Loading…
Evidence of Interleukin-2-Receptor-Antibody Induction in Low-Risk Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Pilot Study
The recommended standard immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients comprises an initial induction therapy mainly with an interleukin-2-receptor antibody (IL2-RA) and a triple maintenance therapy. With tacrolimus and mycophenolate acid it is unknown whether IL2-RA application affects...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transplantation proceedings 2020-04, Vol.52 (3), p.780-784 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d2f11fa3319fccb9f940835445812c47b7937e860cc69f9b0b70093600f675813 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d2f11fa3319fccb9f940835445812c47b7937e860cc69f9b0b70093600f675813 |
container_end_page | 784 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 780 |
container_title | Transplantation proceedings |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Jänigen, Bernd Martin Gehrmann, Susanne Glatz, Torben Seidl, Max Thomusch, Oliver Prager, Eric Peter Zschiedrich, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Pisarski, Przemyslaw Schneider, Johanna |
description | The recommended standard immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients comprises an initial induction therapy mainly with an interleukin-2-receptor antibody (IL2-RA) and a triple maintenance therapy. With tacrolimus and mycophenolate acid it is unknown whether IL2-RA application affects the short- and long-term results. This question is addressed in the present analysis.
From July 2007 to June 2019 a total of 127 living donor kidney transplant recipients meeting the center-specific definition of immunologic low risk situation (first transplantation, HLA-mismatch ≤3, panel reactive antibody ≤10%) were identified. In 83 recipients with a first-degree relationship to the donor we omitted the IL2-RA induction (IL2-RA-). The remaining 44 recipients, mostly not first-degree relatives, served as controls (IL2-RA+). Biopsy-proven acute rejection and long-term patient and graft survival rates were compared.
Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates after 3 months were similar in both groups with 4.8% (IL2-RA-) vs 13.7% (IL2-RA+; P = .0937), including borderline rejection rates of 18.0% (IL2-RA-) vs 18.3% (IL2-RA+; P = 1.000), respectively. Ten-year long-term survival rates were comparable between the IL2-RA- and the IL2-RA+ group with 95.6% vs 93.5% (patient survival; P = .5465) and 92.1% vs 90.6% (death-censored graft survival; P = .8893).
For low-risk living donor kidney transplant recipients with first-degree relationship to the donor, it is safe to omit induction therapy with IL2-RA.
•Induction therapy in low-risk kidney recipients.•Interleukin-2-receptor antibody in renal transplantation.•Immunosuppression in living donor kidney transplantation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.036 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369430366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134519318172</els_id><sourcerecordid>2369430366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d2f11fa3319fccb9f940835445812c47b7937e860cc69f9b0b70093600f675813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhLyCLExeHsZ11kt5W20IrVgK15WwlzgR5m7UX21m0V345TreVOHKyrPc9z_g9Qj5wKDhw9WlbpNC6uA_eIPaFAAEF8AKkekEWvK4kE0rIl2QBUHLGZbk8I29i3EK-i1K-JmdScM5lrRbkz9XB9ugMUj_QG5cwjDg9WMcEu0WD--QDW7lkO98fs95PJlnvqHV043-zWxsf6MYerPtJL73zgX61vcMjvX9ccGxdamf-gq7oXYZGZGuch9DvdvSJ3qWpP74lr4Z2jPju6TwnPz5f3a-v2ebbl5v1asOMrCGxXgycD62UvBmM6ZqhKaGWy7Jc1lyYsuqqRlZYKzBGZbGDrgJopAIYVJUZeU4-nt7Nwf2aMCa9s9HgmLdEP0UtpGpKmVNUGb04oSb4GAMOeh_srg1HzUHPHeit_rcDPXeggevszub3T3Ombpe1Z-tz6Bm4PAGYf3uwGHQ0du6gtwFN0r23_zPnLy2kn0o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369430366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence of Interleukin-2-Receptor-Antibody Induction in Low-Risk Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Pilot Study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Jänigen, Bernd Martin ; Gehrmann, Susanne ; Glatz, Torben ; Seidl, Max ; Thomusch, Oliver ; Prager, Eric Peter ; Zschiedrich, Stefan ; Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan ; Pisarski, Przemyslaw ; Schneider, Johanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Jänigen, Bernd Martin ; Gehrmann, Susanne ; Glatz, Torben ; Seidl, Max ; Thomusch, Oliver ; Prager, Eric Peter ; Zschiedrich, Stefan ; Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan ; Pisarski, Przemyslaw ; Schneider, Johanna</creatorcontrib><description>The recommended standard immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients comprises an initial induction therapy mainly with an interleukin-2-receptor antibody (IL2-RA) and a triple maintenance therapy. With tacrolimus and mycophenolate acid it is unknown whether IL2-RA application affects the short- and long-term results. This question is addressed in the present analysis.
