip, Daniel A. ; Bayne, Erin M. ; Sturdy, Christopher B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Discrimination, Psychological</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Operant conditioning</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Transfer of training</topic><topic>Vocalization, Animal</topic><topic>Wing span</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jenna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Allison H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kimberley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scully, Erin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yip, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayne, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturdy, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Congdon, Jenna V.</au><au>Hahn, Allison H.</au><au>Campbell, Kimberley A.</au><au>Scully, Erin N.</au><au>Yip, Daniel A.</au><au>Bayne, Erin M.</au><au>Sturdy, Christopher B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>595</spage><epage>611</epage><pages>595-611</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>Smaller owls and hawks are high-threat predators to small songbirds, like chickadees, in comparison to larger avian predators due to smaller raptors’ agility (Templeton et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:5479–5482, 2005). The current literature focuses only on high- and low-threat predators. We propose that there may be a continuum in threat perception. In the current study, we conducted an operant go/no-go experiment investigating black-capped chickadees’ acoustic discrimination of predator threat. After obtaining eight hawk and eight owl species’ calls, we assigned each species as: (1) large, low-threat, (2) mid-sized, unknown-threat and (3) small-, high-threat predators, according to wingspan and body size. Black-capped chickadees were either trained to respond (‘go’) to high-threat predator calls or respond to low-threat predator calls. When either low-threat predator calls were not reinforced or high-threat predator calls were not reinforced the birds were to withhold responding (‘no-go’) to those stimuli. We then tested transfer of training with additional small and large predator calls, as well as with the calls of several mid-sized predators. We confirmed that chickadees can discriminate between high- and low-threat predator calls. We further investigated how chickadees categorize mid-sized species’ calls by assessing transfer of training to previously non-differentially reinforced (i.e., pretraining) calls. Specifically, transfer test results suggest that mid-sized broad-winged hawks were perceived to be of high threat whereas mid-sized short-eared owls were perceived to be of low threat. However, mid-sized Cooper’s hawks and northern hawk owls were not significantly differentially responded to, suggesting that they are of medium threat which supports the notion that perception of threat is along a continuum rather than distinct categories of high or low threat.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32107658</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-020-01364-5</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2721-3770</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-9448 |
ispartof | Animal cognition, 2020-05, Vol.23 (3), p.595-611 |
issn | 1435-9448 1435-9456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369387787 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Acoustics Animal behavior Animals Auditory Perception Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Birds Birds of prey Body size Discrimination, Psychological Life Sciences Operant conditioning Original Paper Perception Perceptions Predators Psychology Research Songbirds Species Training Transfer of training Vocalization, Animal Wing span Zoology |
title | Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A45%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acoustic%20discrimination%20of%20predators%20by%20black-capped%20chickadees%20(Poecile%20atricapillus)&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Congdon,%20Jenna%20V.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=611&rft.pages=595-611&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-020-01364-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2369387787%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-650ef2af2509f542f6f1d35c974c2c6fcdb03c85d5fed6d08754083a66d057d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2393967265&rft_id=info:pmid/32107658&rfr_iscdi=true |