From July 2007 to June 2019 a total of 127 living donor kidney transplant recipients meeting the center-specific definition of immunologic low risk situation (first transplantation, HLA-mismatch ≤3, panel reactive antibody ≤10%) were identified. In 83 recipients with a first-degree relationship to the donor we omitted the IL2-RA induction (IL2-RA-). The remaining 44 recipients, mostly not first-degree relatives, served as controls (IL2-RA+). Biopsy-proven acute rejection and long-term patient and graft survival rates were compared.
Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates after 3 months were similar in both groups with 4.8% (IL2-RA-) vs 13.7% (IL2-RA+; P = .0937), including borderline rejection rates of 18.0% (IL2-RA-) vs 18.3% (IL2-RA+; P = 1.000), respectively. Ten-year long-term survival rates were comparable between the IL2-RA- and the IL2-RA+ group with 95.6% vs 93.5% (patient survival; P = .5465) and 92.1% vs 90.6% (death-censored graft survival; P = .8893).
For low-risk living donor kidney transplant recipients with first-degree relationship to the donor, it is safe to omit induction therapy with IL2-RA.
•Induction therapy in low-risk kidney recipients.•Interleukin-2-receptor antibody in renal transplantation.•Immunosuppression in living donor kidney transplantation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32111386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2020-04, Vol.52 (3), p.780-784</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d2f11fa3319fccb9f940835445812c47b7937e860cc69f9b0b70093600f675813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d2f11fa3319fccb9f940835445812c47b7937e860cc69f9b0b70093600f675813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jänigen, Bernd Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrmann, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glatz, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomusch, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prager, Eric Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zschiedrich, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisarski, Przemyslaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Johanna</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence of Interleukin-2-Receptor-Antibody Induction in Low-Risk Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Pilot Study</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>The recommended standard immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients comprises an initial induction therapy mainly with an interleukin-2-receptor antibody (IL2-RA) and a triple maintenance therapy. With tacrolimus and mycophenolate acid it is unknown whether IL2-RA application affects the short- and long-term results. This question is addressed in the present analysis.
From July 2007 to June 2019 a total of 127 living donor kidney transplant recipients meeting the center-specific definition of immunologic low risk situation (first transplantation, HLA-mismatch ≤3, panel reactive antibody ≤10%) were identified. In 83 recipients with a first-degree relationship to the donor we omitted the IL2-RA induction (IL2-RA-). The remaining 44 recipients, mostly not first-degree relatives, served as controls (IL2-RA+). Biopsy-proven acute rejection and long-term patient and graft survival rates were compared.
Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates after 3 months were similar in both groups with 4.8% (IL2-RA-) vs 13.7% (IL2-RA+; P = .0937), including borderline rejection rates of 18.0% (IL2-RA-) vs 18.3% (IL2-RA+; P = 1.000), respectively. Ten-year long-term survival rates were comparable between the IL2-RA- and the IL2-RA+ group with 95.6% vs 93.5% (patient survival; P = .5465) and 92.1% vs 90.6% (death-censored graft survival; P = .8893).
For low-risk living donor kidney transplant recipients with first-degree relationship to the donor, it is safe to omit induction therapy with IL2-RA.
•Induction therapy in low-risk kidney recipients.•Interleukin-2-receptor antibody in renal transplantation.•Immunosuppression in living donor kidney transplantation.</description><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhLyCLExeHsZ11kt5W20IrVgK15WwlzgR5m7UX21m0V345TreVOHKyrPc9z_g9Qj5wKDhw9WlbpNC6uA_eIPaFAAEF8AKkekEWvK4kE0rIl2QBUHLGZbk8I29i3EK-i1K-JmdScM5lrRbkz9XB9ugMUj_QG5cwjDg9WMcEu0WD--QDW7lkO98fs95PJlnvqHV043-zWxsf6MYerPtJL73zgX61vcMjvX9ccGxdamf-gq7oXYZGZGuch9DvdvSJ3qWpP74lr4Z2jPju6TwnPz5f3a-v2ebbl5v1asOMrCGxXgycD62UvBmM6ZqhKaGWy7Jc1lyYsuqqRlZYKzBGZbGDrgJopAIYVJUZeU4-nt7Nwf2aMCa9s9HgmLdEP0UtpGpKmVNUGb04oSb4GAMOeh_srg1HzUHPHeit_rcDPXeggevszub3T3Ombpe1Z-tz6Bm4PAGYf3uwGHQ0du6gtwFN0r23_zPnLy2kn0o</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Jänigen, Bernd Martin</creator><creator>Gehrmann, Susanne</creator><creator>Glatz, Torben</creator><creator>Seidl, Max</creator><creator>Thomusch, Oliver</creator><creator>Prager, Eric Peter</creator><creator>Zschiedrich, Stefan</creator><creator>Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan</creator><creator>Pisarski, Przemyslaw</creator><creator>Schneider, Johanna</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Evidence of Interleukin-2-Receptor-Antibody Induction in Low-Risk Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Pilot Study</title><author>Jänigen, Bernd Martin ; Gehrmann, Susanne ; Glatz, Torben ; Seidl, Max ; Thomusch, Oliver ; Prager, Eric Peter ; Zschiedrich, Stefan ; Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan ; Pisarski, Przemyslaw ; Schneider, Johanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d2f11fa3319fccb9f940835445812c47b7937e860cc69f9b0b70093600f675813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jänigen, Bernd Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrmann, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glatz, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomusch, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prager, Eric Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zschiedrich, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisarski, Przemyslaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Johanna</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jänigen, Bernd Martin</au><au>Gehrmann, Susanne</au><au>Glatz, Torben</au><au>Seidl, Max</au><au>Thomusch, Oliver</au><au>Prager, Eric Peter</au><au>Zschiedrich, Stefan</au><au>Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan</au><au>Pisarski, Przemyslaw</au><au>Schneider, Johanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence of Interleukin-2-Receptor-Antibody Induction in Low-Risk Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>780</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>780-784</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>The recommended standard immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients comprises an initial induction therapy mainly with an interleukin-2-receptor antibody (IL2-RA) and a triple maintenance therapy. With tacrolimus and mycophenolate acid it is unknown whether IL2-RA application affects the short- and long-term results. This question is addressed in the present analysis.
From July 2007 to June 2019 a total of 127 living donor kidney transplant recipients meeting the center-specific definition of immunologic low risk situation (first transplantation, HLA-mismatch ≤3, panel reactive antibody ≤10%) were identified. In 83 recipients with a first-degree relationship to the donor we omitted the IL2-RA induction (IL2-RA-). The remaining 44 recipients, mostly not first-degree relatives, served as controls (IL2-RA+). Biopsy-proven acute rejection and long-term patient and graft survival rates were compared.
Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates after 3 months were similar in both groups with 4.8% (IL2-RA-) vs 13.7% (IL2-RA+; P = .0937), including borderline rejection rates of 18.0% (IL2-RA-) vs 18.3% (IL2-RA+; P = 1.000), respectively. Ten-year long-term survival rates were comparable between the IL2-RA- and the IL2-RA+ group with 95.6% vs 93.5% (patient survival; P = .5465) and 92.1% vs 90.6% (death-censored graft survival; P = .8893).
For low-risk living donor kidney transplant recipients with first-degree relationship to the donor, it is safe to omit induction therapy with IL2-RA.
•Induction therapy in low-risk kidney recipients.•Interleukin-2-receptor antibody in renal transplantation.•Immunosuppression in living donor kidney transplantation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32111386</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.036</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1345 |
ispartof | Transplantation proceedings, 2020-04, Vol.52 (3), p.780-784 |
issn | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369430366 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
title | Evidence of Interleukin-2-Receptor-Antibody Induction in Low-Risk Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Pilot Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A20%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20of%20Interleukin-2-Receptor-Antibody%20Induction%20in%20Low-Risk%20Living%20Donor%20Kidney%20Transplantation:%20A%20Single-Center%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=J%C3%A4nigen,%20Bernd%20Martin&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=780&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=780-784&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2369430366%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d2f11fa3319fccb9f940835445812c47b7937e860cc69f9b0b70093600f675813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369430366&rft_id=info:pmid/32111386&rfr_iscdi=true |